Cover not available
Part of
Controversies and Interdisciplinarity: Beyond disciplinary fragmentation for a new knowledge model
Edited by Jens Allwood, Olga Pombo, Clara Renna and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 16] 2020
► pp. 199–215

Chapter 10
Controversial images

‘Listening to’ the visual, for a new communication ethics

| University of Pisa
Communicating with controversial images may be a device to draw attention to issues that are key to the interest of people and society alike. A device that can raise public awareness, or, instead, anaesthetise it may lead to make responsible or irresponsible choices. It is this ability of images that will be emphasised by communicative events involving controversial images, astride three media revolutions ad imaginem: printing, photography and digital technology. Lastly, emphasis will be placed on the importance of communication ethics in the choice of a “good” controversial image, one that may enable viewers to see it, ‘listen to it’ and understand it and, thus, to act morally.
Keywords: controversial, ethics, image, listening, social, visual communication
Article outline
  • Foreword: The power and limits of controversial images
  • The inter-disciplinary and synesthetic dimensions of visual communication
  • The contro-versial dimension of the visual, and opinion-forming
  • Medial caesurae and controversies from, and in, the visual
  • Conclusions: Listening to images, for a controversial ethics of the visual
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.16.10ner
References (57)
References
Alberti, L. B. (1973). De Pictura. In Id., Opere volgari (vol. III., pp. 5–108). Bari: Laterza. (Original work published 1435).Google Scholar
Amato, P. (2014). In posa. Abu Graib 10 anni dopo. Napoli: Cronopio.Google Scholar
Anders, G. (2007). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution. München: C. H. Beck (Original work published 1956).Google Scholar
Aristotele (2001). Retorica. Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Asselt, P., Geest, D. & Muller T. Salemink (Eds.). (2007). Iconoclasm and Iconoclash. Struggle for Religious Identity. Leiden-Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. (1980). La chambre claire: note sur la photographie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bartoletti, R. & Faccioli, F. (2013). Comunicazione e civic engagement. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J. (1996). Il delitto perfetto. La televisione ha ucciso la realtà?. Milano: Raffello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar
Belting, H. (2005). Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach of Iconology (pp. 302–319). Critical Inquiry, 31, 2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1955). Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. (Original edition 1936).Google Scholar
Bianchi, I. (2008). La politica delle immagini nell’età della controriforma. Bologna: Editrice Compositori.Google Scholar
Boehm, G. (1994). Die Wiederkehr der Bilder. In G. Boehm (Ed.). Was ist ein Bild? (pp. 11–38). München: Fink.Google Scholar
Checchi, G. (2018). L’iconoclastia nelle stampe tedesche del primo Cinquecento. Intrecci d’Arte. 7, 50–71.Google Scholar
Debray, R. (2010). Vita e morte dell’immagine. Milano: Il Castoro. (Original work published 1999).Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, G. (2005). Immagini malgrado tutto. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore. (Original work published 2003).Google Scholar
Ehrlich, R. T. (Ed.). (2000). Excerpts from Civic Responsibility and Higher Education. Phenix: Oryx Press.Google Scholar
Fabris, A. (2018). Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies. New York-Berlin: Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floridi, F. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flusser, V. (2009). Immagini. Come la tecnologia ha cambiato la nostra percezione del mondo. Roma: Fazi editore. (Original work published 1983).Google Scholar
Franzini, E. (2010). Introduzione. In R. Debray. Vita e morte dell’immagine (pp. 13–15). Milano: Il Castoro.Google Scholar
Freedberg, D. (1985). Iconoclasts and Their Motives. Maarsen: Schwartz.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1991). Von der Kunst des Zuhörens. Therapeutische Aspekte der Psychoanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2001). Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica. Roma-Bari: Editori Laterza. (Original work published 1962).Google Scholar
Heinze, E. (2016). Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (2012). Critique of Judgment. New York: Dover Publications Inc. (Original work published 1790).Google Scholar
Kracauer, S. (1982). La fotografia. In Id. La massa come ornamento (pp. 111–127). Napoli: Prismi. (Original work published 1927).Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2002). What is iconoclash? Or is There a World Beyond the Image Wars?. In B. Latour & P. Weibel. Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art (pp. 16–40). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lingua, G. (2006). L’icona, l’idolo e la guerra delle immagini. Milano: Medusa.Google Scholar
Maragliano, R. (2008). Parlare le immagini. Milano: Apogeo.Google Scholar
Marin, L. (2009). L’essere dell’immagine e la sua efficacia. In A. Pinotti & A. Somaini (Eds.). Teorie dell’immagine (pp. 271–286). Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Mirzoeff, N. (2004). Watching Babylon: The War in Iraq and Global Visual Culture. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1992). The Pictorial Turn. Artforum, 30, 7, 89–94.Google Scholar
(2005). The Unspeakable and the Unimaginable: Word and Image in a Time of Terror. ELH, 72, 2, 291–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Cloning Terror. The War of Images. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Mondzain, M. J. (2011). Il commercio degli sguardi. Milano: Edizioni Medusa. (Original work published 2003).Google Scholar
Murner, T. (1522). Von dem grossen lutherischen narren. Strasbourg: Johann Grüninger.Google Scholar
Nancy, J.-L. (2005a). L’immagine: mimesis e methexis. In C.-C. Härle (Ed.). Ai limiti dell’immagine. Macerata: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
(2005b). Image and Violence. In Id., The Ground of the Image (pp. 15–26). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Neri, V. (2013). L’immagine nel web. Etica e ontologia. Carocci: Roma.Google Scholar
Pagnoux, É. (2001). Reporter photographe à Auschwitz. Les temps Modernes, 56, 613, 84–108.Google Scholar
Paleotti, G. (1582). Discorso intorno le imagini sacre et profane diviso in cinque libri. Bologna: Alessandro Benacci.Google Scholar
Perna, R. & Schiaffini, I. (2015). Etica e fotografia: una relazione attuale. In R. Perna & I. Schiaffini (Eds.). Etica e fotografia. Potere, ideologia, violenza dell’immagine fotografica (pp. 5–13). Roma: DeriveApprodi.Google Scholar
Perna, R. and Schiaffini, I. (Eds.). (2015). Etica e fotografia. Potere, ideologia, violenza dell’immagine fotografica. Roma: DeriveApprodi.Google Scholar
Pinotti, A. & Somaini, A. (Eds.). (2009). Teorie dell’immagine. Il dibattito contemporaneo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar
(2016). Cultura visuale. Immagini, sguardi media dispositivi. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Ras, P. (2016). L’art d’écouter. Genève: Jouvence.Google Scholar
Scarafile, G. (2016). Etica delle immagini. Brescia: Morcelliana.Google Scholar
Scavizzi, G. (1981). L’architettura sacra: arte e architettura sacra: cronache e documenti sulla controversia tra riformati e cattolici: 1500–1550. Reggio Calabria – Roma: Casa del Libro.Google Scholar
Società (2003). In Il Vocabolario Treccani (p. 1697). Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. (2004). Sulla fotografia. Realtà e immagine nella nostra società. Torino: Einaudi. (Original work published 1977).Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham-London: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tönnies, F. (2011). Comunità e società. Roma-Bari: Laterza. (Original work published 1887).Google Scholar
Vercellone, F. (2017). Il futuro dell’immagine. Il Mulino: Bologna.Google Scholar
Vis, F. & Goriunova, O. (Eds.). (2015). The iconic image on social media: a rapid research response to the death of Aylan Kurdi. Sheffield: Visual Social Media Lab.Google Scholar
Zelizer, B. (1998). Remembering to Forget. Holocaust Memory through the Camera’s Eye. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2005). America oggi. Abu Ghraib e altre oscenità. Verona: Ombre corte.Google Scholar