The notion of gradation in meaning
An inquiry in Cognitive Grammar
This paper is about gradation of meaning in English, the situation in which the degree of the quality of a word increases or decreases, caused conceptually by communicative demands and expressed lexically by other words called degree adverbs. The choice of a degree adverb reflects the speaker's viewpoint and influences the listener’s reception of the message. With reference to this phenomenon, the paper explores three fundamental tenets of Cognitive Grammar. The first is that a linguistic item forms a category of interrelated senses. On this basis, degree adverbs are argued to acquire new senses relative to context of use. The second is that the meaning of a linguistic item is best understood in terms of the domain to which it belongs. On this basis, degree adverbs are argued to form sets in which they highlight different facets. The third is that the use of a linguistic item is motivated by the particular construal imposed on a scene. On this basis, the use of a degree adverb is argued to result from the particular construal the speaker chooses to describe a situation. Degree adverbs are found to be linguistic devices used to fine-tune a stance. A change in a stance requires a change in a degree adverb.
References (20)
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, Finegan, Edward, & Quirk, Randolph (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written english. Essex: Longman.
Bolinger, Dwight. (1972). Degree words. Paris: Mouten.
Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary. (2003). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamawand, Zeki. (2011). Morphology in English: Word formation in cognitive grammar. London: Continuum.
Hamawand, Zeki. (2016). Semantics: A cognitive account of linguistic meaning. London: Equinox.
Huddleston, Rodney, & Geoffrey Pullum. (2005). A student’s introduction to English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald. (1988). A view of linguistic semantics. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 49–90). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Langacker, Ronald. (1991a). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 2. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald. (1991b). Concept, image and symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald. (1999). Grammar and conceptualisation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey, et al. (2001). An A-Z of english grammar and usage. Essex: Longman.
Longman dictionary of contemporary English. (2009). Harlow: Pearson.
Merriam Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary.
Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. (2005). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peters, Pam. (2004). The Cambridge guide to English usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, Svartvik, Jan, & Crystal, David. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of English language. London: Longman.
Swan, Michael. (2005). Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teschner, Richard V., & Eston E. Evans. (2007). Analyzing the grammar of English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Pan, Yun
2022.
Intensification for discursive evaluation: a corpus-pragmatic view.
Text & Talk 42:3
► pp. 391 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.