Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 9:2 (2022) ► pp.202–222

What does image schema facilitate in English L2 vocabulary processing?

The effectiveness of schematic visual aids for the enhancement of metaphoric competence in learning phrasal verbs

ORCID logo | Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
ORCID logo | Osaka Metropolitan University
ORCID logo | Meisei University

This study aims to examine the effectiveness of image-schema-oriented visual aids to cohesively process the semantic information of English (L2) phrasal verbs (PVs), leading to the proper understanding of their senses. As previous studies suggested the advantage of image-schema-based L2 vocabulary learning, our study hypothesizes that image-schema-oriented visual aids in a multimedia environment can develop the motivated semantic networks of L2 PVs, leading to their successful processing and comprehension. To verify the hypothesis, we administered two empirical studies to Japanese undergraduates learning with image-schema-oriented visual aids. Although they were administered in different settings, both studies showed that the participants could obtain significant learning gains, especially figurative meanings. This finding suggests that the use of image-schema-oriented aids could successfully process semantic information of L2 PVs enough to develop a motivated semantic network and reconfirm the significance of image schema in terms of enhancing learners’ metaphoric competence.

Keywords: L2 phrasal verbs, image-schema-oriented visual aids, literal and figurative meanings, metaphoric competence, multimedia learning
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature
    • 2.1Phrasal verbs
    • 2.2Image schema as visual aids for polysemous words
    • 2.3Image schema as a computational visual aid
  • 3.Research
    • 3.1Research questions
    • 3.2Research 1
      • 3.2.1Participants
      • 3.2.2Target PVs
      • 3.2.3Treatment
      • 3.2.4Procedures
      • 3.2.5Analysis
      • 3.2.6Results
    • 3.3Research 2
      • 3.3.1Participants
      • 3.3.2Material
      • 3.3.3Treatment
      • 3.3.4Procedures
      • 3.3.5Findings
  • 4.Conclusion and discussion
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.20022.sat
References
Abraham, L.
(2008) Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21 (3), 199–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akbary, M., Shahriari, H., & Hosseini, F. A.
(2018) The value of song lyrics for teaching and learning English phrasal verbs: a corpus investigation of four music genres. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12 (4), 344–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aldera, A. S., & Mohsen, M. A.
(2013) Annotations in captioned animation: Effects on vocabulary learning and listening skills. Computers and Education, 68 1, 60–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alejo-González, R.
(2010) Making sense of phrasal verbs: A cognitive linguistic account of L2 learning. AILA Review, 23 (1), 50–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blais, M. J., & Gonnerman, L. M.
(2013) Explicit and implicit semantic processing of verb-particle constructions by French-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (4), 829–846. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.
(2008) Opening chapter: How cognitive linguistics can foster effective vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp.1–64). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
(2012) Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32 1, 83–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Píriz, A. M. P., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J.
(2009) Does pictorial elucidation foster recollection of idioms?. Language Teaching Research, 13 (4), 367–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Warren, P., Grimshaw, G., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
(2017) On the benefits of multimodal annotations for vocabulary uptake from reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30 (7), 709–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brett, P.
(1998) Using multimedia: A descriptive investigation of incidental language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11 (2), 179–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condon, N.
(2008) How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs. In F. Boers. & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 133–158). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dewell, R. B.
(1994)  Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (4), 351–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R.
(2001) English phrasal verbs: Theory and didactic application. In Pütz, M., S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy (pp. 3–28). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M.
(2007) Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41 (2), 339–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garnier, M., & Schmitt, N.
(2015) The PHaVE List: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses. Language Teaching Research, 19 (6), 645–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Picking up polysemous phrasal verbs: How many do learners know and what facilitates this knowledge?. System, 59 1, 29–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gießler, R.
(2012) Teacher language awareness and cognitive linguistics (CL): Building a CL-inspired perspective on teaching lexis in EFL student teachers. Language Awareness, 21 (1–2), 113–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G.
(2015) The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners. A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11 (1), 51–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holme, R.
(2012) Cognitive Linguistics and the Second Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 46 (1), 6–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y. M., Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Lin, Y. T.
(2012) A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58 (1), 273–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) Body in the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovács, É.
