Chapter published in:
Negation and Negative Concord: The view from Creoles
Edited by Viviane Déprez and Fabiola Henri
[Contact Language Library 55] 2018
► pp. 33–68

What is negative in Haitian Creole? Negative Concord Items, sentential, constituent and expletive negation

| CNRS L2C2 | Rutgers University
Negative sentences in Creole languages, provocatively claimed to be the world ‘simplest languages’ (Mc Whorter 2001), commonly present a puzzling multiplicity of redundant negative expressions with a single negative interpretation that appear to systematically violate logical compositionality. An intriguing solution to this puzzle proposes that, contrary to appearances, negation is entirely abstract in Creoles, i.e. solely represented by a phonologically null operator dubbed NEG (Homer 2013; Zeijlstra 2004 and following) and has, de facto, no actual direct morpho-phonological exponent. On this, view, not only expressions like pèsonn `nobody’ or anyen `nothing’ are not negative, but neither is the morpheme pa. Revisiting Haitian Creole negative dependencies on the basis of novel data drawn from a corpus of Haitian writings and internet data, this paper critically reviews this approach, showing that it makes a number of incorrect predictions, both with respect to the distribution of Negative Concord items (NCIs) as well as with the morpheme pa, especially on its so called ‘expletive negation’ use, which is investigated here for the first time. The paper argues for a less radical solution that brings Haitian negative dependencies in line with other classic NPI dependencies, claiming that Haitian NCIs are in fact strong NPIs that can be licensed by sentential negation under reconstruction. The puzzle, hence, receives a different solution, keeping with the idea that NCI are non-negative expressions, but also with the more concrete view that pa is the core negation morpheme in Haitian.
Keywords: Negative Concord Item, Expletive Negation, Constituent Negation, Negative Polarity Items
Published online: 12 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.55.03dep
References

References

Alrenga, P. & Kennedy, C.
2013 No more shall we part. Natural Language Semantics 22(1): 1–53 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T. & Zeijlstra, H.
2012 Negative concord in Afrikaans: Filling a typological gap. Journal of Semantics 29(3): 345–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1981 Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
2010 Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G.
2006 Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry 37(4): 535–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998 Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
DeGraff, M.
1993 A riddle on negation in Haitian. Probus 5: 63–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Déprez, V.
1997 Two types of negative concord. Probus 9(2): 103–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Semantic effects of agreement: The case of French past participle agreement. Probus 10(1): 1–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 The roots of negative concord in French and French based creoles. In Language Creation and Language Change: Creole, Diachrony and Development, M. DeGraff (ed) 375–428. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 Parallel (A)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(2): 253–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 On the structuring role of grammaticalized morpho-syntactic features. In NELS 37. Proceedings of the thirty-seventh meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, E. Elfner & M. Walkow (eds) 31–45. Charleston NC: Booksurge.Google Scholar
2011 From N to negative D: Charting the time course of the historical rise of French NCIs. In The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure Variation and Change, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 171] P. Sleeman & H. Perridon (eds), 257–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Atoms of negation: An outside-in micro-parametric approach to negative concord. In The Evolution of Negation: Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, P. Larrivée & R. Ingham (eds), 221–272. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014 NC vs. DN: A macroparametric variation? What can an experimental investigation tell us? Paper presented at the Linguistic Symposium of Romance Languages 44, London, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
2017 What is strict negative concord: Lessons from French based creoles. In Negation and Contact: With a Special Focus on Singlish, [Studies in Language Companion Series 183] D. Ziegler & B. Zhiming (eds), 81–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Déprez , V. & Yeaton, J.
Forthcoming. French negative concord and discord. An experimental investigation.
Déprez, V. & Martineau, F.
2004 Micro-parametric variation and negative concord. In Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 258], J. Auger, J. Clancy Clements & B. Vance (eds), 139–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Déprez, V. & Vinet, M-T.
1997 Predicative constructions and functional categories in Haitian Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 12 (2): 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M. T.
2000 Expletive negation, negative concord and feature checking. Catalan Working Paper in Linguistics (December 1996): 47–69.)Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A.
1998 Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, J.
2012 On the natural history of negative polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 38: 1–2.Google Scholar
Homer, V.
2013 On the nonexistence of negative quantifiers: The case of Haitian Creole. Paper presented at the Paris 8 Seminar on Creole Languages, Saint-Denis, France, 7 October. https://​sites​.google​.com​/site​/vincenthomer​/publicationsGoogle Scholar
Homer, V. & Thommen, T.
2013 Remarks on a language with no overt negation. Paper Presented at the 14th Szklarska Poreba Workshop, Szklarska Poreba, Poland, 1–4 March. https://​sites​.google​.com​/site​/vincenthomer​/publicationsGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, W.
1992 Expressing negation. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) II. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, U.
1998 Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics 6: 57–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laka, I.
1990 Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Mc Whorter, John
2001 The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5: 125–166.Google Scholar
Merchant, J.
2001 The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pompilus, P.
1976 Contribution à l’étude compare du creole et du français à partir du creole haitien: Morphologie et syntaxe. Port au Prince Haiti: Editions Caraibes Preminger, O. 2013 Reversing agreement is untenable: A reply to Zeijlstra, February 2013. lingbuzz/001442.Google Scholar
Puskás, G.
2012 Licensing double negation in NC and non-NC languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 611–649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, A.
2004 The genesis of negative concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling. Linguistic Inquiry 35(4): 559–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weir, A.
2014 Fragment answers and the question under discussion. In NELS 44. Proceedings of the Forty-fourth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Jyoti Iyer & Leland Kusmer (eds) 255–266. Seattle WA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Yoon, S.
2011 “Not” in the Mood: The Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics of Evaluative Negation. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
2013 Parametric variation in subordinate evaluative negation: Korean/Japanese versus others. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22: 133–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, R.
1991 Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1997 Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, H.
2004 Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2008 Negative concord is syntactic agreement. Ms, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2012 There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29: 491–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar