Article published In:
Perception, Culture and LanguageEdited by Judit Baranyiné Kóczy and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2] 2023
► pp. 313–341
Edited by Judit Baranyiné Kóczy and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2] 2023
► pp. 313–341
Cultural conceptualizations of sight and cultural values
A contrastive analysis of Hungarian vision verbs
The relationship between visual experience and cognition manifested in the thinking/knowing/understanding is seeing metaphor, is claimed to be the primary vision metaphor in various languages. However, only a few studies considered its extension to less central domains such as cultural values. The paper seeks to understand how the figurative usages of Hungarian vision verbs refer to the cultural values of morality, respect, and hospitality. Three verbs of vision are invesitaged employing Cultural Linguistic and cognitive semantic analyses, namely, néz ‘look/watch’, lát ‘see’, and tekint ‘look/glance’. It is demonstrated that visual perception in Hungarian has a significant role in moral reasoning; however, there are substantial differences in the ways these vision verbs relate to them. To find a motivational explanation for these differences, the semantic properties of the verbs are identified through contrastive analysis and by observing their semantic profiles within the vision scenario. As a result, a cultural model of each verb is reconstructed. The study gives a refined view on the linkage of sight and cultural values in Hungarian, furthermore, the proposed methodology can be effectively applied to various areas of perception research in a cultural context.
Keywords: cultural conceptualizations, Hungarian, morality, respect, vision verbs
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Figurative extensions of perception verbs
- 3.The concept and cultural models of cultural values
- 4.Metaphors of cultural values in the domain of sight
- 5.Hungarian vision verbs and their extensions to cultural values
- 5.1Extensions of néz ‘look/watch’
- 5.2Extensions of lát ‘see’
- 5.3Extensions of tekint ‘look/glance’
- 6.Semantic properties and cultural models of vision verbs
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Storch, A.
(Eds.) (2013) Perception
and cognition in language and
culture. Leiden: Brill. 
Alm-Arvius, C.
(1993) The
English verb see: A study in multiple
meaning. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Baker, C. E.
(1999) Seeing
clearly: Frame semantic, psycholinguistics, and cross-linguistic approaches to the semantics of the English verb
see. Unpublished Ph.D.
dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.
Baranyiné Kóczy, J.
(2020) Keeping
an eye on body parts: Cultural conceptualizations of the ‘eye’ in
Hungarian. In I. Kraska-Szlenk (Ed.), Body
part terms in conceptualization and language
usage (pp. 215–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2021) The
moral eye: A study of Hungarian szem
. In M. Baş & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), Embodiment
in cross-linguistic studies: The
‘eye’ (pp. 45–69). Leiden: Brill.
Bárczi, G. & Országh, L.
(Eds.) (1978) A magyar nyelv értelmező szótára III. Harmadik kiadás [Dictionary of
the Hungarian Language Vol. III. Third
edition]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Bárczi, G., & Országh, L.
(Eds.) (1979) A magyar nyelv értelmező szótára IV. Harmadik kiadás [Dictionary of
the Hungarian language Vol. IV. third
edition]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
(Eds.) (1980a) A magyar nyelv értelmező szótára V. Harmadik kiadás [Dictionary of
the Hungarian language Vol. V. third
edition]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
(Eds.) (1980b) A magyar nyelv értelmező szótára VI. Harmadik kiadás [Dictionary of
the Hungarian language Vol. VI. third
edition]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Baş, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I.
(Eds.) (2021) Embodiment
in cross-linguistic studies: The
‘eye’. Leiden: Brill.
Brenzinger, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I.
(Eds.) (2014) The
body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic
embodiment. Leiden: Brill.
Caruso, E. M., & Gino, F.
(2011) Blind
ethics: Closing one’s eyes polarizes moral judgments and discourages dishonest
behavior. Cognition,
118
(2), 280–285.
Ciprianová, E., & Kováčová, Z.
(2018) Figurative
‘eye’ expressions in the conceptualization of emotions and personality traits in
Slovak. Jezikoslovlje,
19
(1), 5–38.
Classen, C.
(1993) Worlds
of sense: Exploring the senses in history and across
cultures. London: Longman.
(Ed.) (2005) The
book of touch (1st
ed.). London: Routledge.
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H.
(2019) Is
it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current
Anthropology,
60
(1), 47–69.
Danesi, M.
(1990) Thinking
is seeing: Visual metaphors and the nature of abstract
thought. Semiotica,
80
(3–4), 221–238.
de Vries, L.
(2013) Seeing,
hearing and thinking in Korowai, a language of West Papua. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & A. Storch (Eds.), Perception
and cognition in language and
culture (pp. 111–136). Leiden: Brill.
Divjak, D.
(2015) Exploring
the grammar of perception: A case study using data from Russian. Functions of
Language,
22
(1), 44–68.
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D.
(2000) In
the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian
languages. Language,
76
(3), 546–592.
Gisborne, N.
(2010) The
event structure of perception verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Handfield, T., & Thrasher, J.
(2019) Two
of a kind: Are norms of honor a species of morality?. Biology &
Philosophy,
34
1, Article 39.
Holland, D., & Quinn, N.
(Eds.) 1987 Cultural
models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howes, D.
(Ed.) (1991) The
varieties of sensory experience: A sourcebook in the anthropology of the
senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(1999) Metaphorical
mappings in the sense of smell. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor
in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 29–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2002) MIND-AS-BODY
as a cross-linguistic conceptual metaphor. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American
Studies,
25
1, 93–119.
(2008) Vision
metaphors for the intellect: Are they really
cross-linguistic?. Atlantis,
30
(1), 15–33.
Johnson, M.
(1987) The
body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and
reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1993) Moral
imagination: Implications of cognitive science for
ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, M., & Lenci, A.
Kerr, J.
(2002) The
open door: Hospitality and honour in twelfth/early thirteenth-century
England. History,
87
(287), 322–335.
(2007) ‘Welcome
the coming and speed the parting guest’: Hospitality in twelfth-century England. Journal of
Medieval
History,
33
(2), 130–146.
Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Metaphor:
Does it constitute or reflect cultural models?. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor
in cognitive linguistics (pp. 167–188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2015) Where
metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in
metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kraska-Szlenk, I.
(2014) Semantics
of body part terms: General trends and a case study of
Swahili. München: Lincom.
Lajos, K.
(2021) “Nem tudnak újjal rámutatni”: A test a szexualitásról való beszéd csíkszentdomonkosi
frazeológiájában [“No-one can point their fingers at her”: The body in the
phraseology of talking about sexuality in Csikszentdomonkos]. In K. Lajos & J. Pieldner (Eds.), Zsuzsa
könyve. Tanulmányok Tapodi Zsuzsa
születésnapjára (pp. 217–227). Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Múzeum Egyesület.
Langacker, R. W.
(1991) Concept,
image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of
grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Maalej, Z.
(2011) Figurative
dimensions of 3ayn ‘eye’ in Tunisian Arabic. In Z. Maalej & N. Yu (Eds.), Embodiment
via body parts: Studies from various languages and
cultures (pp. 213–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Maalej, Z., & Yu, N.
(Eds.) (2011) Embodiment
via body parts: Studies from various languages and
cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L., Woll, B., LeLan, B., de Sousa, H., Cansler, B. L., Shayan, S., de Vos, C., Senft, G., Enfield, N. J., Razak, R. A., Fedden, S., Tufvesson, S., Dingemanse, M., Ozturk, O.,… Levinson, S. C.
(2018) Differential
coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences,
115
(45), 11369–11376.
Occhi, D. J.
(2011) A
cultural-linguistic look at Japanese ‘eye’ expressions. In Z. Maalej & N. Yu (Eds.), Embodiment
via body parts: Studies from various languages and
cultures (pp. 171–194). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Proos, M.
(2019) Polysemy
of the Estonian perception verb nägema ‘to
see’. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception
metaphors (pp. 231–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2020) Feeling
your neighbour: An experimental approach to the polysemy of tundma ‘to feel’ in
Estonian. Language and
Cognition,
12
(2), 282–309.
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, J., Tufvesson, S., van Putten, S., & Majid, A.
(2015) Vision
verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs
varies. Cognitive
linguistics,
26
(1), 31–60.
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., & Majid, A.
(2018) Universal
meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive
Linguistics,
29
(3), 371–406.
Sekuler, R., & Blake, R.
(1994) Perception. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sharifian, F.
(2011a) Conceptualizations
of cheshm ‘eye’ in Persian. In Z. Maalej & N. Yu (Eds.), Embodiment
via body parts: Studies from various languages and
cultures (pp. 197–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2011b) Cultural
conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and
applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S.
(Eds.) (2008) Culture,
body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and
languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Shehu, A.
(2020) The
conceptualisation of ido ‘eye’ in Hausa. In I. Kraska−Szlenk (Ed.), Body
part terms in conceptualization and language
usage (pp. 247–268). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Simon, G.
this
volume). The perspective of the other: A corpus-based analysis of visual perception in
Hungarian elegiac poetry. Cognitive Linguistic
Studies,
10
(2).
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From
etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic
structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szily, K.
(1902) A magyar nyelvújítás szótára: A kedveltebb képzők és képzésmódok jegyzékével [Dictionary of the Hungarian language reform: With a list of the most popular derivative suffixes and derivation
modes]. Budapest: Hornyánszky.
Usoniene, A.
(2001) On
direct/indirect perception with verbs of seeing and seeming in English and Lithuanian. Working
papers/Lund University, Department of Linguistics and
Phonetics,
48
1, 163–182.
Vainik, E.
(2018) Emotion
meets taste: Taste-motivated emotion terms in Estonian. Folklore: Electronic Journal of
Folklore,
71
1, 129–154.
Vanhove, M.
(2008) Semantic
associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A crosslinguistic
perspective. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From
polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic
associations (pp. 341–370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Viberg, Å.
(1983) The
verbs of perception: A Typological
Study. Linguistics,
21
(1), 123–162.
(2008) Swedish
verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive
perspective. In M. Á. Gómez González, J. L. Mackenzie & E. M. González Álvarez (Eds.), Languages
and cultures in contrast and
comparison (pp. 123–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Whitt, R. J.
(2010) Evidentiality,
polysemy, and the verbs of perception in English and German. In G. Diewald & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic
realization of evidentiality in European
languages (pp. 249–278). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Winter, B., Perlman, M., & Majid, A.
(2018) Vision
dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for
usage. Cognition,
179
1, 213–220.
Yu, N.
(2004) The
eyes for sight and mind. Journal of
Pragmatics,
36
(4), 663–686.
(2008) Metaphor
from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2015) Metaphorical
character of moral cognition: A comparative and decompositional analysis. Metaphor and
Symbol,
30
(3), 163–183.
(2016) Spatial
metaphors for morality: A perspective from Chinese. Metaphor and
Symbol,
31
(2), 108–125.
(2022) The
moral metaphor system: A conceptual metaphor
approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.