(2011) The Traditional vs. Cognitive Approach to English Phrasal Verbs. Journal of Linguistics, 1 (2), 141–160.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Woman, fire and dangerous things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lam, Y.
(2009) Applying cognitive linguistics to teaching the Spanish prepositions por and para . Language Awareness, 18 (1), 2–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liao, Y., & Fukuya, Y. J.
(2004) Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English. Language learning, 54 (2), 193–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S.
(1996) Prepositions: Meaning and methods. ELT Journal, 50 (3), 225–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Preposition entries in UK monolingual learners’ dictionaries: Problems and possible solutions. Applied Linguistics, 22 (1), 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F.
(2005) From movement to metaphor with manner‑of‑movement verbs. Applied Linguistics, 26 (2), 241–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks. Applied Linguistics, 29 (2), 200–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2001) Metaphoric competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style?. TESOL Quarterly, 35 (3), 459–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Item-based and cognitive-style-based variation in students’ abilities to use metaphoric extension strategies. IBERICA, 7 1, 5–31.Google Scholar
(2009) Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G.
(2006) Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27 (2), 268–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, D.
(2011) The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: A multicorpus examination. TESOL Quarterly, 45 (4), 661–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Z., & Sun, J.
(2017) Presenting English polysemous phrasal verbs with two metaphor-based cognitive methods to Chinese EFL learners. System, 69 1, 153–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahpeykar, N., & Tyler, A.
(2015) A principled Cognitive Linguistics account of English phrasal verbs with up and out. Language and Cognition, 7 (1), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Tian, J.
(2010) Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14 (4), 397–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pachler, N.
(2001) Electronic reference tools for foreign language learners, teachers and users: Offline vocabulary look-up programs. The Language Learning Journal, 24 (1), 24–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paulmann, S., Ghareeb-Ali, Z., & Felser, C.
(2015) Neurophysiological Markers of Phrasal Verb Processing: Evidence from L1 and L2 Speakers. In R. Heredia & A. Cieślicka (Eds.), Bilingual Figurative Language Processing (pp. 245–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H.
(1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp.191–225). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peters, E.
(2016) The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20 (1), 113–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, S.
(2003) Growth of a lexical network: Nine English prepositions in acquisition. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven & J. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics (pp. 243–280). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B.
(2003) Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryoo, M. L.
(2013) A Corpus-based Study of the Use of Phrasal Verbs in Korean EFL Students’ Writing. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 10 (2), 63–89.Google Scholar
Sato, T.
(2016a) Applicability of technology-enhanced visual glosses for explicit L2 vocabulary learning: The enhancement of metaphoric competence through the learning of English polysemous words. Ampersand, 3 1, 43–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Could a multimodal dictionary serve as a learning tool? An examination of the impact of technologically enhanced visual glosses on L2 text comprehension. The EuroCALL Review, 24 (2), 3–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, T., & Suzuki, A.
(2010) Do multimedia-oriented visual glosses really facilitate EFL vocabulary learning?: A comparison of planar images with three- dimensional images. Asian EFL Journal, 12 (4), 160–172.Google Scholar
Sato, T., Lai, Y., & Burden, T.
(2022) The role of individual factors in L2 vocabulary learning with cognitive-linguistics-based static and dynamic visual aids. ReCALL, 34(2), 201–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, S., Takeda, S., & Kawade, S.
(Eds.) (2003) E-gate English-Japanese dictionary. Tokyo: Benesse Corporation.Google Scholar
Trebits, A.
(2009) The most frequent phrasal verbs in English language EU documents–A corpus-based analysis and its implications. System, 37 (3), 470–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
(2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vilkaite, L., & Schmitt, N.
(2019) Reading collocations in an L2: Do collocation processing benefits extend to non-adjacent collocations?. Applied Linguistics, 40 (2), 329–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, B. J.
(2012) A Conceptual Approach to the Instruction of Phrasal Verbs. Modern Language Journal, 96 (3), 419–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, M. H. I., Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B.
(2018) A Cognitive Linguistics Application for Second Language Pedagogy: The English Preposition Tutor. Language Learning, 68 (2), 438–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, A.
(2012) What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32 1, 231–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yasuda, S.
(2010) Learning phrasal verbs through conceptual metaphors: A case of Japanese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 44 (2), 250–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshii, M., & Flaitz, J.
(2002) Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of text and picture annotation types. CALICO Journal, 20 (1), 33–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zareva, A.
(2016) Multi-word verbs in student academic presentations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23 1, 83–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar