Part of
Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in political discourseEdited by Ruth Wodak
[Critical Theory 7] 1989
► pp. 95–
Edited by Ruth Wodak
[Critical Theory 7] 1989
► pp. 95–
Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Abrahamyan, Samvel A. & Maria A. Banshchikova
2020. Peculiarities of Argumentative Strategies of Modern English Political Discourse. In Functional Approach to Professional Discourse Exploration in Linguistics, ► pp. 165 ff. 
ALAGHBARY, Gibreel Sadeq
2020. Looting leads to shooting: A pragma-dialectical analysis of President Trump’s argumentative discourse on Floyd’s death. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 16:4 ► pp. 1854 ff.
Bar-Lev, Zev
2007. Mrs Goldberg's rebuttal of Butt et al.. Discourse & Society 18:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B & Mercedes Díez-Prados
2014. Positive self-evaluation versus negative other-evaluation in the political genre of pre-election debates. Discourse & Society 25:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana Belén
2023. Transitivity and evaluation in American and Spanish parliamentary discourse: the 2015 State of the Union Address in the US vs. the 2015 State of the Nation Address in Spain. Critical Discourse Studies 20:2 ► pp. 128 ff.
Carpini, Michael X. Delli, Fay Lomax Cook & Lawrence R. Jacobs
2004. PUBLIC DELIBERATION, DISCURSIVE PARTICIPATION, AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7:1 ► pp. 315 ff.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2021. Naming as doing: Identities, positioning, and ideologies in capital trials. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
Cochran, Effie Papatzikou & Cheryl Comeau-Kirschner
2016. The language of parole: sex offenders’ discourse strategy use in Indeterminate Sentence Review Board hearings. <i>WORD</i> 62:4 ► pp. 244 ff.
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
2014. Euphemisms and political discourse in the British regional press. Brno Studies in English 40:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Díez-Prados, Mercedes & Ana Belén Cabrejas-Peñuelas
2020. Construction and negotiation of voter-friendly identities in electoral debates. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 82 ► pp. 93 ff.
Ekawati, Rosyida
2019. POWER THROUGH LINGUISTIC MODALITIES IN INDONESIAN PRESIDENTIAL SPEECHES. Discourse and Interaction 12:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Gilyasev, Yu. V.
2019. Academic authenticity of neuro-linguistic programming as a discursive practice. Professional Discourse & Communication 1:4 ► pp. 33 ff.
Huang, Hen Hsen, Chi Hsin Yu, Tai Wei Chang, Cong Kai Lin & Hsin Hsi Chen
2014. 2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT), ► pp. 87 ff.
Husar, Jörg
2016. A Comparative Approach to Foreign Policy Discourse Analysis. In Framing Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa [Contributions to Political Science, ], ► pp. 41 ff.
Marlow-Stevens, Samuel & Richard Hayton
2021. A Rhetorical Political Analysis of Theresa May’s Statecraft on Brexit. Parliamentary Affairs 74:4 ► pp. 871 ff.
Njuguna, Bernard G. & Helga Schröder
2022. Figurative language and persuasion in CPG sermons: The Example of a Gĩkũyũ televangelist. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 18:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Sahlane, Ahmed
2012. Argumentation and Fallacy in the Justification of the 2003 War on Iraq. Argumentation 26:4 ► pp. 459 ff.
Taylor-Heine, Maravene & Terri S. Wilson
2022. Discursive burdens: negotiating difference in an education movement. Journal of Education Policy 37:3 ► pp. 379 ff.
Toska, Bledar
2015. … every time you’ve offered an opinion, you’ve been wrong. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 55 ff.
Toyoda, Etsuko & David Chapman
2019. Family Matters: Nippon Kaigi and Keeping Things Normal. Japanese Studies 39:3 ► pp. 371 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.