A pragma-dialectical analysis of televised town hall meetings following the murder trial of O.J. Simpson: 12. Competing demands, multiple ideals, and the structure of argumentation practices

Weger, Harry; Aakhus, Mark

doi:10.1075/cvs.2.15weg

Part of

Argumentation in Practice
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser
[Controversies 2] 2005
► pp. 181–195

12. Competing demands, multiple ideals, and the structure of argumentation practices

A pragma-dialectical analysis of televised town hall meetings following the murder trial of O.J. Simpson

Harry Weger

Mark Aakhus

Published online: 22 September 2005

https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.2.15weg

Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Order by:

Hornikx, Jos & Ulrike Hahn

2012. Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentation. Thinking & Reasoning 18:3 ► pp. 225 ff.

Jacobs, Scott, Sally Jackson & Xiaoqi Zhang

2022. What Was the President’s Standpoint and When Did He Take It? A Normative Pragmatic Study of Standpoint Emergence in a Presidential Press Conference. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 153 ff.

Oswald, Steve

2023. The Pragmatics and Argumentation Interface. Languages 8:3 ► pp. 210 ff.

Tracy, Karen

2021. Delivering justice. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 27:2 ► pp. 181 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.