Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic StudiesVol. 10:1 (2023) ► pp.99–116
The image schemas of container and source-path-goal in the theory of psychodynamic defense mechanisms
In this article, we evaluated the theory of defense mechanisms from the cognitive linguistics perspective. We chose two basic image schemas of container and path-goal and reviewed three psychodynamic psychotherapy textbooks and two psychology dictionaries to extract passages defining defense mechanisms by one of the selected image schemas. Seventeen defense mechanisms were extracted, categorized, and discussed according to their underlying image schemas. In conclusion, we suggest that the development of the defense mechanisms could be traced back to the early interactions of an infant with the physical environment. Moreover, there might be a relationship between the adaptive levels of the defense mechanisms and the chronological development of image schemas in an infant’s mind, e.g., defenses defined using the image schema of container are usually less adaptive than defenses defined using the image schema of path-goal.
Keywords: defense mechanisms, psychodynamic theory, cognitive linguistics, image schema, early cognitive development
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Results
- Defense mechanisms that are conceptualized by the image schema of container
- Defense mechanisms that are defined by image schema of source-path-goal
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Limitations
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (33)
Bowins, B. (2004). Psychological defense mechanisms: A new perspective. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis,
64
1, 1–26. 
Cabaniss, D. L., Cherry, S., Douglas, C. J., & Schwartz, A. R. (2011). Psychodynamic psychotherapy: A clinical manual. New Jersey: Wiley.
Colman, A. M. (2015). A dictionary of psychology (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cramer, P. (2008). Seven pillars of defense mechanism theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,
2
(5), 1963–1981.
(2015). Defense mechanisms: 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Personality Assessment,
97
(2), 114–122.
David, B. (2006). Psychodynamic theory for clinicians. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Dictionary, C. (2020). English dictionary, translations & thesaurus. Available from: [URL]
Dimitrijević, A. (2020). Defense mechanisms, contemporary perspectives. In B. J. Carducci, C. S. Nave, A. D. Fabio, D. H. Saklofske & C. Stough (Eds.), The Wiley encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (volumn III) (pp. 113–117). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Frank, R. M., Dirven, R., Ziemke, T., & Bernárdez, E. (Eds.). (2008). Body, language and mind volume 2: Sociocultural situatedness. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Franks, D. D. (2019). The Post-Freudian unconscious: Agency and awareness. In D. D. Franks (Ed.), Neurosociology: Fundamentals and current finding (pp. 65–82). Amsterdam: Springer Dordrecht.
Freud, S. (1964). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Oxford/England: Macmillan.
Freud, A. (2018). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. London: Routledge.
Gabbard, G. O. (2004). Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy : A basic text. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2003). Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language,
84
(1), 1–15.
Hampe, B. (2008). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Harper, D. (2001). Online etymology dictionary. Available from: [URL]
Hespos, S. J., & Baillargeon, R. (2001). Reasoning about containment events in very young infants. Cognition,
78
(3), 207–245.
Johnson, M. (2013). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kernberg, O. (2008). Contemporary controversies in psychoanalytic theory, techniques, and their appli. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Knox, J. M. (2001). Memories, fantasies, archetypes: An exploration of some connections between cognitive science and analytical psychology. The Journal of Analytical Psychology,
46
(4), 613–635.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. conceptual primitives. Psychological Review,
99
(4), 587–604.
(2008). How to build a baby: III. image schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 137–163). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mandler, J. M., & Cánovas, C. P. (2014). On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition,
6
(4), 510–532.
Mihalits, D. S., & Codenotti, M. (2020). The conceptual tragedy in studying defense mechanisms. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
54
1, 354–569.
Piaget, J. (2013). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. London: Routledge.
Tay, D. (2016). Metaphor and psychological transference. Metaphor and Symbol,
31
(1), 11–30.
(2017). Time series analysis of discourse: A case study of metaphor in psychotherapy sessions. Discourse Studies,
19
(6), 694–710.
(2019). Time series analysis of discourse: Method and case studies. London: Routledge.
(2021). Image schemas. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 161–172). London: Routledge.
Vaillant, G. E. (1995). Adaptation to life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
VandenBos, G. R. (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Yamaguchi, M., Tay, D., & Blount, B. (Eds.). (2014). Approaches to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of Cognitive Linguistics and linguistic anthropology. London: Palgrave Macmillan London.