What We Remember

The construction of memory in military discourse

| Carnegie Mellon University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027206176 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027289957 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
This interdisciplinary monograph explores the discursive manifestations of the conflict over how to remember and interpret the actions of the military during the last dictatorship in Uruguay (1973-1985). Through the exploration of the discursive ways in which this powerful group represents past events and participants, we can trace the ideological struggle over how to reconstruct a traumatic past. By looking at memory as a social and discursive practice, the analysis identifies particular semiotic practices and linguistic patterns deployed in the construction of memory. The discursive description of what is remembered, how it is remembered, and who remembers serves to explain how the institution’s construction of the past is transformed and maintained to respond to outside criticism and create an institutional identity as a lawful state apparatus. This book should interest discourse analysts, historians, sociologists and researchers in the field of transitional justice.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
ix–x
Introduction
1–5
Chapter 1. The construction of memory
7–22
Chapter 2. Constructing memory through discursive practices
23–37
Chapter 3. The construction of accounts of the dictatorship period (1976 & 1978)
39–75
Chapter 4. Analysis of editorials of a military magazine, El Soldado (1986-1996)
77–101
Chapter 5. Individual memory: Analysis of the confession of a repressor
103–123
Chapter 6. Struggles for memory: Dialogue between social actors (2000-2001)
125–166
Chapter 7. What is our story: Reconstructing the institutional grand narrative (2007)
167–194
Chapter 8. Conclusions
195–207
References
209–222
Corpus of texts analyzed
223–224
Appendix
225–229
Appendix 2
231–241
Author index
243
Subject index
245–246
“Some memories fade away; other stick around, haunting future generations. What we Remember addresses the struggles over amnesty, responsibility and reconciliation in relation to Uruguayan military discourse. Achugar's readings provide an engaging account of these struggles, skillfully demonstrating in the process how CDA and SFL analysis inform one another. Writing as the daughter of exiled Uruguayan leftists, she provides an illuminating, and potentially exorcising exploration of a dictatorship whose legacy has far from gone away.”
“This book is thought-provoking for people interested in the study of memory recollection, and/or the study of discursive practices. Both issues are thoroughly covered - and connected - in the book. This is the key positive aspect of this book, where we get some insight into the process of memory construction, and its discursive connection with the context in which discursive practices are produced and the common knowledge shared by social actors involved in them. [...] The book's organisation is worth praising. The diachronic study that is presented in the analysis is not only useful in order to understand recent Uruguayan history - and its discursive representation - but also to get a grasp of discursive change throughout time . [...] This book is not only an interesting reading because of what it offers and the knowledge we get from it, but also because of the new lines of research it opens up. The connection between discourse and memory, the importance of the context in which they are produced, and the people to whom those recollections about the past are addressed offers the possibility of creating a taxonomy of types of memory which can be classified by taking the variables considered in the analysis in this book, i.e. genre, situational context and addressees.”
“This book by Dr. Mariana Achugar is a unique contribution to historical and ideological discourse studies. First of all because military discourse is hardly ever analyzed in our field, despite the fact that the military not only fight and kill, but also talk, especially when they want to obfuscate or legitimate their abuses. Secondly, her work is important because of the study of the triple interface between discourse, social cognition (memory and forgetting) and politics of the nation state. Thirdly, Dr. Achugar is relevant for discourse studies more generally because of her systematic analysis of argumentation strategies, actor representation and other properties of text and talk. And finally, and perhaps most dramatically, this book offers a linguistic portrait of some of the main actors of the darkest episodes of recent Latin American history: the military dictatorships of the 20th century.”
“The discourse on the past is a discourse that is under continuous construction and, therefore, cannot be seen as a closed discourse. In countries with totalitarian pasts, a part of the rehabilitation claims raised by the victims have not yet been met. Therefore, it is important that in this book Mariane Achugar has contributed to the analysis of the manipulations of the past.”
“Achugar's project makes a fine contribution to the series and will engage all who are interested in the discursive dimensions of memory construction, the theory and application of systemic functional linguistic (SFL) and critical discourse analysis (CDA), military discourse, and the specific case of the Uruguayan dictatorship's human rights abuses. [...] Achugar provides an engaged yet dispassionate account of how the sociocultural memory of Uruguay's difficult past was discursively produced, contested, and transformed. Her work seeks not to render a partisan judgment about the military's actions but to expose the logic underlying those actions. In this way, her work will prove immensely valuable to scholars seeking to understand, and intervene in, the discursive aspects of social and political struggles.”
“This monograph stands as a testament to the important role of discourse analysis in the realm of history and in particular with respect to contested histories and the historical progression of memory. Achugar’s work is a noteworthy contribution to the field of critical discourse analysis in which linguistic analysis serves to make claims in the social realm. It is a disciplined study, chock-full of pertinent pieces of a nation’s history and its continual struggle to make sense of the voices of the past within the present.”
Cited by

