Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic StudiesVol. 1:2 (2014) ► pp.236–251
A corpus-based diachronic investigation of metaphorical containers of sadness in English
This paper addresses the question of conceptual diversity in the seat of emotions via a corpus-based case study of diachronic variation in the metaphorical containers of sadness in English. Data sourced from Literature Online, Early English Books Online and the British National Corpus reveal three types of metaphorical containers of sadness: (1) the human body in general and whatever is either literally internal to it, or at least often conceptualized as such, such as the heart and the soul; (2) external body parts and different kinds of superficial body features, such as the eyes and the voice; and (3) containers that are not inherently connected with the human body, such as a room and a sonnet. A comparison between the types of metaphorical containers in different periods shows that whereas the percentage of the third type of containers remains constant by and large, there has been a noticeable increase in the percentage of the second type of containers and a quite obvious decrease in the percentage of the first type of containers. It is argued that the diachronic variation in the relative frequencies of the two types of containers may have been related to a shift in the general conception of body and emotions, and specifically to the gradual disintegration of humoral theory.
Keywords: diachronic variation, sadness, humoral theory, metaphorical container
References (49)
Barr-Zisowitz, C. (2000). Sadness - Is there such a thing? In M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones & L.F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd edition) (pp. 607–622). New York and London: The Guilford Press.
Burton, R. 1621. The anatomy of melancholy. Retrieved January 7, 2010, from Literature Online. 
Coeffeteau, N. 1621. A table of humane passions with their causes and effects. Retrieved January 7, 2010, from Literature Online.
Cook, H.J. (1990). The new philosophy and medicine in seventeenth-century England. In D.C. Lindberg & R.S. Westman (Eds.), Reappraisals of the scientific revolution (pp. 397–436). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruttwell, P. (1951). Physiology and psychology in Shakespeare’s age. Journal of the History of Ideas, 121, 75–89.
Davitz, J.R. (1969). The language of emotion. New York and London: Academic Press.
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J.R. Taylor & R.E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153–179). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, D., & Gevaert, C. (2008). Hearts and (angry) minds in Old English. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Culture, body, and language: Conceptualization of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gevaert, C. (2002). The evolution of the lexical and conceptual field of ANGER in Old and Middle English. In J.E.D. Vera (Ed.), A changing world of words (pp. 275–299). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
. (2005). The anger is heat question: Detecting cultural influence on the conceptualization of anger through diachronic corpus analysis. In N. Delbecque, J. v. d. Auwera & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative (pp. 195–208). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Glynn, D. (2002). Love and anger: The grammatical structure of conceptual metaphors. Style, 36(3), 541–559.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, B. (1989). The conceptual structure of emotional experience in Chinese. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. New York and Hong Kong: Springer-Verlag.
. (1995). Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence. In J.R. Taylor & R.E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construl of the world (pp. 181–196). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (1998). Are there any emotion-specific metaphors? In A. Athanasiadou & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualization and expression (pp. 127–151). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lazarus, R.S., & Lazarus., B.N. (1994). Passion and reason. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lutz, C., & White, G.M. (1986). The anthropology of emotions. Annual Review of Anthropology, 151, 405–436.
Maalej, Z. (2004). Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 51–75.
Matsuki, K. (1995). Metaphors of anger in Japanese. In J. Taylor & R.E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 137–151). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McVeigh, B. (1996). Standing stomachs, clamoring chests and cooling livers: Metaphors in the psychological lexicon of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 261, 25–50.
Mikołajczuk, A. (1998). The metonymic and metaphorical conceptulisation of anger in Polish. In A. Athanasiadou & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptulisation and expression (pp. 153–190). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Niemeier, S. (2008). To be in control: Kind-hearted and cool-headed. The head-heart dichotomy in English. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Culture, body, and language: Conceptualization of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Paster, G.K. (2001). The body and its passions. Shakespeare Studies, 291, 44–51.
. (2004). Humoring the body: Emotions and the Shakespearean stage. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Peña Cerval, M.S. (2003). Topology and cognition: What image-schemas reveal about the metaphorical language of emotions. Muenchen: LINCOME GmbH.
Pope, M. (1985). Shakespeare’s medical imagination. Shakespeare Survey, 381, 175–186.
Power, M., & Dalgleish, T. (2007). Cognition and emotion: From order to disorder. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
Rather, L.J. (1968). The “six things non-natural”: A note on the origins and fate of a doctrine and a phrase. Clio Medica, 31, 337–347.
Russell, J.B. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.
Schmidt, J. (2001). Melancholy and the therapeutic language of moral philosophy in seventeenth-Century thought. Journal of the History of Ideas, 65(4), 583–601.
Siraisi, N.G. (1990). Medieval and early renaissance medicine: An introduction to knowledge and practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Stearns, C.Z. (2009). “Lord help me walk humbly”: Anger and sadness in England and America, 1570-1750. In J. Harding & E.D. Pribram (Eds.), Emotions: A cultural studies reader (pp. 170–190). London and New York: Routledge.
Stearns, P.N. (1994). American cool. New York: New York University Press.
. (2000). History of emotions: Issues of change and impact. In M. Lewis & J.M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd edition). New York and London: The Guilford Press.
Steen, G. (2002). Towards a procedure for metaphor identification. Language and Literature, 111, 17–34.
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S.T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 63–105). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sutton, J. (2003). Porous memory and the cognitive life of things. In A. Jonson & A. Cavallaro (Eds.), Prefiguring cyberculture: An intellectual history (pp. 130–141). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, J.R., & Mbense, T.G. (1998). Red dogs and rottern mealies: How Zulu talk about anger. In A. Athanasiadou & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualisation and expression (pp. 191–226). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Temkin, O. (1973). Galenism: Rise and decline of a medical philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
von Staden, H. (2000). Body, soul, and nerves: Epicurus, herophilus, erasistratus, the stoics, and galen. In J.P. Wright & P. Potter (Eds.), Psyche and soma: Physicians and metaphysicians on the mind-body problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment (pp. 79–116). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(2), 59–92.