Chapter published in:
Controversies in the Contemporary World
Edited by Adriano Fabris and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 15] 2019
► pp. 279296
References
Amman, K., & Knorr-Cetina, K.
(1990) The Fixation of (Visual) Evidence. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.). Representation in Scientific Practice (pp.cc-cc). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beauvais, F.
(2007) L’âme des molécules. Une histoire de la “ mémoire de l’eau ”. Breinigsville, Mille Mondes.Google Scholar
Benveniste, J.
(1988) Benveniste contre-attaque. L’Événement du jeudi, 11-17 août, 6–7.Google Scholar
Benveniste, J. et al.
(1991) L’agitation de solutions hautement diluée n’induit pas d’activité biologique spécifique, Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, tome 312, Série II. Google Scholar
Benveniste, J.
(2005) Ma vérité sur la mémoire de l’eau. Paris, Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Bernard, C.
(1949) An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. Henry Schuman Inc.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1976) Le champ scientifique [The Scientific Field]. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 2/3, 88–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Méditations pascaliennes. Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
(2001) Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris, Raisons d’agir.Google Scholar
Callon, M., & Law, J.
(1982) On Interests and Their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-Enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12, 1982, 615–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. M.
(1985) Changing order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire. Social Studies of Science, 31 (1) 2001, 71–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T.
(1993) The Golem. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davenas, E., Beauvais, F., Amara, J., Oberba, M., Robinzon, B., Miadonna, M., Tedeschi, A., Pomeranz, B., Fortner, P., Belon, P., Sainte-Laudy, J., Poitevin, B., Benveniste, J.
(1988) Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. Nature, 333, 816–818. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De la Brosse, S.
(1988) Une grande découverte fait la France la base d’une nouvelle aventure scientifique qui assure un avenir fantastique à la recherche. Le Pr Benveniste : “Oui l’eau de la mémoire”. Paris Match, 15 juillet, 58–59.Google Scholar
De Lara, P.
(2014) Droit et coutume : ce que Hart doit à Wittgenstein. Droit & Philosophie, Volume 6, 93–104.Google Scholar
Duhem, P.
(1906) La théorie physique. Son objet, sa structure. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Farley, J., Geison, G. L.
(1974) Science, Politics, and Spontaneous Generation in 19ht Century France: The Pasteur-Pouchet Debate. Bulletin of The History of Medicine, vol.48, 161–198.Google Scholar
Hacking, I
(1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, N. R.
(1961) Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, M.
(1986) Changing concepts and stable order. Social Studies of Science, 16, (4), 714–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. J., & Hayes, N. A., & Burridge, J. et al.
(1993) Human basophil degranulation is not triggered by very dilute antiserum against human IgE, Nature, 366, 525–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S.
(1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B.
(1983) Le dernier des capitalistes sauvages. Interview d’un biochimiste. Fundamenta Scientiae, vol.4, n°3–4, 301–327.Google Scholar
(1987) Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S.
(1979)  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Los Angeles, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lynch, M.
(1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science. A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, D. A.
(1978) Statistical Theory and Social Interests: A Case Study. Social Studies of Science, vol.8, 35–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1982) Statistics in Britain (1865–1930). The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Marcovich, A., & Shinn, T.
(2012) Regimes of Science Production and Diffusion: Towards a Transverse Organization of Knowledge. Scientiæ Studia, v. 10, special issue, 33–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K.
(1942) The Normative Structure of Science. In R. K. Merton, The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Metzger, H., & Dreskin, S. C.
(1988) Only the smile is left. Nature, 334, 375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T.
(1985) Towards an Analysis of Scientific Observation: The Externality and Evidentia Significance of Observational Reports in Physics. Social Studies of Science, vol.15, issue 1, 3–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Confronting Nature: The Sociology of Solar-Neutrino Detection. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A.
(Ed.). (1992) Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago. University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, M.
(1966) The Tacit Dimension, Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ragouet, P.
(2016) L’eau a-t-elle une mémoire ? Sociologie d’une controverse scientifique. Paris, Raisons d’Agir.Google Scholar
Schiff, M.
(1994) Un cas de censure dans la science. L’affaire de la mémoire de l’eau. Paris, Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Shinn, T.
(2000) Formes de division du travail scientifique et convergence intellectuelle. La recherche technico-instrumentale. Revue française de sociologie, 41-3, 447–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, T., & Ragouet, P.
(2005) Controverses sur la science. Pour une sociologie transversaliste de l’activité scientifique. Paris, Raisons d’agir.Google Scholar
Soler, L.
(2011) Les expérimentateurs sont-ils substituables les uns aux autres ? Le Philosophoire, 35, (1), 65–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar