Separate and Unequal

Judicial rhetoric and women's rights

Author

Huang Hoon Chng | National University of Singapore

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027226938 (Eur) | EUR 99.00

ISBN 9781588112149 (USA) | USD 149.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027297686 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00

This book argues for a multidisciplinary approach to the study of the language of judges with respect to the issue of gender discrimination. Drawing its inspiration from Dell Hymes' socially constituted linguistics, the author examines the language of the judicial opinions of four U.S. Supreme Court cases addressing social and legal discrimination against women. Through a linguistic analysis that is informed by a Foucauldian and feminist perspective, this book addresses the complex issues of the power of judges and ideologies, the politics of language use, and feminist contributions to the subject of discrimination and women's rights. This book is most suitable for researchers and students in cultural studies, ethnography, feminist legal studies, forensic linguistics, gender studies, ideology research, pragmatics, semiotics, and social studies.

[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 3] 2002. viii, 156 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.3

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements | pp. vii–viii

1. From past to present: Building on the foundation of ideas | pp. 1–21

2. Towards multidisciplinarity: Gendered discourse, judicial ideologies and the power of law | pp. 23–37

3. Unequal by law: The early years | pp. 39–78

4. Women are persons after all: The rights of Sally Reed and Jane Roe | pp. 79–100

5. Of equality and justice: Language, gender, and legal ideology in the American context | pp. 101–130

Notes | pp. 131–134

List of cases analyzed and cited | p. 143

Appendix I | p. 145

Appendix II | pp. 146–152

Index | pp. 153–156

“This book brings together many issues that are situated at the crossroads of discourse, gender discrimination, law, and ideology. Working from the perspective of discourse analysis and gender studies, this work argues for and demonstrates the importance of multidisciplinarity in contemporary scholarship when addressing issues as complex as womens rights, judicial discourse and power.”

Prof Joel Sherzer, UT-Austin

“This book will undoubtedly fill a gap in discursive studies since it tries, in its multidisciplinary approach to address critically issues concerning judicial discourse, gender discrimination, power, the law and the interconnections between them.”

Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Jensen, Courtney

2020. Fundraising, race, and discourse: The challenges and opportunities' of social construction. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 25:3

Sibanda, Jabulani & Martin P. Begede

2015. University Students’ Preferences for Gender Specific and Gender Neutral Occupational Terms and Gender Neutral Singular Pronouns: A Case Study. Journal of Social Sciences 42:1-2 ► pp. 11 ff.

Soboleva, Anita

2013. Use and Misuse of Language in Judicial Decision-Making: Russian Experience. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 26:3 ► pp. 673 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects