Separating layers of information
The anatomy of contact zones
Linguistic areas, or Sprachbünde, can be described very broadly as geographical areas where a group of languages have become similar to each other because of prolonged contact between the speakers of the different languages. Numerous linguistic areas have been proposed over the years and all over the globe, and the study of linguistic areas has become an integral part of the more general study of contact linguistics and contact-induced change. Nevertheless, linguistic areas are notoriously hard to define in a consistent and meaningful way, and some scholars have even suggested abandoning the notion altogether. In this paper, I argue against abandoning the notion of linguistic area as such, but I am in favor of changing the approach or the procedure we follow in detecting or confirming linguistic areas. I would like to introduce a conceptual change, moving away from the idea of a linguistic area as a well-circumscribed geographical area towards an idea of contact zones as windows on the past. The procedure I propose is based on what may be called the anatomy of linguistic areas, consisting of a geographical, cultural-historical, communicative, and (structural-)linguistic layer. An approach to a linguistic area can start in any of these layers, but crucially refers to the others as well. One research set-up that is made possible by this approach is to set up a hypothesis-test procedure whereby one or more layers predict the others.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Problems with linguistic areas
- 2.1Geography-related problems
- 2.2Language-related problems
- 2.3Problems related to features
- 2.4Making the case for contact
- 3.The layers of a potential contact zone
- 4.Information layers
- 4.1Geography
- 4.2Socio-cultural history
- 4.3Communicative practices
- 4.4Structural features
- 4.5Non-isomorphism, bottom-up, and top-down
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2002 Language Contact in Amazonia. Oxford: OUP.
Arias, L., Barbieri, C., Barreto, G., Pakendorf, B. & Stoneking, M.
2018 High-resolution mitochondrial DNA analysis sheds light on human diversity, cultural interactions, and population mobility in northwestern Amazonia.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 165(2): 238–255.
Bickel, B.
2011 Multivariate typology and field linguistics: A case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan). In
Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3,
P. K. Austin,
O. Bond,
D. Nathan, &
L. Marten (eds), 3–13. London: SOAS.
Bickel, B.
2020 Large and ancient linguistic areas. In
Language Dispersal, Diversification, and Contact: A Global Perspective,
E. I. Crevels,
J.-M. Hombert &
P. C. Muysken (eds), Oxford: OUP.
Bickel, B. & Nichols, J.
2006 Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the theory of linguistic areas. In
Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Special Session on the Languages and Linguistics of Oceania,
Z. Antić,
C. B. Chang,
C. S. Sandy &
M. Toosarvandani (eds), 3–15. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Bowern, C.
2013 Relatedness as a factor in language ontact.
Journal of Language Contact. 6(2): 411–432.
Campbell, L.
2006 Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In
Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective,
Y. Matras,
A. McMahon &
N. Vincent (eds), 1–31. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan..
Collard, I. F. & Foley, R. A.
2002 Latitudinal patterns and environmental determinants of recent human cultural diversity: Do humans follow biogeographical rules? Evolutionary Ecology Research 4: 371–383.
Dahl, Ö.
2001 Principles of areal typology. In
Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook,
M. Haspelmath,
E. König,
W. Oesterreicher &
W. Raible (eds), 1456–1470. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Diller, A.
2008 Mountains, rivers or seas? Ecology and language history in Southeast Asia. In
SEALSXIV: Papers from the 14th meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (2004), Vol. 1,
W. Khanittanan &
P. Sidwell (eds), 93–106. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Dixon, R. M. W.
1997 The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: CUP.
Dixon, R. M. W.
2001 The Australian linguistic area. In
Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics,
A. Y. Aikhenvald &
R. M. W. Dixon (eds), 64–104. Oxford: OUP.
Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y.
(eds) 1999 The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: CUP.
Emeneau, M. B.
1980 Language and Linguistic Area: Essays by Murray B. Emeneau, Selected and Introduced by Anwar S. Dil [
Language Science and National Development 14]. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Enfield, N. J.
2005 Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia.
Annual Review of Anthropology 34:181–206.
Eriksen, L.
2011 Nature and Culture in Prehistoric Amazonia: Using G.I.S. to Reconstruct Ancient Ethnogenetic Processes from Archaeology, Linguistics, Geography, and Ethnohistory. PhD dissertation, Lund University.
Greenhill, S.
2014 Demographic correlates of language diversity. In
The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics,
C. Bowern &
B. Evans (eds), 557–578. London: Routledge.
Güldemann, T. & Hammarström, H.
