Part of
Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theoryEdited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies 6] 2008
► pp. 27–49
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies 6] 2008
► pp. 27–49
Dichotomies and types of debate
Cited by
Cited by 28 other publications
Abrantes, Paulo C.
2020. Chapter 7. Human evolution. In Controversies and Interdisciplinarity [Controversies, 16], ► pp. 133 ff. 
Almeida Rodrigues Lima, Cecília
2021. Telenovela e controvérsias. Tríade: Comunicação, Cultura e Mídia 9:21 ► pp. 168 ff.
Amossy, Ruth
2021. Public Controversy and Polemics: Some Attempts at Definitions. In In Defense of Polemics [Argumentation Library, 42], ► pp. 27 ff.
Amossy, Ruth
2021. Managing Disagreement in Democracies: Towards a Rhetoric of Dissensus. In In Defense of Polemics [Argumentation Library, 42], ► pp. 9 ff.
Dascal, Marcelo
2012. Is There a Controversy Concerning the Morality of the Occupation and Its Implications?1. In The Impacts of Lasting Occupation, ► pp. 61 ff.
Dascal, Marcelo
2014. Dialogue of Rationalities: A Case Study. In Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 3], ► pp. 219 ff.
David, Joseph E.
2017. DIVINITY, LAW, AND THE LEGAL TURN IN THE STUDY OF RELIGIONS. Journal of Law and Religion 32:1 ► pp. 172 ff.
Foderaro, Antonella & David Gunnarsson Lorentzen
2023. Argumentative practices and patterns in debating climate change on Twitter. Aslib Journal of Information Management 75:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Greco, Roberto
2020. Chapter 11. The role and the impact of interdisciplinarity on the relational models of intervention in the doctor-patient communication. In Controversies and Interdisciplinarity [Controversies, 16], ► pp. 217 ff.
Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia
2021. Discussion, dispute or controversy?. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser
2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis. Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2015. Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 151 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2016. Shale gas debate in Europe: Pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues. Discourse & Communication 10:6 ► pp. 553 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin & Mark Aakhus
2014. Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 28:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Lorentzen, David Gunnarsson
2020. Bridging polarised Twitter discussions: the interactions of the users in the middle. Aslib Journal of Information Management 73:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
Malloy, Jacquelynn A., Kelly N. Tracy, Roya Q. Scales, Kristin Menickelli & W. David Scales
2020. It’s Not About Being Right: Developing Argument Through Debate. Journal of Literacy Research 52:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Sariel, Aviram
Scarafile, Giovanni
Shoham, Kuti
2019. Chapter 2. Locke’s and Leibniz’s virtual debate over Of our knowledge of the existence of God. In Controversies in the Contemporary World [Controversies, 15], ► pp. 29 ff.
Spranzi, Marta
2012. The Nature and Purpose of Aristotelian Dialectic Revisited: Argumentation Theory, Scientific Controversies and Epistemology. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 163 ff.
Uzelgun, Mehmet ali, Marcin Lewiński & Paula Castro
2016. Favorite Battlegrounds of Climate Action. Science Communication 38:6 ► pp. 699 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff.
Van Herzele, Ann & Noelle Aarts
2019. Arguing Along Fault-lines: A Rhetorical Analysis of Public Divides over Wildlife Comeback. Conservation and Society 17:4 ► pp. 343 ff.
Van Herzele, Ann, Noelle Aarts & Jim Casaer
2015. Wildlife comeback in Flanders: tracing the fault lines and dynamics of public debate. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61:4 ► pp. 539 ff.
van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2013. The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance. Argumentation 27:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C.W. Krabbe
2016. Fair and unfair strategies in public controversies. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.