Strategic manoeuvring in an institutional context: Ad-hominem arguments in the Dutch and the European Parliaments

Plug, H. José

doi:10.1075/dapsac.38.15plu

Part of

European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices
Edited by Cornelia Ilie
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 38] 2010
► pp. 305–328

Ad-hominem arguments in the Dutch and the European Parliaments

Strategic manoeuvring in an institutional context

H. José Plug

Published online: 29 July 2010

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38.15plu

Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Order by:

Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena

2020. Parliamentary impoliteness and the interpreter’s gender. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:4 ► pp. 459 ff.

Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena

2024. Can you amuse the audience through an interpreter?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 36:1 ► pp. 26 ff.

Franceschi, Valeria

2024. Disalignment in the EU. Journal of Language and Politics 23:2 ► pp. 219 ff.

Gruber, Helmut

2015. Intertextual references in Austrian parliamentary debates. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60], ► pp. 25 ff.

Gruber, Helmut

2015. Policy-oriented argumentation or ironic evaluation: A study of verbal quoting and positioning in Austrian politicians’ parliamentary debate contributions. Discourse Studies 17:6 ► pp. 682 ff.

van Haaften, Ton

2017. Chapter 11. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Dutch parliamentary debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 177 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.