Article published In:
Vol. 48:2 (2022) ► pp.212248
Ahrens, Kathleen, and Menghan Jiang
2020Source domain verification using corpus-based tools. Metaphor and Symbol 35.1:43–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19.3:273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgers, Christian
2016Conceptualizing change in communication through metaphor. Journal of Communication 66.2:250–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgers, Christian, and Kathleen Ahrens
2020Change in metaphorical framing: Metaphors of trade in 225 years of State of the Union addresses (1790–2014). Applied Linguistics 41.2:260–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Linda, and Ramon H. Myers
1994The first Chinese democracy: Political development of the Republic of China on Taiwan, 1986–1994. Asian Survey 34.3:213–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2019Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake? Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cibulskienė, Jurga
Dorst, Aletta G., and Anna G. Kaal
2012Metaphor in discourse: Beyond the boundaries of MIP. Metaphor in Use: Context, Culture, and Communication, ed. by Fiona MacArthur, José Luis Oncins-Martínez, Manuel Sánchez-García and Ana María Piquer-Píriz, 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyfuss, Caroline
2015Taiwanese student sit-in for democratic reform (Wild Lily Movement) 1990. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from [URL]
Fairclough, Norman
1989Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001Language and Power (2nd edition). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew
2007Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology, vol. 231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heywood, Andrew
2017Political Ideologies: An Introduction. London: Macmillan International Higher Education. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hood, Steven J.
2020The Kuomintang and the Democratization of Taiwan. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, and Shu-Kai Hsieh
2010Infrastructure for Cross-lingual Knowledge Representation – Towards Multilingualism in Linguistic Studies. Taiwan NSC-granted Research Project (NSC 96-2411-H-003-061-MY3). Retrieved March 10, 2021, from [URL]
Jacobs, J. Bruce
2012Democratizing Taiwan. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrž, and David Tugwell
2004The sketch engine. Proceedings of the 11th EURALEX International Congress, ed. by Williams Geoffrey and Sandra Vessier, 105–116.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel
2014The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 11:7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2015Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
2008The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
2014The All New Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
2016Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think (3rd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Nancy
2011Taiwanese Student Sit-in for Democratic Reform (Wild Lily Movement) 1990. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from [URL]
Lu, Louis Wei-Lun, and Kathleen Ahrens
2008Ideological influence on building metaphors in Taiwanese presidential speeches. Discourse & Society 19.3:383–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2006Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 21.1:23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Metaphor in the discourse-historical approach. Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 45–66. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
2016Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
2017Truths, lies and figurative scenarios: Metaphors at the heart of Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics 16.5:641–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niles, Ian, and Adam Pease
2001Towards a standard upper ontology. Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, vol. 2001, ed. by Guarino Nicola, Barry Smith, and Christopher Welty, 2–9. Retrieved March 10, 2021, from [URL]. DOI logo
Pragglejaz Group
2007MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22.1:1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2008Rhetoric of political speeches. Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, vol. 41, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller, 243–270. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2009The discourse-historical approach (DHA). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2017The discourse-historical approach. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 44–59. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roy, Denny
2003Taiwan: A Political History. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Tryntje Pasma
2010A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU, vol. 141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wachman, Alan. M.
1994Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization. Armonk, New York, and London: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Wei, Jennifer M., and Ren-feng Duann
Wodak, Ruth
1999Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on Language & Social Interaction 32.1–2:185–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001The discourse-historical approach. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2009Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis 21:1–33.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Salomi Boukala
Wong, Joseph
2001Dynamic democratization in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China 10.27:339–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Winnie Huiheng, Christian Burgers, and Kathleen Ahrens
2021Framing metaphor use over time: ‘Free Economy’ metaphors in Hong Kong political discourse (1997–2017). Lingua 2521:102955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar