Strategic manoeuvring in an institutional context: Ad-hominem arguments in the Dutch and the European Parliaments

Plug, H. José

doi:10.1075/dapsac.38.15plu

Part of

European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices
Edited by Cornelia Ilie
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 38] 2010
► pp. 305–328

Ad-hominem arguments in the Dutch and the European Parliaments

Strategic manoeuvring in an institutional context

H. José Plug

Published online: 29 July 2010

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38.15plu

Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Order by:

Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena

2020. Parliamentary impoliteness and the interpreter’s gender. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:4 ► pp. 459 ff.

Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena

2023. Can you amuse the audience through an interpreter?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies

Gruber, Helmut

2015. Intertextual references in Austrian parliamentary debates. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60], ► pp. 25 ff.

Gruber, Helmut

2015. Policy-oriented argumentation or ironic evaluation: A study of verbal quoting and positioning in Austrian politicians’ parliamentary debate contributions. Discourse Studies 17:6 ► pp. 682 ff.

van Haaften, Ton

2017. Chapter 11. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Dutch parliamentary debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 177 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.