2020 Geographical axis effects in large-scale linguistic distributions. In
Language Dispersal, Diversification, and Contact: A Global Perspective,
E. I. Crevels,
J.-M. Hombert &
P. C. Muysken (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Gumperz, J. J. & R. Wilson
1971 Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo Aryan/Dravidian border in India. In
Pidginization and Creolization of Languages,
D. Hymes (ed.), 151–167. Cambridge: CUP.
Haspelmath, M.
2001 The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In
Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook,
M. Haspelmath,
E. König,
W. Oesterreicher &
W. Raible (eds), 1492–1510. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Heine, B. & Leyew, Z.
2008 Is Africa a linguistic area? In
A Linguistic Geography of Africa,
B. Heine &
D. Nurse (eds), 15–35. Cambridge: CUP.
Joseph, B.
2010 Language contact in the Balkans. In
The Handbook of Language Contact,
R. Hickey (ed.), 618–633. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lindstedt, J.
2000 Linguistic Balkanization: Contact-induced change by mutual reinforcement. In
Languages in Contact,
D. Gilbers,
J. Nerbonne &
J. Schaeken (eds), 231–261. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Mace, R. & Pagel, M.
1995 A latitudinal gradient in the density of human languages in North America.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 261(1360): 117–121.
Masica, C.
2001 The definition and significance of linguistic areas: Methods, pitfalls, and possibilities (with special reference to the validity of South Asia as a linguistic area). In
The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2001. Tokyo Symposium on South Asian Languages: Contact, Convergence and Typology,
R. Singh,
P. Bhaskararao &
K. V. Subbarao (eds), 205–267. New Delhi: Sage.
Matras, Y.
2007 The borrowability of structural categories. In
Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-linguistic Perspective,
Y. Matras &
J. Sakel (eds), 31–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mithun, M.
1999 The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: CUP.
Muysken, P. C.
2010 Scenarios for language contact. In
The Handbook of Language Contact,
R. Hickey (ed.), 265–281. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Muysken, P. C.
2012 Modelling the Quechua-Aymara relationship: Sociolinguistic scenarios and possible archaeological evidence. In
Archaeology and Language in the Andes,
P. Heggarty &
D. G. Beresford-Jones (eds), 83–107, Oxford: OUP.
Muysken, P. C., Hammarström, H., Birchall, J. T. R., van Gijn, R., Krasnoukhova, O. V. & Müller, N. J.
2015 Linguistic areas, bottom-up or top-down? The case of the Guaporé-Mamoré. In
Language Contact and Documentation,
B. Comrie &
L. Golluscio (eds), 205–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nettle, D.
1999 Linguistic Diversity. Oxford: OUP.
Nettle, D. & Romaine, S.
2000 Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford: OUP.
Nichols, J.
1992 Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pakendorf, B.
2014 Historical linguistics and molecular anthropology. In
The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics,
C. Bowern &
B. Evans (eds), 627–641. London: Routledge.
Parkvall, M.
2008 Which parts of language are the most stable? Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61: 234–250.
Sandfeld, K.
1930 Linguistique balkanique: Problemes et resultats. Paris: E. Champion.
Stolz, T.
2002 No Sprachbund beyond this line. On the age-old discussion of how to define a linguistic area. In
Mediterranean Languages. Papers from the MEDTYP Workshop, Tirrenia, June 2000,
P. Ramat &
T. Stolz (eds.), 259–281. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.
Stolz, T.
2006 All or nothing. In
Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective,
Y. Matras,
A. McMahon &
N. Vincent (eds), 1–31. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Thomason, S. G.
2001 Language Contact. An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T.
1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Trubetskoj, N. S.
1928 Proposition 16. In
Actes de 1er Congrès international de linguistes, 17–18. Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff’s Uitgeversmaatschappij.
Weinreich, U.
1953 Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York NY: Linguistic Circle of New York.
Wichmann, S. & Holman, E. W.
2009 Assessing Temporal Stability for Linguistic Typological Features. Munich: Lincom.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Ranacher, Peter, Nico Neureiter, Rik van Gijn, Barbara Sonnenhauser, Anastasia Escher, Robert Weibel, Pieter Muysken & Balthasar Bickel
2021.
Contact-tracing in cultural evolution: a Bayesian mixture model to detect geographic areas of language contact.
Journal of The Royal Society Interface 18:181
► pp. 20201031 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.