Cover not available
Article published In:
Concentric
Vol. 47:1 (2021) ► pp.93–112

Nativised structural patterns of make light verb construction in Malaysian English

| Universiti Sains Malaysia
| Universiti Sains Malaysia
This study investigated nativised structural patterns of light verb constructions (LVCs) in Malaysian English using a corpus-based, descriptive approach to analyse grammatical innovations. To facilitate the analysis, a 100-million-word general corpus comprising threads from Lowyat.Net, a popular Internet forum in Malaysia, was created, and the British National Corpus (BNC) was used as the reference corpus. Using the Sketch Engine corpus tool, the three most frequently occurring make LVCs in the Malaysian English corpus were identified. The data was analysed to reveal the differences between the structures of make LVC in Malaysian English and its prototypical structure. The findings show that besides the non-isomorphic deverbal noun form, make LVCs in Malaysian English prefer taking the basic constituents of an LVC. Nativised LVCs are essentially those with zero articles and isomorphic deverbal nouns taking definite articles, determiners, and descriptive adjectives in their modifier slots. The zero article LVC is the most common nativised structure pattern due to the influence of substrate languages in Malaysian English.
Keywords: Malaysian English, light verb constructions, LVCs, nativisation, structural pattern
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Light verb constructions
  • 3.Material and method
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Structural patterns of LVCs in Malaysian English
    • 4.2Nativised LVC in Malaysian English
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 19 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00024.rah
References (56)
References
Alatis, James E., and Peter H. Lowenberg. 2001. The three circles of English: An afterword to the conference in honour of Professor Braj B. Kachru. The Three Circles of English: Language Specialists Talk about the English language, ed. by Edwin Thumboo, 428–431. Singapore: UniPress.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 1995. Having a look at the expanded predicate. The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, ed. by Bas Aarts and Charles F. Meyer, 203–217. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asmah, Haji Omar. 1996. Post-imperial English in Malaysia. Post-Imperial English: Status Change in Former British and American Colonies 1940–1990, ed. by Joshua A. Fishman, Andrew W. Conrad and Alma Rubal-Lopez, 513–534. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Azirah, Hashim. 2007. The use of Malaysian English in creative writing. Asian Englishes 10.2:30–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baskaran, Loga Mahesan. 1994. The Malaysian English mosaic: An outline of the three social dialects and hybrid style of a vigorous ‘New English’. English Today 10.1:27–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. A Malaysian English Premier: Aspects of Malaysian English Features. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: University of Malaya Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Edinburgh, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia. 2001. Light verbs and polysemy. Language Sciences 23.4–5:551–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2003. The light verbs jungle. Workshop on Multi-Verb Constructions. Retrieved September 17, 2020, from [URL]
Claridge, Claudia. 2007. Constructing a corpus from the web: Message boards. Corpus Linguistics and the Web, ed. by Marianne Hundt, Nadja Nesselhaul and Carolin Biewer, 87–108. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2014. Modal expressions in Malaysian English. English in Malaysia: Postcolonial and Beyond, ed. by Hajar Abdul Rahim and Shakila Abdul Manan, 127–160. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2005. She gave him a look, they both had a laugh and then took a stroll: give a verb, have a verb and take a verb constructions. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar, ed. by Robert M. W. Dixon, 459–483. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion. 2013. The synchronic and diachronic status of English light verbs. Linguistic Variation 13.1:48–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giparaitė, Judita. 2016. Complementation of light verb constructions in World Englishness: A corpus-based study. Žmogus ir žodis (Svetimosios kalbos) 18.3:19–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. A Corpus-Based Study of the Modification of Light Verb Constructions with the Deverbal Noun Laugh in British, American, and some Asian Varieties of English. Retrieved September 17, 2020, from [URL]
Goh, Gabey. 2014. Digerati50: Building Online Communities, the ‘Content Way’. Retrieved February 10, 2020, from [URL]
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike, and Stefanie Pillai. 2014. Prosodic marking of information structure by Malaysian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36.2:283–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajar, Abdul Rahim. 2014. Malaysian English lexis: Postcolonial and beyond. English in Malaysia: Postcolonial and Beyond, ed. by Hajar Abdul Rahim and Shakila Abdul Manan, 35–54. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hajar, Abdul Rahim, and Harshita Aini Haroon. 2003. The use of native lexical items in English texts as a codeswitching strategy. Extending the Scope of Corpus-based Research: New Applications, New Challenges, ed. by Sylviane Granger and Stephanie Petch-Tyson, 159–175. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hill, Jimmie. 2000. Revisiting priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success. Teaching Collocation: Further Development in the Lexical Approach, ed. by Michael Lewis, 47–69. London: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Marianne Hundt, and Joybrato Mukherjee. 2011. Indian English—an emerging epicentre? A pilot study on light verbs in web-derived corpora of South Asian Englishes. Anglia 129.3–4:258–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1981. The pragmatics of non-native varieties of English. English for Cross-Cultural Communication, ed. by Larry E. Smith, 15–39. London: Macmillan Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Gerard. 2001. Till divorce do us part: The case of Singaporean and Malaysian English. Evolving Identities: The English Language in Singapore and Malaysia, ed. by Vincent B. Y. Ooi, 125–139. Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar
Live, Anna. H. 1973. The take-have phrasal in English. Linguistics 11.95:31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowenberg, Peter H., and Tom McArthur. 1992. Malaysian English. The Oxford Companion to the English Language, ed. by Tom McArthur, 640–644. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2011. Corpora and the New Englishes: Using the ‘Corpus of Cyber-Jamaican’ to explore research perspectives for the future. A Taste for Corpora: In Honour of Sylviane Granger, ed. by Fanny Meunier, Sylvie De Cock, Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Magali Paquot, 209–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McArthur, Tom. 2002. The Oxford Guide to World English. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehl, Seth. 2017. Light verb semantics in the International Corpus of English: Onomasiological variation, identity evidence and degrees of lightness. English Language & Linguistics 23.1:55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. 2007. New variety or learner English? Criteria for variety status and the case of Euro-English. English World-Wide 28.2:167–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morais, Elaine. 2001. Lectal varieties of Malaysian English. Evolving Identities: The English Language in Singapore and Malaysia, ed. by Vincent B. Y. Ooi, 33–52. Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2007. Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: Present-day Indian English as an equilibrium. Journal of English Linguistics 35.2:157–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nair-Venugopal, Shanta. 2000. English, identity and the Malaysian workplace. World Englishes 19.2:205–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newbrook, Mark. 2006. Malaysian English: Status, norms, some grammatical and lexical features. World Englishes: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, ed. by Kingsley Bolton and Braj B. Kachru, 390–417. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pillai, Stefanie. 2014. The monophthongs and diphthongs of Malaysian English: An instrumental analysis. English in Malaysia: Postcolonial and Beyond, ed. by Hajar Abdul Rahim and Shakila Abdul Manan, 55–86. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pillai, Stefanie, Zuraidah Mohd Don, Gerald Knowles, and Jennifer Tang. 2010. Malaysian English: An instrumental analysis of vowel contrasts. World Englishes 29.2:159–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platt, John T., Heidi Weber, and Ho Mian Lian. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sand, Andrea. 2004. Shared morpho-syntactic features in contact varieties of English: Article use. World Englishes 23.2:281–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79.2:233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shahrokny-Prehn, Arian, and Silke Höche. 2011. Rising through the registers—A corpus-based account of the stylistic constraints on light verb constructions. Corpus 101:239–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2012. Shared features in New Englishes. Areal Features of the Anglophone World, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 211–232. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John, and Gwyneth Fox. 1990. Collins Cobuild English Grammar. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Sketch Engine. 2018. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from [URL]
Smith, Adam. 2009. Light verbs in Australian, New Zealand and British English. Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond, ed. by Pam Peters, Peter Collins and Adam Smith, 139–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soo, Kengsoon. 1990. Malaysian English at the crossroad: Some sign-posts. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 11.3:199–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Peter K. W. 1998. Malay loan words across different dialects of English. English Today 14.4:44–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Siew Imm. 2009. Lexical borrowing in Malaysian English: Influences of Malay. Lexis 31:11–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Nativised prepositional verbs in Malaysian English from the perspective of language contact. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies 19.3:103–114.Google Scholar
Vincze, Veronika, István, Nagy T., and Gábor Berend. 2011. Detecting noun compounds and light verb constructions: A contrastive study. Paper presented at the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: From Parsing and Generation to the Real World (MWE 2011), Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront, Oregon.
Wahid, Ridwan. 2013. Definite article usage across varieties of English. World Englishes 32.1:23–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, Toshiko, and Magnús Pḗtursson. 2012. Voiceless stop consonants in Malaysian English: Measuring the VOT values. Asian Englishes 15.2:60–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zarifi, Abdolvahed, and Jayakaran Mukundan. 2014. Grammatical presentation of phrasal verbs in ESL textbooks. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities 22.2:649–664.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Giparaitė, Judita
2024. A corpus-based analysis of light verb constructions with MAKE and DO in British English. Kalbotyra 76 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.