Cover not available
Part of
Controversies in the Contemporary World
Edited by Adriano Fabris and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 15] 2019
► pp. 127–143

Chapter 7
Dialogue in philosophical practices

The definition of the lowest common denominator of philosophical practices is widely debated: what is the philosophical core that allows us to distinguish them from other activities? Also, is it possible to identify a methodical peculiarity in philosophical practices? Indeed, many philosophical practitioners refer to dialogue as the specific philosophical character marking their professional activity. This statement, which as such is rather naive, is obviously somewhat problematic. However, philosophical practitioners stress the λόγος of dialogue.

In addition to investigating how the dialogue is understood in the different philosophical practices, this contribution aims at enhancing the διά, the “between” of dialogue. This dimension, in fact, may be a possible theoretical framework within which to understand philosophical practices as a whole.

Keywords: dialogue, Socratic dialogue, philosophy for children, philosophical practice, philosophical counselling, café-philo, critical thinking, way of life
Article outline
  • 1.Philosophical practices
  • 2.Defining philosophical practices
  • 3.Διαλέγεσθαι: practising the philosophical λόγος
    • 3.1Socratic dialogue
    • 3.2Philosophy for children
    • 3.3Philosophical counselling
    • 3.4Café-philo
  • 4.Διάλογος: transcendentality and transcendence of the “between”
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.15.08ber
References
Achenbach, G. B.
(1987) Philosophische Praxis (2nd ed.). Köln: Jürgen Dinter.Google Scholar
(2010) Zur Einführung der Philosophischen Praxis: Vorträge, Aufsätze, Gespräche und Essays, mit denen sich die Philosophische Praxis in den Jahren 1981 bis 2009 vorstellte; eine Dokumentation. Köln: Jürgen Dinter. This volume includes among other essays:Google Scholar
(2010a) Kurzgefaßte Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Philosophische Praxis? (pp. 15–17). (Original work published 1999).Google Scholar
(2010b) Philosophische Lebensberatung: Zur Kritik der auxiliaren Vernunft (pp. 31–41). (Original work published 1983).Google Scholar
(2010c) Der Philosoph als Praktiker (pp. 129–136). (Original work published 1982).Google Scholar
Aristotle
(1976)  Metaphysics: Books M and N (J. Annas, Trans. & Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bertolino, L.
(2008) Il problema della colpa: Per una fondazione della consulenza filosofica. In M. Buber, Colpa e sensi di colpa (L. Bertolino, Trans. & Ed.) (pp. 161–190). Milano: Apogeo.Google Scholar
(2016) Questioni di etica applicata per le pratiche filosofiche. Teoria: Rivista di filosofia, 36(2), 89–104.Google Scholar
Blanchard, J.-P.
(2004) Des modes d’animation d’un café-philo. Diotime: Revue internationale de didactique de la philosophie, 22. Retrieved January 31, 2018, from [URL].Google Scholar
Brivio, G., & Bertolino, L.
(2016) L’arte del dialogo nel café philo . Teoria: Rivista di filosofia, 36(1), 151–169.Google Scholar
Buber, M.
(1947) Dialogue. In Id., Between man and man (R. Gregor Smith, Trans.) (pp. 1–39). London: Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1929).Google Scholar
Cohen, E. D.
(2003) The process of Logic-Based Therapy: an approach to philosophical counseling. Pratiche Filosofiche / Philosophy Practice, 1(2), 39–48.Google Scholar
(2013) Theory and practice of Logic-Based Therapy: Integrating critical thinking and philosophy into psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Curnow, T.
(Ed.) (2001) Thinking through dialogue: Essays on philosophy in practice. Oxted: Practical Philosophy Press.Google Scholar
daVenza Tillmanns, M.
(2005) Philosophical counseling: understanding the unique self and other through dialogue. International Journal of Philosophical Practice, 2(4), 1–10. Retrieved January 31, 2018, from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J.
(1910) How we think. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1916) Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1929) Experience and nature (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1938) Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Fries, J. F.
(1807) Neue Kritik der Vernunft (3 vols.). Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press. (William James Lecture delivered 1967). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimes, P., & Uliana, R. L.
(1998) Philosophical Midwifery: A new paradigm for understanding human problems with its validation. Costa Mesa, CA: Hyparxis Press.Google Scholar
