Chapter published in:
Negation and Negative Concord: The view from Creoles
Edited by Viviane Déprez and Fabiola Henri
[Contact Language Library 55] 2018
► pp. 103–124

Negation in Pichi (Equatorial Guinea)

The case for areal convergence

| The University of Hong Kong
This chapter provides a detailed overview of negation in Pichi, the English-lexifier Creole spoken by the people of the island of Bioko (Equatorial Guinea). Pichi negation patterns align closely with areal negation patterns found across a broad swath of West Africa. Like the vast majority of genealogically diverse languages of the region, Pichi employs asymmetric negation strategies. These involve the use of subjunctive mood for the negation of imperatives, the use of suppletive portmanteau forms that combine negative polarity and aspect, and the use of an identity-equation copula that incorporates negative polarity, temporal-aspectual values, person deixis and pragmatic functions, and whose distribution is determined by complex syntactic rules. Negative concord is pragmatically determined, hence non-strict with common nouns, where it renders emphatic meanings. Negative concord is grammatically determined and strict with negative indefinite pronouns and with negative phrases fulfilling the functions of negative indefinite pronouns. I conclude that Pichi negation patterns are typically areal in character and cannot be seen to reflect a “Creole” linguistic type.
Keywords: West Africa, Creole, linguistic area, negation, negative concord, indefinites, TMA, copula
Published online: 12 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.55.05yak
References

