Responsive strategies and self-identity construction in “Versailles Humblebragging” on Chinese social media
Versailles humblebragging is becoming an increasingly pervasive pragmatic and linguistic phenomenon since late 2020 in face-to-face and social media communication in China. Despite its ubiquity, there is a relative paucity of empirical research on this new phenomenon, particularly on the reactions of followers in the digital communicative context and the self-identities constructed by the posters, as well as the theoretical limitations to explicate the social cognitive factors behind the novel pragmatic behavior. This study integrated pragmatic and social cognitive theories to conduct quantitative and qualitative analyses of the responsive strategies followers used and the self-identity the humblebraggers built in this phenomenon. Based on the data retrieved from Chinese social media Weibo, we have found generally two major types of responsive strategies, namely the explicit and implicit. A majority of followers employed the implicit strategies to express their acceptance and liking with a preponderance of clicking the “like” affordance, suggesting that Versailles humblebragging helps to build good interpersonal relationship on Weibo. We have also identified seven types of self-identities and explored the underlying factors from the perspective of social cognition. It might be concluded from the findings that certain social and cultural shared beliefs, values and patterns of life are potent factors in shaping Chinese posters’ interpretation of themselves and other people.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Self-praise and Versailles humblebragging
- 2.1Self-praise in face-to-face communication and social networking sites
- 2.2Versailles humblebragging
- 3.Social cognition, self-concept and self-identity
- 4.Methodology
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1The results of responsive strategies
- 5.1.1Explicit response of acceptance
- 5.1.2Explicit response of rejection
- 5.1.3Explicit Response of Evading
- 5.1.4Implicit self-praise response
- 5.2The results of constructed self-identities
- 5.3Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
-
References
References (56)
References
Austin, J. L. (1976). How to do things with words: The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the ‘true self’ on the internet. Journal of Social Issues,
58
(1), 33–48.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dayter, D. (2014). Self-praise in microblogging. Journal of Pragmatics,
61
1, 91–102.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2017). Social Cognition: From brains to culture (3rd edition). London: SAGE.
Gallup, G. G. (1970). Chimpanzees: Self-recognition. Science,
167
(3914), 86–87.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Grodin, D., & Lindlof, T. R. (1996). Constructing the self in a mediated world. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Guo, Y., & Ren, W. (2020). Managing image: The self-praise of celebrities on social media. Discourse, Context & Media,
38
1, 100433.
Holtgraves, T. M., & Kashima, Y. (2008). Language, meaning, and social cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
12
(1), 73–94.
Horowitz, M. J. (2012). Self-identity theory and research methods. Journal of Research Practice,
8
(2), M14.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
Jones, E. E., Davis, K. E., & Gergen, K. G. (1961). Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
63
(2), 302–310.
Kim, J., & Dindia, K. (2011). Online self-disclosure: A review of research. In K. B. Wright & L. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 156–180). New York: Peter Lang.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2013). “Just click ‘like’”: Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments. Journal of Pragmatics,
51
1, 47–67.
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2021). “Blowing our own trumpet”: Self-praise in Peninsular Spanish face-to-face communication. Journal of Pragmatics,
183
1, 107–120.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review,
98
(2), 224–253.
Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 858–866.
Matley, D. (2018). ‘‘This is NOT a #humblebrag, this is just a #brag”: The pragmatics of self-praise, hashtags and politeness in Instagram posts. Discourse, Context & Media,
22
1, 30–38.
Mey, J. L., Haberland, H., & Fisher, K. (2010). Editorial. Pragmatics and Society,
1
(1), 1–8.
Miller, L. C., Cooke, L. L., Tsang, J., & Morgan, F. (1992). Should I brag? Nature and impact of positive and boastful disclosures for women and men. Human Communication Research,
18
(3), 364–399.
Moon, J. H., Lee, E., Lee, J.-A., Choi, T. R., & Sung, Y. (2016). The role of narcissism in self-promotion on Instagram. Personal and Individual Differences,
101
1, 22–25.
