Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Contact Linguistics: In honour of Pieter Muysken
Edited by Norval Smith, Tonjes Veenstra and Enoch O. Aboh
[Contact Language Library 57] 2020
► pp. 261–282

Mixing and semantic transparency in the genesis of Yilan Japanese

ORCID logo | University of Queensland
In this short piece, the so-called ‘Yilan Creole’ spoken in Yilan County, Taiwan (Republic of China) is reanalysed in light of contemporary discussions on mixing and the transparency principle as factors behind the genesis of languages. I argue that there is evidence to conceive the emergence of this vernacular as a case of Atayal+Japanese language mixing (rather than creolisation), whereby a large amount of lexicon, e.g. nouns, verbs, and particles, have been retained maintaining not only their original phonological form, but operating in the original Atayal way, within an all-encompassing Japanese grammar skeleton. In addition, a discussion on the transparency principle as a key factor in the genesis of this mixed language is brought into focus.
Keywords: mixed language, semantic transparency, Yilan Creole, Japanese, Atayal, Formosan languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Yilan “creole” of Taiwan
  • 3.Is Yilan Creole a creole?
    • 3.1Creole-like grammatical structures in Yilan Creole
  • 4.Yilan Japanese as a mixed language
  • 5.Semantic transparency in Yilan Japanese
    • 5.1Uniformity
    • 5.2Universality
    • 5.3Simplicity
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • List of conventions (following the Leipzig glossing rules)
  • References
Published online: 29 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.57.09roj
References (35)
References
Arends, J. T. G. 1994. The socio-historical background of creoles. In Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction, Arends, Muysken & Smith (eds), 15–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arends, J., Muysken, P. C. & Smith, N. (eds). 1994. Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction [Creole Language Library 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. 1973. Variation and Linguistic Theory. Arlington VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bakker, P., & Muysken, P. C. 1994. Mixed languages and language intertwining. In Arends, Muysken & Smith (eds), 41–52.Google Scholar
Chien, Y. 2015. The lexical system of Yilan Creole. In New Advances in Formosan Linguistics, E. Zeitoun, S. F. Teng & J. J. Wu (eds), 513–532. Canberra: Asian Pacific Linguistics. <[URL]> (27 April 2020).
2016. Yilan Creole case marking. NINJAL Research Papers 10: 1–17.Google Scholar
Chien, Y. & Sanada, S. 2010. Yilan Creole in Taiwan. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 25(2): 350–357.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Taiwan no giran kureouru ni okeru hiteiji: -nay to -ng no henyou o megutte (Negation in Taiwan’s Yilan Creole: Focusing on -nay and -ng). Gengo Kenkyu [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan] 140: 73–87.Google Scholar
Coșeriu, E. 1981. Lecciones de lingüística general. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gorbunova, I. M. 2014. The category of phasal polarity in Atayal. ВОПРОСЫ ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИЯ 3.Google Scholar
2017. Грамматическая семантика атаяльского глагола в типологической перспективе (The Grammatical Semantics of Atayal Verbs from a Typological Perspective). PhD dissertation, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow.Google Scholar
Kaiser, S., Ichikawa, Y., Kobayashi, N., & Yamamoto, H. 2013. Japanese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, F. 2013. Mixed languages. In Contact Languages: A Comprehensive Guide, P. Bakker & Y. Matras (eds), 159–228. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. C. 1981. Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In Historicity and Variation in Creole Studies, A. Highfield & A. Valdman (eds), 52–78. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
2000. Semantic transparency in Lowland Ecuadorian Quechua morphosyntax. Linguistics 38(5): 973–988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Functional Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Gradual restructuring in Ecuadorian Quechua. In Gradual Creolization: Studies Celebrating Jacques Arends [Creole Language Library 34], R. Selbach, H. Cardoso & M van den Berg (eds), 77–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. C. & Smith, N. S. H. 1994. Introduction: The study of pidgin and creole languages. In Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction, Arends, Muysken & Smith (eds), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C. 1993. Duelling languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2003. What lies beneath: Split (mixed) languages as contact phenomena. In The Mixed Language Debate: Theoretical and Empirical Advances, Y. Matras & P. Bakker (eds), 73–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
O’Connor, L. M. & Muysken, P. C. 2014. The Native Languages of South America. Origins, Development, Typology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Qiu, P. 2015. A Preliminary Investigation of Yilan Creole in Taiwan: Discussing Predicate Position in Yilan Creole. MA thesis, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Rau, D.-H. V. 1992. A Grammar of Atayal. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Sanada, S. 2010. Yilan Creole in Taiwan: A Japanese-lexicon creole. Lecture presented at the International Centre for Japanese Studies. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (27 April 2020).
Seuren, P. A. M. 1972. Autonomous versus semantic syntax. Foundations of Language 8(2): 237–265.Google Scholar
2018. Semantic Syntax, 2nd rev. edn. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M. & Wekker, H. 1986. Semantic transparency as a factor in Creole genesis. In Substrata Versus Universals in Creole Genesis: Papers from the Amsterdam Creole Workshop, April 1985 [Creole Language Library 1], P. C. Muysken & N. Smith (eds), 57–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4): 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. S. H. 1994. An annotated list of creoles, pidgins, and mixed languages. In Arends, Muysken & Smith (eds), 331–374.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. 2003. Social factors and linguistic processes in the emergence of stable mixed languages. In The Mixed Language Debate: Theoretical and Empirical Advances, Y. Matras & P. Bakker (eds), 21–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Todd, L. 1980. Pidginization and creolization. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1: 19–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsurumi, E. P. 1977. Japanese Colonial Education in Taiwan, 1895–1945. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar