Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 3:2 (2016) ► pp.259276
Aveledo, F., & Athanasopoulos, P
(2015) Second language influence on first language motion event encoding and categorization in Spanish-speaking children learning L2 English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(4), 403–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, J
(2011) An aspectual analysis of ditransitive verbs of caused possession in English. Journal of Semantics, 28(1), 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N.J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F.K
(2007) Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83(3), 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M
(2008) Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1-L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(2), 225–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calvin, W.H
(1983) The throwing Madonna: Essays on the brain. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Davies, M
(2011) The corpus of contemporary American English. Retrieved from [URL]
Fifer, F.C
(1987) The adoption of bipedalism by the hominids: A new hypothesis. Human Evolution, 2(2), 135–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gao, H
(2001) The physical foundation of the patterning of physical action verbs: A study of Chinese verbs. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.Google Scholar
Gao, H.H., Wang, H., & Nicoladis, E
(2016) The delineation of ‘throw’ verbs in Chinese: A behavioral and perceptual approach. Journal of Cognitive Science. 17(1), 95–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanson, C., & Hanson, S.J
(2005) Categorization in neuroscience: brain response to objects and events. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 119–140). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohenstein, J.M
(2005) Language-related motion event similarities in English-and Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(3), 403–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hovav, M.R., & Levin, B
(2008) The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics, 44(1), 129–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Institute for German Language
(2012) Das Deutsche Referenzkorpus [The Mannheim German Reference Corpus]. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Jessen, M
(2013) Semantic categories in the domain of motion verbs by adult speakers of Danish, German, and Turkish. Linguistik Online, 61(4), 57–78.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A
(2010) Motion events in Polish. In V. Hasko & R. Perelmutter (Eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion (pp. 225–246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Gullberg, M., Staden, M.V., & Bowerman, M
(2007) How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(2), 179–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Boster, J.S., & Bowerman, M
(2008) The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking. Cognition, 109(2), 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B.C., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Tsuda, N., & Majid, A
(2008) Talking about walking biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science, 19(3), 232–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B.C., Ameel, E., Imai, M., Gennari, S.P., Saji, N., & Majid, A
(2014) Human locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 741, 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L.R., Eisenberg, A.R., Kako, E.T., Highter, M., & McGraw, N
(1998) Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(5), 521–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Committee of Chinese Language
(2008) Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L
(2002) Shake, rattle,‘n’roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84(2), 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition, 98(3), B75–B87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S
(2010) Lexical and structural biases in the acquisition of motion verbs. Language Learning and Development, 6(2), 87–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J
(2008) Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108(1), 155–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 31, 57–149.Google Scholar
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vulchanova, M., Martinez, L., & Vulchanov, V
(2012) Distinctions in the linguistic encoding of motion: Evidence from a free naming task. In M. Vulchanova & E. van der Zee (Eds.), Motion encoding in language and space (pp. 11–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J.C., & Papafragou, A
(2010) Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 64–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Gao, Helena Hong
2020. Mandarin Speakers’ Conceptualization of Force and Motion in the Semantics of Pull Verbs of Hand Action in Mandarin Chinese. In From Minimal Contrast to Meaning Construct [Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics, 9],  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Nicoladis, Elena & Helena Hong Gao
2022. How bilinguals refer to Mandarin throwing actions in English. International Journal of Bilingualism 26:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Wenhui
2020. News Discourse and Cognitive Studies. In A Cross-Cultural Study of Commercial Media Discourses,  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.