Part of
Advances in Contact Linguistics: In honour of Pieter Muysken
Edited by Norval Smith, Tonjes Veenstra and Enoch O. Aboh
[Contact Language Library 57] 2020
► pp. 341364
Agar, M.
1994Language Shock: Understanding the Culture of Conversation. New York NY: William Morrow and Company.Google Scholar
Agha, A.
2005Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 38–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P.
2004Non-standard evidence in syntactic typology: Methodological remarks on the use of dialect data vs. spoken language data. In Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-linguistic Perspective, B. Kortmann (ed.), 69–92. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Antonsich, M.
2010Searching for belonging – An analytical framework. Geography Compass 4(6): 644–659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J.
2006Multilingualism, diaspora, and the internet: Codes and identities on German-based diaspora websites. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(4): 520–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M.
1984 [1968]Rabelais and his World. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Barbiers, S., van der Auwera, J., Bennis, H. J., Boef, E., De Vogelaer, G. & van der Ham, M.
2008Syntactische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten Deel II (Syntactic atlas of the Dutch dialects Vol. II). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beal, J.
2009“You’re Not from New York City, You’re from Rotherham” Dialect and identity in British Indie music. Journal of English Linguistics 37(3): 223–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K.
2005Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, A.-D.
2009Belonging and unbelonging from an intersectional perspective. Gender, Technology and Development 13(21): 21–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L.
1994De Syntactische Variatie in het Algemeen Nederlands van Heerlen. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2013Recent developments in the Limburg dialect region. In Language and Space – Dutch: An International Handbook, F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (eds), 378–399. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L. & de Rooij, V.
2015Belonging through languagecultural practices in the periphery: The politics of carnival in the Dutch province of Limburg. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 24(1): 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Katanga Swahili and Heerlen Dutch: A sociohistorical and linguistic comparison of contact varieties in mining regions. International Journal for the Sociology of Language 258: 35–70.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., de Rooij, V. & Smakman, D.
2017The Randstad area in The Netherlands. Emergent and fluid identity-locality production through language in use. In Urban Sociolinguistics: The City as a Linguistic Process and Experience, D. Smakman & P. Heine (eds), 162–180. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., de Rooij, V., & Stengs, I.
2017Carnivalesque language use and the construction of local identities: A plea for languageculture as a field of research. Jahrbuch für Europäische Ethnologie/Yearbook of European Ethnology 12: 61–89.Google Scholar
Cornips, L., de Rooij, V., Stengs, I., & Thissen, L.
2016Dialect and local media: Reproducing the multi-dialectal hierarchical space in Limburg (the Netherlands). In Style, Media and Language Ideologies, J. Thøgersen, N. Coupland & J. Mortensen (eds), 189–216. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Cornips, L. & Knotter, A.
2017Inventing Limburg (The Netherlands): Territory, history, language, and identity. In Räume, Grenzen, Übergänge, Akten des 5. Kongresses der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen (IGDD) [ZDL. Beihefte. 170], H. Christen, P. Gilles & C. Purschke (eds), 71–91. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Driessen, G.
2006Ontwikkelingen in het gebruik van streektalen en dialecten in de periode 1995–2003. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 75: 103–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P.
2011Fractals all the way down. Lecture at NIAS symposium ‘Constructie van lokale identiteit door taal en cultuur’, Wassenaar 1 December.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E.
1940The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Extra, G.
2004Taal en identiteit. De vitaliteit van minderheidstalen in vergelijkend perspectief. Taal en Tongval 56(17): 109–134.Google Scholar
Gal, S., & Irvine, J.
1995The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62(4): 967–1001.Google Scholar
Hagen, A. & Giesbers, H.
1988Dutch sociolinguistic studies. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 73: 29–44.Google Scholar
Hanks, W.
1996Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hinskens, F. & Taeldeman, J.
2013Introduction. In Language and Space: Dutch: An International Handbook, F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (eds), 1–12. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B.
2011aLanguage and place. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics, R. Mesthrie (ed.), 203–217. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011bDialect enregisterment in performance. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(5): 657–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking. Language and Linguistics Compass 10: 632–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kats, J.
1952De dialecten van de mijnstreek. In Mijn en spoor in goud. Jubileumuitgave, M. Kemp (ed.), 316–318. Maastricht.Google Scholar
Kessels-van der Heijde, M.
2002Maastricht, Maestricht, Mestreech [Maaslandse Monografieen 65]. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Knotter, A.
2009Limburg bestaat niet. Paradoxen van een sterke identiteit. In Dit is Limburg! Opstellen over de Limburgse Identiteit, A. Knotter (ed.), 263–277. Maastricht: Sociaal Historisch Centrum voor Limburg & Zwolle: Waanders.Google Scholar
2011Regional character and regional stereotypes: Some thoughts about their construction in Dutch Limburg. Lecture at NIAS symposium ‘Constructie van lokale identiteit door taal en cultuur’. Wassenaar 1 December.Google Scholar
Leppänen, S.
2012Linguistic and generic hybridity in Web writing: The case of fan Fiction. In Language Mixing and Code-switching in Writing: Approaches to Mixed-language Written Discourse, M. Sebba, S. Mahootian & C. Jonsson (eds), 233–254. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Massey, D.
1993Power geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam & L. Tickner (eds), 59–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mathijsen, M.
2011De Limburger als de ander. Echt: Letterkundig Centrum Limburg.Google Scholar
Milroy, J.
2001Language ideology and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5: 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Münstermann, H. & Hagen, A.
1986Functional and structural aspects of dialect loss: A research plan and some first results. In Language Attrition in Progress, B. Weltens, K. de Bot & T. van Els (eds), 75–96. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, S. & Kelly-Holmes, H.
2013Multilingualism and the periphery. In Multilingualism and the Periphery, S. Pietikäinen & H. Kelly-Holmes (eds), 1–16. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. R.
2013Language with an attitude. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (eds), 157–182. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M.
1985Language and the culture of gender. In Semiotic Mediation, E. Mertz & R. Parmentier (eds), 219–259. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Monoglot ‘Standard’ in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In The Matrix of Language: Contemporary Linguistic Anthropology, D. Brenneis & R. K. S. MacAulay (eds), 284–306. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stuyck, K., Luyten, S., Kesteloot, C., Meert, H. & Peleman, K.
2008A geography of gender relations role Patterns in the context of different regional industrial development. Regional Studies 42(1): 69–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C.
n.d. Hip Hop parody as veiled critique. Unpublished paper (to appear in African American Language in Pop Culture). [URL]> (21 February 2017).
Thissen, L.
2013The ambiguities of Limburgerness: Language, place, and belonging in Limburg, the Netherlands. Etnofoor 25(2): 119–143.Google Scholar
2018Talking in and out of Place. Ethnographic Reflections on Language, Place, and (Un)belonging in Limburg, the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, Maastricht University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T.
1988Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Spotti, M., Juffermans, K., Cornips, L., Kroon, S. & Blommaert, J.
2014Globalisation in the margins: Toward a re-evalution of language and mobility. Applied Linguistics Review 5(1): 23–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, J.
2013 [1994]On the definition of dialect with reference to Yemeni dialects of Arabic. In Arabic Sociolinguistics. Issues and Perspectives, Y. Suleiman (ed.), 237–250. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weijnen, A.
1967Sociodialectische onderzoekingen in Limburg. Taalsociologie 32: 16–31.Google Scholar
Wijers, C.
1995Prinsen & clowns in het Limburgse narrenrijk: Het carnaval in Simpelveld en Roermond 1945–1992. Amsterdam: P.J. Meertens-Instituut.Google Scholar
Woolard, K.
2008Why dat now? Linguistic-anthropological contributions to the explanation of sociolinguistic icons and change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 432–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N.
2006Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice 40(3): 197–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Cornips, Leonie & Louis van den Hengel
2021. Renewing the coal mining past. International Journal of Language and Culture 8:2  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.