Pragmatic inconsistency and credibility

van Laar, Jan Albert

doi:10.1075/cvs.6.11laa

Part of

Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies 6] 2008
► pp. 163–179

Pragmatic inconsistency and credibility

Jan Albert van Laar

Published online: 17 December 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.6.11laa

Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Distinguishing Between Different Kinds of Argumentative Practices. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 129 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2013. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2014. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 517 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.