Cover not available
Part of
Negation and Negative Concord: The view from Creoles
Edited by Viviane Déprez and Fabiola Henri
[Contact Language Library 55] 2018
► pp. 125–152

Licensing negation and negative concord in Atlantic Creoles

The case of Vincentian

This chapter examines the distribution of a selection of negative dependent indefinites in Atlantic Creoles in general and Vincentian in particular and their syntactic behavior in the presence of sentential negation. It is posited here that the syntactic behavior of indefinites can be partially accounted for under the negative-first principle (Jespersen 1917: 5; Horn 1989: 73). The negative concord phenomenon is also governed by the same principle. With specific reference to Vincentian, it is shown, however, that the negative-first principle needs to be expanded to embrace an analysis supporting two underlying principles. Firstly, there should be one negative concord item (NCI) per clause and secondly, an NCI like nobadi ‘nobody’ can only have scope over the clause if it is in a prominent syntactic position within the verb phrase, i.e. immediately following the verb.
Keywords: Vincentian Creole, NCIs, negative-first principle, syntactic prominence, negative concord
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sentential negation
    • 2.1Sentential negation in English
    • 2.2Sentential negation in the English-based Creoles
  • 3.Negative concord
    • 3.1Negative concord in the West African varieties
    • 3.2Negative concord in the South American varieties
    • 3.3Negative concord in the Caribbean varieties
    • 3.4Summary of findings for the Atlantic Creoles
  • 4.Types of negative concord
    • 4.1Evidence from Vincentian creole
    • 4.2Complementary observations
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Author query
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.55.06pre
References (54)
References
Bailey, B. Loftman. 1966. Jamaican Creole Syntax: A Transformational Approach. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1968. Jamaican Creole Language (for English Speaking Students). Washington DC: US Peace Corps.Google Scholar
Baker, C. L. 1991. The syntax of English not: The limits of core grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 387–429.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, M. 1993. A riddle on negation in Haitian. Probus 5: 63–93.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diggelen, M. van. 1978. Negro Dutch, in Amsterdam Creole Studies 2(20), P. Muysken (ed), 69-100. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, Institut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap.
den Besten, H. 1986. Double negation and the genesis of Afrikaans, In Substrata Versus Universals in Creole Genesis. Papers from the Amsterdam Creole Workshop, April 1985 [Creole Language Library 1], P. Muysken & N. Smith (eds), 185–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déprez, V. 1995. The roots of negative concord in French and French based creoles, In Language Creation and Language Change: Creole, Diachrony and Development, M. DeGraff (ed) 375–428. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. 2013. Order of negative morpheme and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (15 April 2018).Google Scholar
Espinal, M. T. 2000. On the semantic status of NCIs in Catalan and Spanish. Lingua 110: 557–580.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, N. 1996. Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fyle, C. & Jones, E. 1980. A Krio-English Dictionary. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A. 2000. Negative … concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(3): 457–523.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. N-words and negative concord, In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. III, Chapter 45, M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (eds), 327–391. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greene, L. 1999. A Grammar of Belizean Creole; Compilations from Two Existing United States Dialects [Berkeley Models of Grammar 7]. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Guéron, J. 1999. English Grammar: A Generative Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Zanuttini, R. 1991. Negative heads and the neg criterion. The Linguistic Review 8: 233–252.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancock, I. F. 1987. A preliminary classification of the Anglophone Atlantic Creoles with syntactic data from thirty-three representative dialects. In Pidgin and Creole Languages: Essays in Memory of John Reinecke, G. Gilbert (ed) 264–333. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013. Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (15 April 2018).Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. & the APiCS Consortium. 2013. Position of standard negation, Chapter 101. In S. M. Michaelis et al.. (eds), 402–405.Google Scholar
Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Holm, J. 1988. Pidgins and Creoles. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2000. Any and (−)ever: Free choice and free relative. In Proceedings of The Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, IATL 7, A. Z. Wyner (ed) 71–111.Google Scholar
Howe, D. & Walker, J. 2000. Negation and the creole-origins hypothesis: Evidence from Early African American English, In The English History of African American English, S. Poplack (ed) 109–140. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huber, M. 1999. Ghanaian Pidgin English in its West African context: A Sociohistorical and Structural Analysis [Varieties of Englishes around the World 24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttar, G. & Huttar, M. 1994. Ndyuka. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
James, W. 2002. Some other grammatical differences with Trinidadian. In The Languages of Tobago: Genesis, Structure and Perspectives, W. James & V. Youssef (eds), 151–169. St. Augustine, Trinidad: UWI Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Reprinted in 1962, Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen, 3–151. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. 1964. Negation in English. In The Structure of Language, S. Fodor & J. Katz (eds), 246–323. New York NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language 48: 773–818.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, W. A. 1979. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Reproduced by IULC, 1980.Google Scholar
1992. Expressing negation, In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), C. Barker & D. Dowty (eds), 237–259. Columbus OH: The Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Laka, I. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Martin, T. 2008. Non-negative negations in Catalan. A problem for compositionality? <[URL]> (3 June 2014).
Michaelis, S. M., Maurer, P., Haspelmath, M. & Huber, M. (eds). 2013. The Atlas and Survey of Pidgin and Creole languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. 2008. Gullah: Morphology and syntax, In Varieties of English, 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, E. Schneider (ed) 551–571. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mühleisen, S. S 2013. Trinidad English Creole. In S.M. Michaelis et al.. (eds), Vol. 1, Chapter 6, 61–69.Google Scholar
Pollock, J-Y. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Radford, A. 1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rickford, J. 1987. Dimensions of a Creole Continuum: History, Texts, and Linguistic Analysis of Guyanese Creole. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Seuren, P. A. 1991. Grammatika als algorithme : rekenen met taal. Amsterdam; New York: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akadmie van Wetenschappen. Collection: Mededelingen van de Afdeling Letterkunde, nieuwe reeks, d. 54, no. 2.
van der Wouden, T. & Zwarts, F. 1992. Negative concord. In Language and Cognition 2. Yearbook 1992 of the Research Group for Linguistic Theory and Knowledge Representation of the University of Groningen, D. Gilbers & S. Looyenga (eds), 317–331. Groningen: TENK.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. 2005. Why languages prefer prohibitives. Wai guo yu – Journal of Foreign Languages 161: 2–25.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. & Van Alsenoy, L. 2016. On the typology of negative concord. Studies in Language 40(3): 473–512.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, A. 2004. The genesis of negative concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 559-612.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilner, J. (ed) 2003. Workubuki ini Sranan Tongo. Sranan Tongo – English Dictionary, 4th edn.Paramaribo, Suriname: SIL International, <[URL]> (12 March 2006).Google Scholar
Winford, D. 2000. Irrealis in Sranan: Mood and modality in a radical creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 15(1): 63–125.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, D. & Migge, B. 2008. Surinamese Creoles: Morphology and syntax. In Varieties of English, Vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, E. W. Schneider (ed) 693–731. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yakpo, K. 2009. A Grammar of Pichi. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, R. 1991. Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Prescod, Paula
2018. La négation phrastique et les indéfinis négatifs en créole vincentien. Études créoles :35 | 1-2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.