Gutknecht, T.
(2017) Über den Dialog in Philosophischer Praxis. In T. Gutknecht, H. Bennent-Vahle, & D. Schmalfuß-Plicht (Eds.), Kulturen des Dialogs: Vermittlungen Philosophischer Praxis (pp. 23–53). Berlin: Lit.Google Scholar
Hadot, P.
(1995) Philosophy as a way of life: Spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault (M. Chase, Trans.; A. I. Davidson, Ed.). Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kant, I.
(1996) An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? In Id., Practical philosophy (M. J. Gregor, Trans. & Ed.) (pp. 15–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1784).
https://doi.org/
Google Scholar
(1998) Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781; 1787, 2nd ed.). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kessels, J., Boers, E., & Mostert, P.
(2009) Free space: Field guide to conversations (P. Mostert & G. Meter, Trans.). Amsterdam: Boom. (Original work published 2008).Google Scholar
Lahav, R.
(2008) Cosa può imparare la consulenza filosofica da Buber? (I. Bertone, Trans.). In M. Buber, Colpa e sensi di colpa (L. Bertolino, Trans. & Ed.) (pp. 191–207). Milano: Apogeo.Google Scholar
(2016a) Handbook of philosophical-contemplative companionships: Principles, procedures, exercises. Chieti: Solfanelli.Google Scholar
(2016b) Stepping out of Plato’s cave: Philosophical practice and self-transformation. Hardwick, VT: Loyev Books.Google Scholar
LeBon, T.
(2001) Wise therapy: Philosophy for counsellors. London; New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lindseth, A.
(2005) Zur Sache der Philosophischen Praxis: Philosophieren in Gesprächen mit ratsuchenden Menschen. Freiburg: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Lipman, M.
(2003) Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S.
(1980) Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H.
(1910) The psychology of social consciousness implied in instruction. Science, 31(801), 688–693. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Nelson, L.
(2004) The Socratic method (T. K. Brown III, Trans.). In R. Saran & B. Neisser (Eds.), Enquiring minds: Socratic dialogue in education (pp. 126–165). Stoke on Trent, UK; Sterling, VA, USA: Trentham Books. (Original work published 1929).Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S.
(1877) Illustrations of the logic of sciences: I. The fixation of belief. Popular science monthly, 12, 1–15.Google Scholar
Phillips, C.
(2002) Socrates café: A fresh taste of philosophy. New York, NY; London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Plato
(1913) Phaedrus. In Id., Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus (H. N. Fowler, Trans.) (pp. 405–579). London: William Heinemann; New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1921) Sophist. In Id., Theaetetus. Sophist (H. N. Fowler, Trans.) (pp. 259–459). London: William Heinemann; New York, NY: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
(2013a) Republic: Books 1–5 (C. Emlyn-Jones & W. Preddy, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2013b) Republic: Books 6–10 (C. Emlyn-Jones & W. Preddy, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raabe, P. B.
(2001) Philosophical counseling: Theory and practice. Westport, CT; London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Regina, L.
(2006) Consulenza filosofica: un fare che è pensare. Milano: Unicopli.Google Scholar
Saran, R., & Neisser, B.
(Eds.). (2004) Enquiring minds: Socratic dialogue in education. Stoke on Trent, UK; Sterling, VA, USA: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
Sautet, M.
(1995) Un café pour Socrate. Comment la philosophie peut nous aider à comprendre le monde d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Robert Laffont.Google Scholar
Saw, R. L.
(1962) Conversation and communication. An inaugural lecture delivered at Birkbeck College, 29th October, 1962. London: Birkbeck College.Google Scholar
Schuster, S. C.
(1999) Philosophy practice: An alternative to counseling and psychotherapy. Westport, CT; London: Praeger.Google Scholar
UNESCO
(Ed.) (2007) La philosophie, une école de la liberté. Paris: Éditions UNESCO.Google Scholar
Volpone, A.
(2000) Crisis of rationality and the return to philosophical practice. Retrieved October 15, 2000, from [URL].Google Scholar
(2002) Pratiche filosofiche, forme di razionalità, modi del filosofare contemporaneo. Kykéion: Semestrale di idee in discussione, 8, 17–36. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2004) Beyond philosophical practices. Pratiche Filosofiche / Philosophy Practice, 2(3), 25–40.Google Scholar