The Rhetoric of Philosophy
Author
The book claims that philosophy can be defined by its distinct rhetoric. This rhetoric is shaped by two values: humanism and critique. Humanism is defined as preferring the individual human deliberation to any external authority or method. Self-conviction is the touchstone of truth in philosophy. Critique is defined as suspecting your beliefs and convictions. This is the reason why the book uses Nietzsche’s definition of "the will to truth" – "the will not to deceive, not even myself" – for explaining the nature of philosophical thinking and argumentation. This rhetorical analysis reveals that the danger of self-deception is a constitutive yet irresolvable problem of philosophy.
The subjects of the book are: the relations between philosophy and rhetoric, the speaker and the addressee of philosophical arguments, the subordination of logic to rhetoric in philosophy and the philosophical problem of self-deception.
This work, unburdened with philosophers’ jargon, fits well in the current critical debate about the relevance of pragmatic features of the concepts of subjectivity and truth.
[Controversies, 3] 2005. x, 156 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgment
-
Introduction | pp. 1–9
-
1. Rhetoric and philosophy | pp. 11–42
-
2. Speaker and addressee in philosophy | pp. 43–81
-
3. Philosophical argumentation: Logic and rhetoric | pp. 83–107
-
4. Humanism, critique and the rhetoric of philosophy | pp. 109–126
-
Notes | pp. 127–145
-
-
Index | pp. 153–156
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Frogel, Shai
Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Philosophy
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General