Empirically researching the European Convention: Deliberation or ‘mainstreaming’?

Oberhuber, Florian

doi:10.1075/dapsac.13.12obe

Part of

A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity
Edited by Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 13] 2005
► pp. 165–187

Deliberation or ‘mainstreaming’?

Empirically researching the European Convention

Florian Oberhuber | University of Vienna

Published online: 28 July 2005

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.13.12obe

Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Order by:

Calzada-Pérez, María

2017. Researching the European Parliament with Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 465 ff.

Just, Sine Nørholm

2007. DELIBERATIVE PROCESSES AND BARGAINED POSITIONS: THE PUBLIC (RE-)PRESENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION. Critical Discourse Studies 4:3 ► pp. 257 ff.

Oberhuber, Florian, Christoph Bärenreuter, Michal Krzyżanowski, Heinz Schönbauer & Ruth Wodak

2005. Debating the European Constitution. Journal of Language and Politics 4:2 ► pp. 227 ff.

Wodak, Ruth

2022. Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 426 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.