Morling, B., & Masuda, T. (2012). Social cognition in real worlds: Cultural psychology and social cognition. In S. T. Fiske, & C. N. Macrae (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Cognition (pp. 429–450). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Owens, T. J. (2006). Self and identity. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 205–232). New York: Springer.
Oyserman, D., & Packer, M. J. (1996). Social cognition and self-concept: A socially contextualized model of identity. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 175–201). London: Sage Publications.
Papacharissi, Z. (2011). A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge.
Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79–112). New York: Academic Press.
Povinelli, D. J., Landau, K. R., & Perilloux, H. K. (1996). Self-recognition in young children using delayed versus live feedback: Evidence of a developmental asynchrony. Child Development,
67
(4), 1540–1554.
Ran, Y. (2011). Multidimentional features of contemporary pragmatics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research,
43
(
5
), 763–771.
Ren, W., & Guo, Y. (2021). What is “Versailles literature”?: Humblebrags on Chinese social networking sites. Journal of Pragmatics,
184
1, 185–195.
Ren, W., & Guo, Y. (2020). Self-praise on Chinese social networking sites. Journal of Pragmatics,
169
1, 179–189.
Samandar, R., Hadidi, Y., & Yaghoubi-Notash, M. (2022). “I am well-versed and Skillful in Teaching English”: Self-praise Strategies on Instagram Bios of Iranian English language teachers. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation,
5
(3), 1–10.
Searle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Speech acts and illocutionary logic. In D. Vanderveken (Ed.), Logic, thought and action (pp. 109–132). DorDrecht: Springer.
Sekhon, T., Bickart, B., Trudel, R., & Fournier, S. (2015). Being a likable braggart: How consumers use brand mentions for self-presentation on social media. In C. V. Dimofte, C. P. Haugtvedt & R. F. Yalch (Eds.), Consumer psychology in a social media world (pp. 1–32). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Sezer, O., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2017). Humblebragging: A distinct – and ineffective – self-presentation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
114
(1), 52–74.
Simon, B. (2004). Identity in modern society: A social psychological perspective. MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Speer, S. A. (2012). The interactional organization of self-praise: Epistemics, preference organization, and implications for identity research. Social Psychology Quarterly,
75
(1), 52–79.
Stets, J. E., & Serpe, R. T. (2013). Identity theory. In J. DeLamater & A. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 31–60). New York: Springer.
Stryker, S. (1987). Identity theory: Developments and extensions. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.), Self and identity: Psychosocial perspectives (pp. 89–103). New York: Wiley.
Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts?. Social Psychology Quarterly,
57
(1), 16–35.
Sung, Y., Lee, J., Kim, E., & Choi, S. M. (2016). Why we post selfies: Understanding motivations for posting pictures of oneself. Personality and Individual Differences,
97
1, 260–265.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tobback, E. (2019). Telling the world how skillful you are: Self-praise strategies on LinkedIn. Discourse & Community,
13
(6), 647–668.
Underwood, K. (2011). Facework as self-heroicisation: A case study of three elderly women. Journal of Pragmatics,
43
(8), 2215–2242.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
18
(1), 1–5.
Wen, X. (2019). 基于“社会认知”的社会认知语言学 [Sociocognitive linguistics based on social cognition]. Modern Foreign Languages,
42
(3), 293–305.
Wittels, H. (2012). Humblebrag: The art of false modesty. New York, NY: Grand Central Publishing.
Wu, R. R. (2011). A conversation analysis of self-praising in everyday Mandarin interaction. Journal of Pragmatics,
43
(13), 3152–3176.
Yang, L., & Gao, Q. (2021). 网络新式文学之“凡尔赛文学”语用预设探析 [The pragmatic presupposition of “Versailles literature”]. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Humanities and Social Sciences),
18
(4), 116–119.
Yuan, Z. (2018). Exploring Chinese college students’ construction of online identity on the Sina Microblog. Discourse, Context & Media,
26
1, 43–51.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Guo, Yaping & Wei Ren
2024.
Responses to self-praise on Chinese social media.
Discourse & Communication 18:3
► pp. 351 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.