2024. The Effect of Empathic Mediation in Conflict Resolution. In Accessing the Public Sphere, ► pp. 113 ff.
FUCHS‐GALLEZOT, Magali & Corinne FORTIN
2024. The Current “Synthesis versus Extended Theory of Evolution” Controversy. In The Evolution of Life: Teaching, Learning and Training, ► pp. 117 ff.
Foderaro, Antonella & David Gunnarsson Lorentzen
2023. Argumentative practices and patterns in debating climate change on Twitter. Aslib Journal of Information Management 75:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Almeida Rodrigues Lima, Cecília
2021. Telenovela e controvérsias. Tríade: Comunicação, Cultura e Mídia 9:21 ► pp. 168 ff.
Amossy, Ruth
2021. Public Controversy and Polemics: Some Attempts at Definitions. In In Defense of Polemics [Argumentation Library, 42], ► pp. 27 ff.
Amossy, Ruth
2021. Managing Disagreement in Democracies: Towards a Rhetoric of Dissensus. In In Defense of Polemics [Argumentation Library, 42], ► pp. 9 ff.
2019. Arguing Along Fault-lines: A Rhetorical Analysis of Public Divides over Wildlife Comeback. Conservation and Society 17:4 ► pp. 343 ff.
David, Joseph E.
2017. DIVINITY, LAW, AND THE LEGAL TURN IN THE STUDY OF RELIGIONS. Journal of Law and Religion 32:1 ► pp. 172 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser
2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis. Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
2012. Is There a Controversy Concerning the Morality of the Occupation and Its Implications?1. In The Impacts of Lasting Occupation, ► pp. 61 ff.
Dascal, Marcelo
2014. Dialogue of Rationalities: A Case Study. In Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 3], ► pp. 219 ff.
Spranzi, Marta
2012. The Nature and Purpose of Aristotelian Dialectic Revisited: Argumentation Theory, Scientific Controversies and Epistemology. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 163 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.