Cover not available
Article published In:
Concentric
Vol. 46:2 (2020) ► pp.173–205

Acquiring the polysemous adverb HAI in Chinese by English-speaking, Japanese-speaking, and Korean-speaking CSL learners

| National Taiwan Normal University
| National Kaohsiung Normal University
Using corpus analysis and error analysis, this study investigates English-speaking, Japanese-speaking, and Korean-speaking Chinese learners’ acquisition of various meanings of hai in Mandarin Chinese, including its temporal meaning ‘still, yet’ as well as its abundant atemporal meanings involving addition, comparison and counter-expectation. We found a preponderance of misselection errors across the three groups of learners. The next most common error type for the Japanese-speaking and Korean-speaking learners was omission, while omission and over-inclusion were equally challenging for the English-speaking learners. Further analysis of errors in misselection shows that many learners failed to distinguish the temporal hai from the atemporal haishi required in a concessive sentence for the counter-expectation meaning.
Keywords: Chinese adverb hai , Chinese as a second language, learner corpus, error analysis, second language acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Various uses of hai
    • 2.1Temporal hai
    • 2.2Additive hai
    • 2.3Comparative hai
    • 2.4Moderate hai
    • 2.5Counter-expectation (CE) hai
    • 2.6Derivations of various uses of hai
  • 3.Data collection and classification
    • 3.1The data
    • 3.2The analytical framework
    • 3.3Identification and categorization of errors
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1The uses of hai in the data of the English-speaking, Japanese-speaking, and Korean-speaking CSL learners
    • 4.2Errors made by the CSL learners
      • 4.2.1Errors made by the English-speaking CSL learners
      • 4.2.2Errors made by the Japanese-speaking CSL learners
      • 4.2.3Errors made by the Korean-speaking CSL learners
    • 4.3Overall discussions
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 28 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00017.hsi
References (48)
References
Aosakul, Woraphras. 2011. A Comparative Study and the Error Analysis on Adverbs Hai, You, Zai in Mandarin and Ik and Corresponding Word in Tai. MA thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent, and Paul Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2004. Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5.1:107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11.1:1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Style of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text & Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 9.1:93–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biq, Yung-O. 2004. From collocation to idiomatic expression: The grammaticalization of hao phrases/constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing 14.2:73–95.Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia, and George Lakoff. 1988. Cognitive topology and lexical networks. Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology and Artificial Intelligence, ed. by Steven L. Small, Garrison W. Cottrell and Michael K. Tanenhaus, 477–508. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cai, Jinting. 2013. Lexical transfer in Chinese EFL learners’ motion event expressions: Group tendency and individual variation. Paper presented at the 2nd SLA Summit Forum in China, Ningbo.
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Fred Jyun-gwang. 2006. Interplay between forward and backword transfer in L2 and L1 writing: The case of Chinese ESL learners in the US. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 32.1:147–196.Google Scholar
Corder, Stephen Pit. 1967. The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5.1–4:161–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donazzan, Marta. 2008. Presupposition on times and degrees: The semantics of Mandarin hai . Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20), vol. 21, ed. by Marjorie K. M. Chan and Hana Kang, 597–610. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Dulay, Heidi C., Marina K. Burt, and Stephen D. Krashen. 1982. Language Two. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hou, Xuechao (ed.) 2004. Xiandai Hanyu Xuci Cidian [Dictionary of Modern Chinese Function Words]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
James, Carl. 1998. Errors in Language and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Jiang, Xiezhong. 2013. Riben liuxuesheng Hanyu fuci hai de xide kaocha [A study of the Japanese students’ acquisition of Chinese adverb hai ]. Haiwai Huawen Jiaoyu 11:71–78.Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo, and Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. Schematic meaning and pragmatic inference: The Mandarin adverbs hai, zai and you . Corpora 4.1:33–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing, Xuanjiao. 2012. Hanguo Liuxuesheng Xide Chongfu Yi Hai, Zai, You de Pianwu Fenxi [The Error Analyses of Korean Students’ Acquisition of Repeated Meaning: Hai, Zai, You ]. MA thesis, Jilin University, Changchun.Google Scholar
Kleinmann, Howard H. 1977. Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 27.1:93–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. The strategy of avoidance in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Acquisition Research: Issues and Implications, ed. by William C. Ritchie, 157–174. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Lin. 2009. A study of the factors in Relation to errors incurred from the acquisition of Chinese modal adverbs. Journal of Yunnan Normal University: Teaching and Research on Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition 61:31–35.Google Scholar
Li, Yanze. 2011. Waiguo Liuxuesheng Chongfuyi Fuci Zai, Hai, Ye, You de Pianwu Fenxi [An Analysis on the Repeated-meaning Adverbs Zai, Hai, Ye, You: Errors Made by Foreign Students in Learning Chinese]. MA thesis, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian.Google Scholar
Liu, Feng-hsi. 2000. The scalar particle hai in Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 29.1:41–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Huijuan. 2009. Additive Particles in Adult and Child Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Liu, Huiying. 2011. Chuji Jieduan Riben Liuxuesheng Xuexi Hanyu Biao Chongfuyi Fuci Zai, You, Hai de Pianwu Fenxi [An Error Analysis of Japanese Students at Primary Level in Learning Chinese Adverbs Zai, You, Hai ]. MA thesis, Central China Normal University, Wuhan.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 Words in Modern Chinese]. Hong Kong: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Zhen. 1999. Guanyu biao chongfu de fuci you, zai, hai [Concerning the adverbs you, zai, hai expressing repetition]. Xiandai Hanyu Xuci Sanlun, 128–142. Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Mandarin Teaching Center at NTNU. 2008. Practical Audio-Visual Chinese (2nd edition). Taipei: Zhengzhong Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Mao, Jingya. 2011. The Comparison of Hai, Zai, You, Ye and Analysis on Errors Made by L2 Learners. MA thesis, Central China Normal University, Wuhan.Google Scholar
Norrish, John. 1983. Language Learners and Their Errors. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Prator, Clifford H. 1971. Phonetics vs. phonemics in the ESL classroom: When is allophonic accuracy important? TESOL Quarterly 5.1:61–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Richards, Jack C., and Richard Schmidt. 2002. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (3rd edition). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4.3:328–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104.3:192–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1978. Principles of categorization. Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schachter, Jacqueline. 1974. An error in error analysis. Language Learning 24.2:205–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Learning 10.3:209–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 2001. Gen fuci hai youguan de liangge jushi [Two constructions with hai in Mandarin Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 61:483–493.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Dieter Stein and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Guo. 2009. Fuci hai de zhuguanxing yongfa [The subjective uses of the adverb hai ]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 31:322–333.Google Scholar
Wu, Ying. 2010. Haishi de duoyixing yu xide nandu [On the polysemy of haishi and its difficulty in learning]. Huawen Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 41:41–48.Google Scholar
Yang, Ching-Yu Helen. 2017. On the syntax-semantics interface of focus particles: The additive particle hai ‘HAI’ in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua Sinica 31, article no. 3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Meng. 1998. On hai in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 26.2:236–280.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chai, Xingsan & Jie Bao
2023. Linguistic distances between native languages and Chinese influence acquisition of Chinese character, vocabulary, and grammar. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.