A pragma-dialectical analysis of televised town hall meetings following the murder trial of O.J. Simpson: 12. Competing demands, multiple ideals, and the structure of argumentation practices

Weger, Harry; Aakhus, Mark

doi:10.1075/cvs.2.15weg

Part of

Argumentation in Practice
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser
[Controversies 2] 2005
► pp. 181–195

12. Competing demands, multiple ideals, and the structure of argumentation practices

A pragma-dialectical analysis of televised town hall meetings following the murder trial of O.J. Simpson

Harry Weger

Mark Aakhus

Published online: 22 September 2005

https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.2.15weg

Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Hornikx, Jos & Ulrike Hahn

2012. Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentation. Thinking & Reasoning 18:3 ► pp. 225 ff.

Jacobs, Scott, Sally Jackson & Xiaoqi Zhang

2022. What Was the President’s Standpoint and When Did He Take It? A Normative Pragmatic Study of Standpoint Emergence in a Presidential Press Conference. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 153 ff.

Tracy, Karen

2021. Delivering justice. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 27:2 ► pp. 181 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.