Chapter published in:
Controversies in the Contemporary World
Edited by Adriano Fabris and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 15] 2019
► pp. 728


Aristoteles, & , Kennedy, G. A.
(1991) On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (p. 77119163186). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breger, H., Herbst, J., Erdner, S.
(Eds.) (2011) Natur und Subject. vol. 3, Hannover: Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Castiglione, B.
(1724) The Courter. London.Google Scholar
Dascal, M.
(2003) Understanding misunderstanding. In M. Dascal, Interpretation and Understanding (pp. 293–321). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Towards a dialectic of tolerance. L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria 16(2), 529–541.Google Scholar
Dutens, L.
(Ed.) (1768) G. G. Leibnitii Opera Omnia. Geneva, VI, I.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R.
(1991). The study of argumentation from a speech act perspective. In J. Verschueren (ed.) Pragmatics at Issue. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 6:1 1991 Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 151–170.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
(1987) Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation 1, 283–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Meuffels, B.
(2012) Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation, 26, 33–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fabris, A.
(2007) Senso e indifferenza. Un clusterbook di filosofia. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
(2014) Etica della comunicazione. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Grice, P.
(1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L.
(1970) Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A.
(1997) In pursuit of wisdom: The scope of philosophy. Beverly Hills, CA]: Glencoe PressGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.
Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement humain” in GP V 39-509. Quoted from: Leibniz, G. W. (1997) New Essays on Human Understanding. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Locke, J.
(1979) An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, V.
(1991) Grammatica dell’argomentare. Strategie e strutture. Scandicci (Firenze): La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Mc Luhan, M.
(1988) Laws of media. The new science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. H.
(1999) The Columbia History in Western Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ronchi, R.
(2003) Teoria critica della comunicazione. Milano Bruno: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Scarafile, G.
(2011) “Non pas en parlant à la rigueur”: prototypes of Leibniz’s contrastive attitude in Chapter 27, book II, of the Nouveaux Essais sur l’entendement humain, p.1000–1008. In: (2011) Breger, H. et al. (2011).Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W.
(1964) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press. Urbana.Google Scholar