Cited by 30 other publications

No author info given
2013.  In Framing Languages and Literacies,  pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2015.  In Israeli Peace Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 59], Crossref logo
No author info given
2017.  In The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics,  pp. 481 ff. Crossref logo
Achugar, Mariana
2009. Constructing the past and constructing themselves: the Uruguayan military's memory of the dictatorship. Critical Discourse Studies 6:4  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Bietti, Lucas M.
2011. The commemoration of March 24th, 1976. Journal of Language and Politics 10:3  pp. 347 ff. Crossref logo
Duncan, Philip T.
2014. REMEMBERING THE FUTURE. Critical Discourse Studies 11:4  pp. 416 ff. Crossref logo
Dunmire, Patricia L.
2012. Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. Language and Linguistics Compass 6:11  pp. 735 ff. Crossref logo
Esposito, Eleonora, Carolina Pérez-Arredondo & José Manuel Ferreiro
2019.  In Discourses from Latin America and the Caribbean,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Filardo-Llamas, Laura
2014.  In From Text to Political Positions [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 55],  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Flowerdew, John
2016. A historiographical approach to Hong Kong Occupy. Journal of Language and Politics 15:5  pp. 527 ff. Crossref logo
Flowerdew, John
2017. Understanding the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement: A critical discourse historiographical approach. Discourse & Society 28:5  pp. 453 ff. Crossref logo
Flowerdew, John & John E. Richardson
2017.  In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gavins, Joanna
2009. The year’s work in stylistics 2008. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 18:4  pp. 367 ff. Crossref logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2014. Collective memory as a metaphor: The case of speeches by Israeli prime ministers 2001–2009. Memory Studies 7:1  pp. 46 ff. Crossref logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia & Einat Lachover
2012. Reframing the Past as a Cosmopolitan Memory: Obituaries in the Israeli Daily Haaretz. Communication Theory 22:1  pp. 48 ff. Crossref logo
Gjevori, Elvin
2018.  In Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania,  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
McIntosh, Janet
2021. Language and the Military: Necropolitical Legitimation, Embodied Semiotics, and Ineffable Suffering. Annual Review of Anthropology 50:1  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
Pascual, Mariana
2014. La asociación de recursos de valoración: el caso de las organizaciones de derechos humanos en la prensa escrita argentina. Onomázein Revista de lingüística, filología y traducción :ALSFAL  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
Perez, Carolina
2018. Achugar, Mariana. 2016. Discursive processes of intergenerational transmission of recent history: (Re)making our past . Journal of Language and Politics 17:5  pp. 696 ff. Crossref logo
Prendergast, Muireann
2020. Witnessing in the echo chamber: From counter-discourses in print media to counter-memories of Argentina’s state terrorism. Memory Studies 13:6  pp. 1036 ff. Crossref logo
RONIGER, LUIS
2011. Transitional Justice and Protracted Accountability in Re-democratised Uruguay, 1985–2011. Journal of Latin American Studies 43:4  pp. 693 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz, Marcela & Oriana Bernasconi
2019. Reports on categorization and classification of human rights violations in Chile (1974–1978). Discourse & Society 30:1  pp. 44 ff. Crossref logo
Simmons, Amber M. & Ruth Harman
2013. Anthropologies of education: a global guide to ethnographic studies of learning and schooling, by Luciana C. de Oliveira, Charlotte, NC, Information Age, 2011, xviii + 152 pp., US$45.99 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-61735-336-9. Pedagogies: An International Journal 8:2  pp. 194 ff. Crossref logo
Taboada, Maite, Marta Carretero & Jennifer Hinnell
2014. Loving and hating the movies in English, German and Spanish. Languages in Contrast 14:1  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Taboada, Maite, Marta Carretero & Jennifer Hinnell
2016.  In Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast [Benjamins Current Topics, 87],  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Van de Putte, Thomas
2021. “Let me tell you what we already know”: Collective memory between culture and interaction. Memory Studies  pp. 175069802110447 ff. Crossref logo
van Roekel, Eva
2018.  In Time and Temporality in Transitional and Post-Conflict Societies,  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo
Waugh, Linda R., Theresa Catalano, Khaled Al Masaeed, Tom Hong Do & Paul G. Renigar
2016.  In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4],  pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Wodak, Ruth & John E. Richardson
2009. On the politics of remembering (or not). Critical Discourse Studies 6:4  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Šarić, Ljiljana
2021. Review of Putz (2019): Metaphor and National Identity. Alternative Conceptualization of the Treaty of Trianon. Metaphor and the Social World 11:1  pp. 184 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata

Communication Studies

Communication Studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2008028908 | Marc record