Winespeak in wine’s pics
How metaphor and metonymy construct a visual winespeak narrative in the manga Drops of God
This study investigates how wine pics construct visual winespeak through investigating the metaphor and metonymy
in the Japanese manga,
Drops of God. The study demonstrated that metonymy has the indicational function to help
others understand the winespeak quicker and can be elaborated as a visual metaphor as suggested in previous studies (Isabel Negro
Alousque 2015;
Zahra Kashanizadeh & Charles
Forceville 2020). Two metonymies related to winespeak include the smell and mouthfeel of the wine. Four common source
domains of metaphor in visual winespeak,
human, nature, art
, and
activity
have been identified. The study further utilized the Visual Narrative Grammar (VNG) proposed
by Neil Cohn (
2013a,
2013b,
2015,
2020) to examine the roles of metaphor
and metonymy in visual winespeak. Visual winespeak can be deconstructed as establisher, initial, prolongation, peak, and release.
Findings suggest that the VNG corresponds with the procedure of wine tasting, which involves attack, evolution, and
aftertaste (Rosario Caballero, Ernesto Suárez-Toste & Carita Paradis 2019;
Adrienne Lehrer
2009). Also, results show that it is possible to predict the positions of metonymy and metaphor in a narrative of
visual winespeak. Metonymy usually occurs in the establisher, and metaphor tends to be presented in the peak. Their positions in a
narrative further indicate their function. The usage of metonymy aims to set up a concrete and general setting, and metaphor is
used to create a climax. In general, the findings show that, although metaphor and metonymy play different roles in a narrative,
they co-construct a comprehensive and detailed visual narrative to elaborate a winespeak.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology
- 2.1Research material – Japanese winespeak manga “Drops of God”
- 2.2Visual Narrative Grammar (VNG)
- 3.Visual metonymy and metaphor in winespeak manga
- 3.1Metonymy
- 3.2Metaphor
-
human
-
nature
-
art
-
activity
- 4.Applying VNG: The roles of metonymy and metaphor in a visual narrative
- 4.1Meeting the Cleopatra
- 4.2First love’s tears
- 5.Conclusion
- Conflict of interest statement
- Notes
-
References
References (38)
References
Alousque, I. N. (2015). Visual wine metaphor and metonymy in ads. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,
173
1, 125–131.
Bratož, S. (2013). The anthropomorphic metaphor in Slovene and English wine tasting discourses. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries,
10
(1), 23–35.
Caballero, R. (2007). Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics,
39
(12), 2095–2114.
Caballero, R. (2009). Cutting across the senses: Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. In C. J. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 73–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Caballero, R., & Suárez-Toste, E. (2008). Translating the senses: Teaching the metaphors in winespeak. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 241–260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cohn, N. (2013a). The visual language of comics: Introduction to the structure and cognition of sequential images. London: Bloomsbury.
Cohn, N. (2013b). Visual narrative structure. Cognitive science,
37
(3), 413–452.
Cohn, N. (2015). How to analyze visual narratives: A tutorial in Visual Narrative Grammar. Online: [URL] [last accessed: 1 March 2016].
Cohn, N. (2020). Who understands comics?: Questioning the universality of visual language comprehension. London: Bloomsbury.
Creed, A. (2013). Wine and metaphor: Cross-cultural [dis]harmony. In W. Midgley, K. Trimmer & A. Davies (Eds.), Metaphors for, in and of education research (pp. 10–25). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Creed, A. (2016). Wine communication in a global market: A study of metaphor through the genre of Australian wine reviews. PhD dissertation. Australia: University of Southern Queensland.
Ehrlichman, H., & Halpern, J. N. (1988). Affect and memory -- Effects of pleasant and unpleasant odors on retrieval of happy and unhappy memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
55
(5), 769–779.
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gluck, M. (2003). Wine language. Useful idiom or idiot-speak. New media language, 107–115.
Herz, R. S., & Engen, T. (1996). Odor memory: Review and analysis. Psychon Bull Rev,
3
(3), 300–313.
Herz, R. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2002). A naturalistic study of autobiographical memories evoked by olfactory and visual cues: testing the Proustian hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology,
115
(1), 21–32.
Hsu, I., & Chiang, W.-Y. (2021). ‘Seeing’ music from manga: Visualizing music with embodied mechanisms of musical experience. Visual Communication,
21
(4), 624–644.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2019). New extensions of conceptual metaphor theory: How they apply to visual metaphors. In A. Benedek & K. Nyíri (Eds.), Image and metaphor in the new century (pp. 3–16). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics (includes Cognitive Linguistic Bibliography),
9
(1), 37–78.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lehrer, A. (2007). Can wines be brawny? Reflections on wine vocabulary. In B. C. Smith (Ed.), Questions of taste: The philosophy of wine. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lehrer, A. (2009). Wine and conversation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Majid, A., & Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition,
130
(2), 266–270.
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2013). Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol,
28
(1), 22–40.
Rubin, D. C., Groth, E., & Goldsmith, D. J. (1984). Olfactory cuing of autobiographical memory. The American journal of psychology,
97
(4), 493–507.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Díez Velasco, O. I. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Smith, B. C. (2007). The objectivity of tastes and tasting. In B. C. Smith (Ed.), Questions of taste: The philosophy of wine (pp. 41–77). New York: Oxford University Press.
Suárez-Toste, E. (2007). Metaphor inside the wine cellar: On the ubiquity of personification schemas in winespeak. Metaphorik. de,
12
(1), 53–64.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure (Vol. 541). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Winter, B. (2016). Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience,
31
(8), 975–988.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Elyamany, Nashwa & Maha SalahEldien Mohamed Hamed
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.