Controversies Within the Scientific Revolution
Editors
From the beginning of the Scientific Revolution around the late sixteenth century to its final crystallization in the early eighteenth century, hardly an observational result, an experimental technique, a theory, a mathematical proof, a methodological principle, or the award of recognition and reputation remained unquestioned for long. The essays collected in this book examine the rich texture of debates that comprised the Scientific Revolution from which the modern conception of science emerged. Were controversies marginal episodes, restricted to certain fields, or were they the rule in the majority of scientific domains? To what extent did scientific controversies share a typical pattern, which distinguished them from debates in other fields? Answers to these historical and philosophical questions are sought through a close attention to specific controversies within and across the changing scientific disciplines as well as across the borders of the natural and the human sciences, philosophy, theology, and technology.
[Controversies, 11] 2011. vi, 287 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Introduction. Controversies and the dialectical texture of the Scientific Revolution | pp. 1–10
-
Part I. Astronomy and mechanics
-
Honoré Fabri S. J. and Galileo’s law of fall: What kind of controversy?Michael Elazar and Rivka Feldhay | pp. 13–32
-
Galileo, the Jesuits, and the controversy over the comets: What was The Assayer really about?Ofer Gal and Raz Chen-Morris | pp. 33–52
-
Fair-mindedness versus sophistry in the Galileo affair: Two controversies for the price of oneMaurice Finocchiaro | pp. 53–74
-
Part II. Light and gravity
-
From cohesion to pesanteur: The origins of the 1669 debate on the causes of gravityVictor D. Boantza | pp. 77–100
-
Leibniz versus Newton on the nature of gravity and planetary motionNir Grannot | pp. 101–122
-
The argumentative use of methodology: Lessons from a controversy following Newton’s first optical paperGábor Zemplén | pp. 123–148
-
Part III. Physiology and vitalism
-
Salient theories in the fossil debate in the early Royal Society: The influence of Johann Van HelmontAnna Marie Roos | pp. 151–170
-
Were the arguments of William Harvey convincing to his contemporaries?Adelino Cattani | pp. 171–186
-
Why was there no controversy over life in the Scientific Revolution?Charles T. Wolfe | pp. 187–220
-
Part IV. Human sciences and theology
-
The pre-Adamite controversy and the problem of racial difference in seventeenth-century natural philosophyJustin E.H. Smith | pp. 223–150
-
Scientific revolution in the moral sciences: The controversy between Samuel Pufendorf and the Lutheran theologians in the late seventeenth centuryMerio Scattola | pp. 251–276
-
Contributors | pp. 277–282
-
Index | pp. 283–288
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Jardine, Nicholas
Malaterre, Christophe, Emmanuelle J. Javaux & Purificación López-García
Bondi, Marina
2018. Dialogicity in written language use. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 137 ff.
Hostiou, Jeanne-Marie
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Philosophy
Main BIC Subject
PDX: History of science
Main BISAC Subject
SCI034000: SCIENCE / History