Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Contact Linguistics: In honour of Pieter Muysken
Edited by Norval Smith, Tonjes Veenstra and Enoch O. Aboh
[Contact Language Library 57] 2020
► pp. 179–216

Areal diffusion of applicatives in the Amazon

ORCID logo | LUCL, Universiteit Leiden
ORCID logo | Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Many genetically unrelated languages of (North)western Amazonia share certain specific characteristics, which may be due to areal diffusion. Especially the eclectic classifier systems encountered across this region have been in focus lately, as well as valency changing strategies, in particular applicatives involving forms resembling -tA, which show conspicuous similarities across (North)western and Southern Amazonia. Ongoing research in Southern Amazonia has led to the identification of a number of very similar traits and even some striking formal similarities. Even though the (North)western and Southern Amazon may not constitute a single linguistic area, certain grammatical traits such as classifier systems and valency-changing strategies can be considered as areal features of the Amazon region as a whole, and beyond. In this article we will discuss correspondences between the expressions of valency change in the (North)western and Southern Amazon regions.
Keywords: applicatives, valency-changing morphemes, areal diffusion, Amazonia
Article outline
  • 1.Background
  • 2.Applicatives in the Amazon
    • 2.1(North)western Amazon
    • 2.2Southern Amazon
    • 2.3Bolivian Andean foothills
    • 2.4Andean
  • 3.Discussion
  • 4.By way of conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 29 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.57.06cre
References (129)
References
Adelaar, W. F. H. with Muysken, P. C. 2004. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adelaar, W. F. H. & van de Kerke, S. 2009. Puquina. In Lenguas de Bolivia I: Ámbito andino, M. Crevels & P. C. Muysken (eds), 125–146. La Paz: Plural editores.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2001. Dicionário Tariana-Português e Português-Tariana. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (Antropologia) 17(1): 3–433.Google Scholar
2002. Language Contact in Amazonia. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Alves, F. de Castro. 2014. Aumento de valência em Canela. In Incremento de valencia en las lenguas amazónicas, F. Queixalós, S. Telles & A. C. Bruno (eds), 191–209. Bogota: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Alves, P. M. 2004. O Léxico do Tuparí: Proposta de um dicionário bilíngüe. PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita”.Google Scholar
Angenot de Lima, G. 2002. Description phonologique, grammaticale et lexicale du Moré, Langue Amazonienne de Bolivie et du Brésil, 2 vols. Porto Velho: Editora da Universidade Federal de Rondônia.Google Scholar
Bacelar, L. N. 2004. Gramática da língua Kanoê. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Baker, M. C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Birchall, J. T. R. 2014a. Argument Marking Patterns in South American Languages [LOT Dissertation Series 352]. Utrecht: LOT Publications. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
2014b. Verbal argument marking patterns in South American languages. In The Native Languages of South America: Origins, Development, Typology, L. M. O’Connor & P. C. Muysken (eds), 223–249. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Boswood, J. 1974. Algumas funções de participante nas orações Rikbaktsa. Série Lingüística 3: 7–33. SIL Brazil.Google Scholar
Brandão, A. P. 2014. Causatives in Paresi-Haliti (Arawak). In Incremento de valencia en las lenguas amazónicas, F. Queixalós, S. Telles & A. C. Bruno (eds), 19–31. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacique Coronado, L. 2016. Guia teórica asheninka, G. Zerdin (ed.). Atalaya: Universidad Católica Sedes Sapientiae.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. 1998. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
2006. Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, Y. Matras, A. McMahon & N. Vincent (eds), 1–31. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. & Grondona, V. 2012. Languages of the Chaco and Southern Cone. In The Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide [The World of Linguistics 2], L. Campbell & V. Grondona (eds), 625–667. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, R. 2009. Chipaya. In Lenguas de Bolivia, I: Ámbito andino, M. Crevels & P. C. Muysken (eds), 29–77. La Paz: Plural editores.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, R. & Carvajal Carvajal, J. 2009. Aimara. In Lenguas de Bolivia I: Ámbito andino, M. Crevels & P. C. Muysken (eds), 169–213. La Paz: Plural editores.Google Scholar
Coler, M. 2014. A Grammar of Muylaq’ Aymara: Aymara as spoken in Southern Peru [Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 8]. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Comrie, B., Golluscio, L. A., González, H. & Vidal, A. 2010. El Chaco como área lingüística. In Estudios de lenguas amerindias, 2: Contribuciones al estudio de las lenguas originarias de América, Z. Estrada Fernández & R. Arzápalo Marín (eds), 85–130. Hermosillo, Sonora: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Crevels, M. 2006. Verbal number in Itonama. In What’s in a Verb? Studies in the Verbal Morphology of the Languages of the Americas [LOT Occasional Series 5], G. J. Rowicka & E. B. Carlin (eds), 159–170. Utrecht: LOT Publications. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
2011. Who did what to whom in Magdalena (Itonama). International Journal of American Linguistics 77(4): 577–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Itonama. In Lenguas de Bolivia, II: Amazonía, M. Crevels & P. C. Muysken (eds), 233–294. La Paz: Plural editores.Google Scholar
Crevels, M. & van der Voort, H. 2008. The Guaporé-Mamoré region as a linguistic area. In From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 90], P. C. Muysken (ed.), 151–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, S. 2007. A Grammar of Baure [Indigenous Languages of Latin America 6]. Leiden: CNWS Publications.Google Scholar
2012. Baure. In Lenguas de Bolivia, II: Amazonía, M. Crevels & P. C. Muysken (eds), 295–339. La Paz: Plural editores.Google Scholar
2014. Multiple valency derivation in Baure (Arawakan). In Incremento de valencia en las lenguas amazónicas, F. Queixalós, S. Telles & A. C. Bruno (eds), 285–312. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
de Araujo, G. Antunes 2004. A Grammar of Sabanê: A Nambikwaran Language [LOT Dissertation Series 94]. Utrecht: LOT Publications. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Eberhard, D. M. 2009. Mamaindê Grammar: A Northern Nambikwara Language and its Cultural Context [LOT Dissertation Series 236]. Utrecht: LOT Publications. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Emkow, C. 2006. A Grammar of Araona, an Amazonian Language of Northwestern Bolivia. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
2007. The Vaupés melting pot: Tukanoan influence on Hup. In Grammars in Contact: A Cross-linguistic Typology, A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds), 267–289. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009. Language classification, language contact, and Amazonian prehistory. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2): 581–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, P. & Stenzel, K. (eds). 2013. Upper Rio Negro: Cultural and Linguistic Interaction in Northwestern Amazonia. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional – Museu do Índio – FUNAI.Google Scholar
Eriksen, L. 2011. Nature and Culture in Prehistoric Amazonia: Using G.I.S. to Reconstruct Ancient Ethnogenetic Processes from Archaeology, Linguistics, Geography, and Ethnohistory. PhD dissertation, Lund University. <[URL]> (26 April 2020)
Fernández Garay, A. V. 2001. Ranquel-Español / Español-Ranquel. Diccionario de una variedad mapuche de La Pampa (Argentina) [Indigenous Languages of Latin America 2]. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Fleck, D. W. 2013. Panoan Languages and Linguistics [Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 99]. New York NY: American Museum of Natural History. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabas, N. Jr. 1999. A Grammar of Karo, Tupí (Brazil). PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. L. 1996. El munichi: Un idioma que se extingue [Serie Lingüística Peruana 42]. Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano – Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
Gomes, D. M. 2006. Estudo morfológico e sintáctico da língua Mundurukú. PhD dissertation, Universidade de Brasília. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Grinevald, C. & Seifart, F. 2004. Noun classes in African and Amazonian languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2): 243–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, A. 2008. A Grammar of Cavineña [Mouton Grammar Library 44]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Third person agreement and passive marking in Tacanan languages: A historical perspective. International Journal of American Linguistics 77(4): 521–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. A tale of two passives in Cavineña. In Ergativity, Valency and Voice [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 48], G. Authier & K. Haude (eds), 111–131. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, J., McLeod, R. A. & Mitchell, V. 2004 [1987]. Pequeno dicionário Xavante Portugués / Portugués Xavante, revised and updated by A. Harrison. Cuiabá: Sociedade Internacional de Lingüística.Google Scholar
Hart, H. 1988. Diccionario chayahuita-castellano [Serie Lingüística Peruana 29]. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano – Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. & Gilligan, G. 1988. Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order. Lingua 74(2–3): 219–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haynie, H., Bowern, C., Epps, P., Hill, J. & McConvell, P. 2014. Wanderwörter in languages of the Americas and Australia. Ampersand (1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohlberger, M. 2013. Multitasking in Shiwiar verbal morphology: Applicatives, objects and beyond. Friday Afternoon Lecture, February 15, 2013, LUCL, Leiden.Google Scholar
Krasnoukhova, O. V. 2012. The Noun Phrase in the Languages of South America [LOT Dissertation Series 301]. Utrecht: LOT Publications. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
2014. The noun phrase: Focus on demonstratives, redrawing the semantic map. In The Native Languages of South America: Origins, Development, Typology, L. M. O’Connor & P. C. Muysken (eds), 250–273. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lathrap, D. W. 1970. The Upper Amazon. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Martins, A., Camargos, L., Costa, L. & Miranda, M. 2009. Causativização em línguas do tronco Macro-Jê: Primeiras aproximações. In Anais do SILEL – Simpósio Nacional e Internacional de Letras e Linguística, Vol. 1. Uberlândia: EDUFU. <[URL]> (26 April).
Matras, Y. 2009. Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Why is the borrowing of inflectional morphology dispreferred? In Borrowed Morphology, F. Gardani, P. Arkadiev & N. Amiridze (eds), 47–80. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Meader, R. E. 1967. Iranxe: Notas gramaticais e lista vocabular [Publicações Série Diversos Lingüística II]. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Meira, S. 1999. A Grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Messineo, C. 2011. Aproximación tipológica a las lenguas indígenas del Gran Chaco. Rasgos compartidos entre toba (familia guaycurú) y maká (familia mataco-mataguayo). Indiana 28: 183–225.Google Scholar
Mihas, E. 2010. Essentials of Ashéninka Perené Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
2015. A Grammar of Alto Perené (Arawak) [Mouton Grammar Library 69]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. C., Hammarström, H., Birchall, J. T. R., Danielsen, S., Eriksen, L., Galucio, A. V., van Gijn, R., van de Kerke, S., Kolipakam, V., Krasnoukhova, O. V., Müller, N. J. & O’Connor, L. M. 2014. The languages of South America: Deep families, areal relationships, and language contact. In The Native Languages of South America: Origins, Development, Typology, L. M. O’Connor & P. C. Muysken (eds), 299–322. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. C., Hammarström, H., Birchall, J. T. R., van Gijn, R., Krasnoukhova, O. V., & Müller, N. J. 2015. Linguistic areas, bottom up or top down? The case of the Guaporé-Mamoré region. In Language Contact and Documentation, B. Comrie & L. Golluscio (eds), 205–237. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nimuendajú, C. 1926. Die Palikur-Indianer und ihre Nachbarn. Göteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.Google Scholar
Nonato, R. 2008. Ainore Boe egore: Um estudo descritivo da lingua Bororo e consequencias para a teoria de caso e concordancia. MA thesis, Unicamp, Campinas. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Oldendorp, C. G. A. 1996 [1767–68]. Criolisches Wörterbuch: Erster zu vermehrender und wo nöthig zu verbessernder Versuch [1767/68], herausgegeben, eingeleitet und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Peter Stein, sowie das anonyme, Johan Christopher Kørbitz Thomsen Kingo (J. C. Kingo) zugeschriebene Vestindisk Glossarium, herausgegeben, eingeleitet und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Hein van der Voort. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overall, S. 2007. A Grammar of Aguaruna. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
2017. A Grammar of Aguaruna (Iiniá Chicham) [Mouton Grammar Library 68]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Padua, A. J. 2007. Contribuição para a fonologia da língua Apiaká (Tupí-Guaraní). MA thesis, Universidade de Brasília. Available at <[URL]>.
Payne, D. 2001. Causatives in Asheninka: The case for a sociative source. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48], M. Shibatani (ed.), 485–505. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, D. L. 1985. -ta in Zaparoan and Peba-Yaguan. International Journal of American Linguistics 51(4): 529–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990. Some widespread grammatical forms in South American languages. In Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languages, D. L. Payne (ed.), 75–87. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Payne, T. E. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peeke, C. 1953. Análisis tentativo de la morfología andoa [Información de Campo no. 32-c]. Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano. (Microfiche).Google Scholar
1959. Shimigae, idioma que se extingue. In Estudios acerca de las lenguas huarani (auca), shimigae, y zapara, 18–28. Quito: Publicaciones Científicos del Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, M. G. J. 2005. Shiwilu Wichi’‒ Sueño Jeberino: Un estudio de la lengua Shiwilu y las voces nativas representado en las tradiciones orales de Jeberos, Alto Amazonas, Perú. MA thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. A. 2007. Applicative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Plaza Martínez, P. 2009. Quechua. In Lenguas de Bolivia, Tomo 1: Ámbito andino, M. Crevels & P. C. Muysken (eds), 215–284. La Paz: Plural editores.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2013. Applicative constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
2017. Antipassive. In The Oxford handbook of ergativity, C. Jessica, D. Massam & L. D. Travis (eds), 308–331. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Queixalós, F. 2014. Incremental valence changes in an ergative vs. an accusative language: A comparison between Katukina-Kanamari and Sikuani. In Incremento de valencia en las lenguas amazónicas, F. Queixalós, S. Telles & A. C. Bruno (eds), 313–327. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Rich, R. G. 1975. Sufijos verbales y apuntes gramaticales sobre el idioma Arabela. In Datos etno-lingüisticos 18 (12 pp.). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
1999. Diccionario Arabela-Castellano [Serie Lingüística Peruana 49]. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Riester, J. n.d. Unpublished manuscript list of Napeka/Kitemoka words, APCOB, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.
Rodrigues, A. D. & Caspar, F. 1958. Zur Sprache der Tuparí-Indianer (Westbrasilien). <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Rose, F. 2008. A typological overview of Emerillon, a Tupi-Guarani language from French Guiana. Linguistic Typology 12(3): 431–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowan, O. 2001 [1978]. Iraiti xawaiyekehalakatyakala: Dicionário Paresí ‒ Português. Cuiabá: Sociedade Internacional de Lingüística.Google Scholar
Sakel, J. J. 2004. A Grammar of Mosetén [Mouton Grammar Library 33]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seifart, F. 2012. Causative marking in Resígaro (Arawakan): A descriptive and comparative perspective. International Journal of American Linguistics 78(3): 369–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seifart, F. & Payne, D. L. 2007. Nominal classification in the North West Amazon: Issues in areal diffusion and typological characterization. International Journal of American Linguistics 73(4): 381–387.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seki, L. 1999. The Upper Xingu as an incipient linguistic area. In The Amazonian Languages, R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 417–430. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. & Pardeshi, P. 2002. The causative continuum. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48], M. Shibatani (ed.), 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, L. de Jesus. 2011. Morphosyntaxe du Rikbaktsa (Amazonie brésilienne). PhD dissertation, Université Denis Diderot, Paris 7. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Singerman, A. R. 2018. The Morphosyntax of Tuparí. A Tupían Language of the Brazilian Amazon. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Smeets, I. 2008. A Grammar of Mapuche. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, J. J. 1990. On the rise of causative affixes: A universal-typological perspective. Lingua 82: 151–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, A. P. 1967. Multilingualism in the Northwest Amazon. American Anthropologist 69(6): 670–684. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Stenzel, K. 2005. Multilingualism in the Northwest Amazon revisited. Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America-II, University of Texas at Austin, 1–28. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Stenzel, K. & Gómez-Imbert, E. 2009. Contato lingüístico e mudança lingüística no noroeste amazônico: O caso do Kotiria (Wanano). Revista da ABRALIN 8: 71–100.Google Scholar
Swift, K. E. 1988. Morfología del Caquinte (arawak preandino) [Serie Lingüística Peruana 25]. Yarinacocha, Peru: Ministerio de Educación – Instituto Linguístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Telles, S. 2002. Fonologia e gramática Latundê/Lakondê. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. 1995. Diccionario amarakaeri-castellano. Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación e Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Tuggy, D. 1988. Nahuatl causative/applicatives in cognitive grammar. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50], B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), 587–618. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, P. 2011. Argument encoding and pragmatic marking of the transitive subject in Shiwilu (Kawapanan). International Journal of American Linguistics 77(1): 91–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, P. & Butler, L. 2009. Argument encoding and valence changing in Kawapanan. Paper presented at the SSILA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 8–10 January, 2009.
Vallejos, R. 2014. Cambio de valencia en Kokama-Kokamilla. In Incremento de valencia en las lenguas amazónicas, F. Queixalós, S. Telles & A. C. Bruno (eds), 261–283. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
van Baarle, P., Sabajo, M. A., Sabajo, A. L., Sabajo, L. L. & van der Stap, G. 1989. Arhwaka Lokonong Djang: Arowakse taalkursus en woordenboek. Haarlem/Amsterdam: Sociaal-culturele vereniging Ikyoshie and Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap.Google Scholar
van de Kerke, S. 2009. Leko. In Lenguas de Bolivia, I: Ámbito andino, M. Crevels & P. C. Muysken (eds), 287–331. La Paz: Plural editores.Google Scholar
van der Voort, H. 2004. A Grammar of Kwaza [Mouton Grammar Library 29]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Kwaza in a comparative perspective. International Journal of American Linguistics 71(4): 365–412.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Fala fictícia fossilizada: O tempo futuro em Aikanã. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (Ciências Humanas) 8(2): 359–377. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
2015. Sistemas de classificação nominal no Sudoeste amazônico. Moara: Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras 43(2): 5–22.Google Scholar
2016. Recursive inflection and grammaticalized fictive interaction in the southwestern Amazon. In The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction [Human Cognitive Processing 55], E. Pascual & S. Sandler (eds), 277–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Development and diffusion of classifier systems in Southwestern Amazonia. The Diachrony of Classification Systems [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 342]. W. B. McGregor & S. Wichmann (eds), 201–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, R. 2006. A Grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud University. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
2014. Subordination strategies in South America: Nominalization. In The Native Languages of South America: Origins, Development, Typology, L. M. O’Connor & P. C. Muysken (eds), 274–296. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2015. Verbal synthesis in the Guaporé-Mamoré linguistic area: A contact feature? Linguistic Discovery 13(2): 96–122. <[URL]> (26 April 2020).
Van Linden, A. Forthcoming. Harakmbut. In Amazonian Languages, Vol. 1: Smaller Language Families and Isolates [HSK 44/1], P. Epps & L. Michael (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Wapishana Language Project. 2000. Scholar’s Dictionary and Grammar of the Wapishana Language ‒ Tominpainao Ati’o Wapichan Paradan Parada-karu Na’iki Paradauzo-karu Kaduzu. San Jose via Lethem, Rupununi: Wapishana Language Project.Google Scholar
Winford, D. 2003. An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wise, M. R. 1990. Valence-changing affixes in Maipuran Arawakan languages. In Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languages, D. L. Payne (ed.), 89–116. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1993. Algunas interrogantes en la clasificación de las lenguas indígenas sudamericanas. Paper presented at the 10th International Congress of the Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de la América Latina (ALFAL), Veracruz, Mexico, April 11–16, 1993.
1999. Small language families and isolates in Peru. In The Amazonian Languages, R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 307–340. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2002. Applicative affixes in Peruvian Amazonian languages. In Current Studies on South American Languages [Indigenous Languages of Latin America 3], M. Crevels, S. van de Kerke, S. Meira & H. van der Voort (eds), 329–344. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, F. 2009. The applicatives of Mapudungun. Paper presented at the SSILA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 8–10 January, 2009.
2013. Some valency-neutral applicatives in the Americas. Paper presented at the Workshop Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, August 14–15, 2013.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Campbell, Lyle
2024. The Indigenous Languages of the Americas, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.