References

Agbedor, P. K.
1995 Negation in Ewe. In Niger-Congo Syntax and Semantics, 6: Proceedings of the 1993 Niger-Congo Workshop, Boston University , V. B. Manfredi & K. H. Reynolds (eds), 121–134. Boston MA: African Studies Center, Boston University.
Ameka, F. K.
2008 Aspect and modality in Ewe: A survey. In Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 100], F. K Ameka & M. E. Kropp Dakubu (eds), 135–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderwald, L.
2002 Negation in Non-standard British English: Gaps, Regularizations, and Asymmetries. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M. & Plag, I.
2011 Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, K.
2009 Double negation-marking: A case of contact-induced grammaticalization in West Africa? In Cyffer, Ebermann & Ziegelmeyer (eds), 205–222.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1984 The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and brain sciences 7(2): 173–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christaller, Rev. J. G.
1875 A Grammar of the Asante and Fante Language called Tshi (Chwee, Twi). Gold Coast: Basel German Evangelical Mission.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
1997 Une tentative d’explication de particularités typologiques de la négation en mandingue. Mandenkan 32: 3–22.Google Scholar
Coomber, Ajayi
1992 The new Krio orthography and some unresolved problems. In Eldred D Jones, Karl I Sandred & Neville Shrimpton (eds.), Reading and writing Krio, 15–20. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Cyffer, Norbert
1974 Syntax des Kanuri: Dialekt von Yerwa (Maiduguri) [Hamburger Philologische Studien 35]. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
2009 Negation patterns in Kanuri. In Cyffer, Ebermann & Ziegelmeyer (eds), 71–91.Google Scholar
Cyffer, N., Ebermann, E. & Ziegelmeyer, G.
2009 Negation Patterns in West African Languages and Beyond [Typological Studies in Language 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, R.
1988 Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-Clefts. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diallo, A.
2000 Grammaire descriptive du pular du Fuuta Jaloo. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Duthie, A. S.
1996 Introducing Ewe Linguistic Patterns: A Textbook of Phonology, Grammar, and Semantics. Accra: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar
Fabunmi, F. A.
2013 Negation in sixteen Yorùbá dialects. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 3(1): 1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, N.
2004 Nigerian Pidgin English: Morphology and syntax. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol 2: Morphology and Syntax , B. Kortmann, E. W. Schneider, K. Burridge, T. Mesthrie & C. Upton (eds), 828–853. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Z., Krech, H. & Mirzayan, A.
2002 Motivation for copulas in equational clauses. Linguistic Typology 6(2): 155–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, T.
2008 The Macro-Sudan belt: Towards identifying a linguistic area in northern sub-Saharan Africa. In A Linguistic Geography of Africa, B. Heine & D. Nurse (eds), 151–185. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hancock, I. F.
1971 A Study of the Sources and Development of the Lexicon of Sierra Leone Krio. PhD dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W.
1991 Kriol: The creation of a new language. In Language in Australia, S. Romaine (ed). Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013 Indefinite pronouns. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/46 (20 December 2014).Google Scholar
Huber, M.
2000 Restructuring in vitro? Evidence from early Krio. In Degrees of restructuring in creole languages [Creole Language Library 22], I. Neumann-Holzschuh & E. W Schneider (eds), 275–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jungraithmayr, H.
1988 Zur Negation in afrikanischen Sprachen. In Studia Indogermanica et Slavica, Festgabe für Werner Thomas zum 65. Geburtstag. P. Kosta (ed) 485–496. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Kastenholz, R.
2002 Samogo language islands, and Mande-Senufo (Gur) interference phenomena. In Lexical and Structural Diffusion. Interplay of Internal and External Factors of Language Development in the West African Sahel, N. Robert & P. Zima (eds), 91–109. Nice: Université Nice, Sophia Antipolis.Google Scholar
Lang, J.
2011 A Wolof trace in the verbal system of the Portuguese Creole of Santiago Island (Cape Verde). In Creoles, Their Substrates, and Language Typology [Typological Studies in Language 95], C. Lefebvre (ed) 61–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, M.
1984 Commerce, Christianity and the origins of the “Creoles” of Fernando Po. The Journal of African History 25(3): 257–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín del Molino, A.
1993 La ciudad de Clarence. Malabo: Ediciones Centro Cultural Hispano-Guineano.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J.
1992 Ni and the copula system in Swahili: A diachronic approach. Diachronica 9(1): 15–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 The world’s simplest grammars are Creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5(3–4): 125–156.Google Scholar
Mettouchi, A.
2009 The system of negation in Berber. In Cyffer, Ebermann & Ziegelmeyer (eds), 287–306.Google Scholar
Miestamo, M.
2005 Standard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Migge, B.
2003 Creole Formation as Language Contact: The Case of the Surinamese Creoles [Creole Language Library 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S.
1990 Transfer and the substrate hypothesis in creolistics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12(1): 1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P.
1980 Structural expansion and the process of creolisation. In Theoretical Orientations in Creole Studies, A. Valdman & A. R. Highfield (eds), 19–56. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Munro, J.
2011 Roper River Aboriginal language features in Australian Kriol: Considering semantic categories. In Creoles, Their Substrates, and Language Typology [Typological Studies in Language 95], C. Lefebvre (ed) 461–488. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. & Smith, N.
(eds) 2015 Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 275]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ndimele, O.
2009 Negation marking in Igbo. In Cyffer, Ebermann & Ziegelmeyer (eds), 121–137.Google Scholar
Robert, S.
1990 Aperçu et réflexions sur la négation en wolof. Linguistique Africaine 4: 167–180.Google Scholar
Siegel, J.
1997 Mixing, leveling, and pidgin/creole development. In The Structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles [Creole Language Library 19], A. K Spears & D. Winford (eds), 111–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Substrate reinforcement and dialectal differences in Melanesian Pidgin. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(3): 347–373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 The Emergence of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Smith, N.
2002 The history of the Surinamese creoles II: Origin and differentiation. In Atlas of the languages of Suriname, E. B Carlin & J. Arends (eds), 131–151. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar
2015 Ingredient X: The shared African lexical element in the English-lexifier Atlantic Creoles, and the theory of rapid creolization. In Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 275], Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds), 67–106. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T.
1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Alsenoy, L.
2014 A New Typology of Indefinite Pronouns, with a Focus on Negative Indefinites. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Vydrine, V. F.
2009 Negation in South Mande. In Cyffer, Ebermann & Ziegelmeyer (eds), 223–260.Google Scholar
Westermann, D.
1954  Wörterbuch der Ewe-Sprache, redigierte Ausgabe [Veröff. Des Inst. Für Orientforschung Der Deutschen Akademie Der Wissenschaften Zu Berlin 8]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Whinnom, K.
1971 Linguistic hybridization and the “special case” of pidgin and creoles. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, D. Hymes (ed) 91–115. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Winkelmann, K. & Miehe, G.
2009 Negation in Gur: Genetic, areal and unique features. In Cyffer, Ebermann & Ziegelmeyer (eds), 167–204.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. E.
2007 Reduplication, aspect, and predication focus in Central Chadic: What Lamang and Hdi tell about Malgwa verb morphology. In Topics in Chadic Linguistics, IV: Comparative and Descriptive Studies: Papers from the 3rd Biennial International Colloquium on the chadic Languages, Villejuif, November 24–25, 2005 , H. Tourneux (ed) 129–155. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.
Wyse, A.
1989 The Krio of Sierra Leone: An Interpretive History. London: Hurst, The International African Institute.Google Scholar
Yakpo, K.
2009 A grammar of Pichi. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/2066​/79407 (2 March 2018).
2010 Gramática del Pichi [Laboratorio de Recursos Orales 13]. Barcelona: Ceiba Ediciones.Google Scholar
2012a Reiteration in Pichi: Forms, functions and areal-typological perspectives. In The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-creole Languages [Creole Language Library 43], E. A Aboh & A. Zribi-Hertz (eds), 251–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b Betwixt and between: Causatives in the English-lexicon creoles of West Africa and the Caribbean. In Analytical Causatives from “make” to “laskma”, J. Leino & R. von Waldenfels (eds), 9–39. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2013 Pichi. In The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures: English-based and Dutch-based Languages, Vol. 1, S. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds), 194–205. Oxford: OUP. http://​apics​-online​.info​/contributions​/19 (2 March 2018).Google Scholar
2017 Towards a model of language contact and change in the English-lexifier creoles of Africa and the Caribbean. English World-Wide 38(1): 51–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegelmeyer, G.
2009 Negation of non-indicative mood in Hausa, Fulfulde and Kanuri. In Cyffer, Ebermann & Ziegelmeyer (eds), 7–20.Google Scholar
Zima, P.
2009 Songhay verbal negation in its dialectal and areal context. In Cyffer, Ebermann & Ziegelmeyer (eds), 93–105.Google Scholar