Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 1:1 (2014) ► pp.55–83

From Cognitive Linguistics to Historical Sociolinguistics

The evolution of Old English expressions of shame and guilt

| Department of Modern Languages, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha

This paper focuses on the analysis of the different motifs that shape the linguistic expression of shame and guilt in Old English. Through the fine-grained analysis of the whole set of shame and guilt expressions recorded in a corpus of Old English texts, a network of literal and figurative conceptualizations for each emotion is proposed. On the basis of these expressions, I argue here that body-related expressions (either metonymic or metaphoric) occupy a very secondary role in the Anglo-Saxon imagery of shame and guilt. In clear contrast with this view of shame and guilt as instruments of social control, the Christianization of England implied the spread of new shame-related values and the growing use of a new set of embodied conceptualizations for the two emotions under scrutiny here, most of which have become common figurative expressions of shame and guilt in later varieties of English. The new expressions (e.g. SHAME IS REDNESS IN THE FACE and SHAME IS SOMETHING COVERING A PERSON) illustrate the shift towards a progressive embodiment of the new emotional standards brought by Christianization. According to these standards, rather than an external judgment or reproach, shame and guilt involve a negative evaluation of oneself. Furthermore, I argue here that these onomasiological changes are informing us on the lexical choices of Old English speakers and on the sociolinguistic factors that conditioned the development of new emotional styles (i.e., the different ways feelings were expressed and, surely, felt) in Anglo-Saxon England.

Keywords: emotions, Old English, conceptual variation, shame culture, metaphor, metonymy, guilt culture
Published online: 5 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.1.1.03dia
References
Arppe, A., Gillquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A
(2010) Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 6(1), 45–76.Google Scholar
Basson, A
(2006) Divine metaphors in selected Hebrew Psalms of Lamentation. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Benedict, R
(1946) The chrysanthemum and the sword: Patterns of Japanese culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Benson, B.L
(2011) Restitution for crime. In R. Hamowy (Ed.), The encyclopedia of libertarianism (pp. 427–429). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Blank, A
(1999) Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In A. Blank & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 61–89). Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buck, C.D
(1948) A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
CACELOE
(2013) Cognitively annotated corpus of emotional language: Old English. Ciudad Real: CACELOE Project.Google Scholar
Constable, G
(1971) Twelfth-century spirituality and the late middle ages. In J.O. Hardison (Ed.), Medieval and renaissance studies 5 (pp. 27–60). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A
(2003) Nature embodied: Gesture in ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Creighton, M.R
(1990) Revisiting shame and guilt cultures: A fourty-year pilgrimage. Ethos, 18(3), 279–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C
(1972/2005) The expression of the emotions in man and animals. New York, NY: Appelton.Google Scholar
Deignan, A
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delumeau, J
(1990) Sin and fear: The emergence of the western guilt culture, 13th-18th Centuries. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Díaz-Vera, J.E
(2011) Reconstructing the Old English cultural model for ‘fear’. Atlantis: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 33(1), 85–103.Google Scholar
DOEC
(2000) The dictionary of old english corpus in electronic form. Toronto: DOE Project.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Gevaert, C
(2008) Hearts and (angry) minds in old english. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven & N. Yu (Eds.), Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages (pp. 319–347). Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Gevaert, C
(2002) The evolution of the lexical and conceptual field of ‘anger’ in old and middle english. In J.E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), A changing world of words: Studies in english historical lexicology, lexicography and semantics (pp. 275–299). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
(2007) The history of anger: The lexical field of anger from old to early modern English. Doctoral Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
Hall, T.N
(2003) Ælfric and the Epistle to the Laodiceans. In K. Powell & D. Scragg (Eds.), Apocryphal texts and traditions (pp. 65–83). Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Hiebert, P.G
(1985) Anthropological insights for missionaries. Grand Rapics: Baker Book House.Google Scholar
Ho, D.Y.-F., Fu, W., & Ng, S.M
(2004) Guilt, shame and embarrassment: Revelations of face and self. Culture & Psychology, 10(1), 68–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G
(1991) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Holland, D., & Kipnis, A
(1995) American cultural models of embarrassment: The not-so egocentric self laid bare. In J.A. Russell, J.M. Fernández-Dols, A. Manstead & J.C. Wellenkamp (Eds.), Everyday conceptions of emotions: An introduction to the psychology, anthropology and linguistics of emotion (pp. 181–202). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izard, C.E
(1971) The psychology of emotions. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, G
(1989) The psychology of shame: Theory and treatment of shame-based syndromes. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kouchaki, M., Gino, F., & Jami, A
(2013) The gurden of guilt: Heavy backpacks, light snacks, and enhanced morality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1421, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2000) Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kytö, M
(1996) Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki corpus of English texts. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W.P
(1986) A gothic etymological dictionary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lewis, H.B
(1971) Shame and guilt in neurosis. Oxford: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M
(1995) Shame: The exposed self. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
MacGushin, P
(1992) Sallust, the histories, Volume 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malina, B.J
(2001) The new testament world: Insights from cultural anthropology. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte
2010 “Metaphor and metonymy.” In A.H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Historical pragmatics (pp. 193–215). Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, K.O
(1998) Body and law in late Anglo-Saxon England. Anglo-Saxon England, 271, 209–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, P.P
(1981) The Old-English prose psalms of the Paris Psalter. University of Pennyilvania: Dissertations available from ProQuest. Paper AAI8028879.Google Scholar
Owen-Croker, G.R
(1986) Dress in Anglo-Saxon England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Peristiani, J.G
(1966) Honor and shame: The values of mediterranean society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, J
(1954) Honour and social status. In J.G. Peristiani (Ed.), Honour and shame: The values of mediterranean societies (pp. 19–77). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J
(1959) Indogermanisches etymologisches wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Radden, G
(2003) How metonymic are metaphors? In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 407–434). Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Robbins, I.P
(2008) Digitus impudicus: The middle finger and the law. UC Davis Law Review, 411, 1403–1485.Google Scholar
Stanghellini, G., & Rosfort, R
(2013) Emotions and personhood: Exploring fragility - making sense of vulnerability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stearns, P.N
(1994) American cool: Constructing a twentieth-century emotional style. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A
(2004) ‘Happiness’ in English and German: A metaphorical-pattern analysis. In K. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 137–149). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Swanton, M.J
(1976) ‘Dane-Skins’: Excoriation in early England. Folklore, 87(1), 71–78.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J.P., Miller, R.S., Flicker, L., & Hill Barlow, D
(1996) Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(6), 1256–1269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, V
(2002) Dying and death in later Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Tissari, H
(2006) Conceptualizing shame: Investigating uses of the english word ‘shame’, 1418–1991. In R.W. McConchie, O. Timofeeva, H. Tissari & T. Säily (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2005 symposium on new approaches in English historical lexis (HEL-LEX) (pp. 143–154). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S.S
(1963) Affect imagery consciousness: Volume II, The negative affect. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Woolgar, C.M
(2006) The senses in late Medieval England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar