Part of
Advances in Contact Linguistics: In honour of Pieter Muysken
Edited by Norval Smith, Tonjes Veenstra and Enoch O. Aboh
[Contact Language Library 57] 2020
► pp. 261282
Arends, J. T. G.
1994The socio-historical background of creoles. In Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction, Arends, Muysken & Smith (eds), 15–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arends, J., Muysken, P. C. & Smith, N.
(eds) 1994Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction [Creole Language Library 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N.
1973Variation and Linguistic Theory. Arlington VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bakker, P., & Muysken, P. C.
1994Mixed languages and language intertwining. In Arends, Muysken & Smith (eds), 41–52.Google Scholar
Chien, Y.
2015The lexical system of Yilan Creole. In New Advances in Formosan Linguistics, E. Zeitoun, S. F. Teng & J. J. Wu (eds), 513–532. Canberra: Asian Pacific Linguistics. [URL]> (27 April 2020).
2016Yilan Creole case marking. NINJAL Research Papers 10: 1–17.Google Scholar
Chien, Y. & Sanada, S.
2010Yilan Creole in Taiwan. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 25(2): 350–357.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Taiwan no giran kureouru ni okeru hiteiji: -nay to -ng no henyou o megutte (Negation in Taiwan’s Yilan Creole: Focusing on -nay and -ng). Gengo Kenkyu [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan] 140: 73–87.Google Scholar
Coșeriu, E.
1981Lecciones de lingüística general. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
2000Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gorbunova, I. M.
2014The category of phasal polarity in Atayal. ВОПРОСЫ ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИЯ 3.Google Scholar
2017Грамматическая семантика атаяльского глагола в типологической перспективе (The Grammatical Semantics of Atayal Verbs from a Typological Perspective). PhD dissertation, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow.Google Scholar
Kaiser, S., Ichikawa, Y., Kobayashi, N., & Yamamoto, H.
2013Japanese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, F.
2013Mixed languages. In Contact Languages: A Comprehensive Guide, P. Bakker & Y. Matras (eds), 159–228. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S.
2001The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. C.
1981Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In Historicity and Variation in Creole Studies, A. Highfield & A. Valdman (eds), 52–78. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
2000Semantic transparency in Lowland Ecuadorian Quechua morphosyntax. Linguistics 38(5): 973–988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Functional Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Gradual restructuring in Ecuadorian Quechua. In Gradual Creolization: Studies Celebrating Jacques Arends [Creole Language Library 34], R. Selbach, H. Cardoso & M van den Berg (eds), 77–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. C. & Smith, N. S. H.
1994Introduction: The study of pidgin and creole languages. In Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction, Arends, Muysken & Smith (eds), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C.
1993Duelling languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2003What lies beneath: Split (mixed) languages as contact phenomena. In The Mixed Language Debate: Theoretical and Empirical Advances, Y. Matras & P. Bakker (eds), 73–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
O’Connor, L. M. & Muysken, P. C.
2014The Native Languages of South America. Origins, Development, Typology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Qiu, P.
2015A Preliminary Investigation of Yilan Creole in Taiwan: Discussing Predicate Position in Yilan Creole. MA thesis, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Rau, D.-H. V.
1992A Grammar of Atayal. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Sanada, S.
2010Yilan Creole in Taiwan: A Japanese-lexicon creole. Lecture presented at the International Centre for Japanese Studies. Retrieved from: [URL]> (27 April 2020).
Seuren, P. A. M.
1972Autonomous versus semantic syntax. Foundations of Language 8(2): 237–265.Google Scholar
2018Semantic Syntax, 2nd rev. edn. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M. & Wekker, H.
1986Semantic transparency as a factor in Creole genesis. In Substrata Versus Universals in Creole Genesis: Papers from the Amsterdam Creole Workshop, April 1985 [Creole Language Library 1], P. C. Muysken & N. Smith (eds), 57–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M.
2003Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4): 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. S. H.
1994An annotated list of creoles, pidgins, and mixed languages. In Arends, Muysken & Smith (eds), 331–374.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G.
2003Social factors and linguistic processes in the emergence of stable mixed languages. In The Mixed Language Debate: Theoretical and Empirical Advances, Y. Matras & P. Bakker (eds), 21–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T.
1988Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Todd, L.
1980Pidginization and creolization. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1: 19–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsurumi, E. P.
1977Japanese Colonial Education in Taiwan, 1895–1945. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar