Article published in:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 2:2 (2015) ► pp. 349360
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Banaruee, Hassan, Hooshang Khoshsima, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Afsane Askari & Mireille Besson
2017. Suppression of semantic features in metaphor comprehension. Cogent Psychology 4:1 Crossref logo
Banaruee, Hassan, Hooshang Khoshsima, Esmail Zare-Behtash, Nahid Yarahmadzehi & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2019. Types of metaphors and mechanisms of comprehension. Cogent Education 6:1 Crossref logo
Gathigia, Moses Gatambuki, Ruiming Wang, Manqiong Shen, Carlos Tirado, Oksana Tsaregorodtseva, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Ricardo Minervino & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2018. A cross-linguistic study of metaphors of death. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:2  pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Hassan Banaruee, Zahra Eskandari & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2019. Isomorphism: Abstract and Concrete Representations. Activitas Nervosa Superior 61:3  pp. 152 ff. Crossref logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Zahra Eskandari, Yousef Bakhshizadeh-Gashti, Sedigheh Vahdat & Hassan Banaruee
2019. An algebraic perspective on abstract and concrete domains. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2  pp. 354 ff. Crossref logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Hooshang Khoshsima & Nahid Yarahmadzehi
2018. Suppression from the Perspective of Distributed Models of Conceptual Representation. Activitas Nervosa Superior 60:3-4  pp. 90 ff. Crossref logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Hooshang Khoshsima, Nahid Yarahmadzehi & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2019. The Impact of Metaphorical Prime on Metaphor Comprehension Processes. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:3  pp. 375 ff. Crossref logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Nahid Yarahmadzehi & Hassan Banaruee
2018. A Neuropsychological Perspective on Deep or Abstract Homogeneity Among Concretely Different Systems. Activitas Nervosa Superior 60:2  pp. 68 ff. Crossref logo
Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Babak Yazdani-Fazlabadi, Carlos Tirado & Eyal Sagi
2017. Embodied concept mapping. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:2  pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Bowdle, B.F., & Gentner, D.
(1999) Metaphor comprehension: From comparison to categorization. In M. Hahn & S.C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of twenty-first annual conference of cognitive science society (pp. 90–95). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., & Gentner, D.
(1989) The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
(1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Clement, C.A.
(1988) Evidence for relational selectivity in interpreting analogy and metaphor. In G.H. Bower (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B.
(1990) Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 401–424). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M.S., & Manfredi, D.
(1997) Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Manfredi. D.A., & McGlone, M.S.
(1997) Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create categories. In T.B Wards, S.M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual metaphors and processes (pp. 326–350). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M.R., & Goldvarg, Y.
(1997) Filtering out irrelevant material during metaphor comprehension. In M.G. Shafto & P. Langely (Eds.), Proceeding of 19th annual conference of the cognitive society (p. 932). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
(2001) Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor & Symbol, 16, 277–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S.
(2001) Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L., & Estes, Z.
(2005) Metaphor comprehension as attributive categorization. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 110–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., & Glucksberg, S.
(1992) Metaphor and communication. Poetics Today, 13, 632–658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G.L.
(1997) Polysemy and the creation of novel word meanings. In T.B. Wards, S.M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 235–265). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y.
(1992) Metaphors and categories. Poetics Today, 13, 771–794. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., & Rips, L.
(1991) Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 452–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar