Traditions of Controversy
Editors
Controversies may be particularly prominent in one or another culture. Yet, there is hardly any culture where they do not exist. This book assumes that the practice of controversy, along with its theorization, constitutes – in each of the cultures and disciplines where it develops – a tradition. Whether there are enough shared elements in these traditions to consider them as, fundamentally, universal or not is something that can only be determined on the basis of a rich sample of controversies and theorizations thereof belonging to different traditions. This is what this volume provides to the reader. By presenting side by side controversies from the East and from the West, from the ancient past up to the present, from different domains of scholarship and action, the reader is in a position not only to admire the widespread nature, role, and richness of the phenomenon, but also to begin to evaluate its variety as well as universality. While the editors have purposefully avoided comparative studies of traditions of controversy, in order to focus on each tradition so to speak from its practitioners’ point of view, some of the chapters take a bird’s eye view and exemplify how such studies can be systematically conducted. In a world that is globalizing itself at a fast pace, the awareness of the multiplicity of traditions of controversy is fundamental for ensuring both that the integration of the various perspectives is harmonious and that each one of them is granted its place in a plural universe.
[Controversies, 4] 2007. xvi, 310 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Crossing borderlines: Traditions, disciplines, and controversiesMarcelo Dascal and Han-liang Chang | pp. ix–xvi
-
Part I. Ancient traditions: East and West
-
Towards a taxonomy of controversies and controversiality: Ancient Greece and ChinaGeoffrey Lloyd | pp. 3–15
-
Controversy in Jewish law: The Talmud's attitude to controversyHanina Ben Menahem | pp. 17–62
-
Debates and rhetoric in SumerSimonetta Ponchia | pp. 63–83
-
Persuasion in the Pre-Qin China: The Great Debate revisitedHan-liang Chang | pp. 85–100
-
'In proper form': Xunzi's theory of xingerPeng Yi | pp. 101–123
-
The right, duty and pleasure of debating in Western cultureAdelino Cattani | pp. 125–138
-
Part II. Medieval and Early Modern traditions: Logic, dialectic, and rhetoric in controversy
-
The medieval disputatioOlga Weijers | pp. 141–149
-
Disputing about disputing: The medieval procedure of positio and its role in a dispute over the nature of logic and the foundations of metaphysicsChristopher J. Martin | pp. 151–164
-
Antibarabarous contra pseudophilosophers: Metaphors in an early modern controversyCristina Marras | pp. 165–179
-
Dialectics, topology and practical philosophy in early modern timesMerio Scattola | pp. 181–206
-
Part III. Modern traditions: The rise of scientific disciplines
-
Legal controversy vs. scientific and philosophical controversiesJoão Lopes Alves | pp. 209–222
-
The controversy over the foundation of sociology and its object: Simmel's form versus Durkheim's collectivityAmos Morris-Reich | pp. 223–247
-
Controversies about politenessChaoqun Xie | pp. 249–266
-
Controversies over controversies: An ontological perspective on the place of controversy in current historiographyOfer Gal | pp. 267–279
-
Traditions of controversy and conflict resolution: Can past approaches help to solve present conflicts?Marcelo Dascal | pp. 281–295
-
About the contributors | pp. 297–300
-
Index | pp. 301–309
“By presenting side by side controversies from the East and from the West, from anxient to the modern traditions, from different fields and disciplines, Traditions and Controversy not only introduces the richness of the phenomenon, but also opens one's eyes to the complicated relativity and universality therein.”
I-wen Su, National Taiwan University, in Pragmatics & Cognition, Vol. 17:2 (2009)
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Allwood, Jens, Olga Pombo & Giovanni Scarafile
2020. Introduction. Crossing borderlines. In Controversies and Interdisciplinarity [Controversies, 16], ► pp. 1 ff.
Bondi, Marina
2018. Dialogicity in written language use. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 137 ff.
Fritz, Gerd
2018. Chapter 1. The pragmatic organization of controversies. In Historical Pragmatics of Controversies [Controversies, 14], ► pp. 1 ff.
Pouwels, Jan & Gert Biesta
Fabris, Adriano
Jackiewicz, Agata, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Philosophy
Main BIC Subject
CFK: Grammar, syntax
Main BISAC Subject
LAN015000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric