Part of
European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practicesEdited by Cornelia Ilie
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 38] 2010
► pp. 305–328
Edited by Cornelia Ilie
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 38] 2010
► pp. 305–328
Ad-hominem arguments in the Dutch and the European Parliaments
Strategic manoeuvring in an institutional context
Cited by (6)
Cited by 6 other publications
Franceschi, Valeria
Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
2020. Parliamentary impoliteness and the interpreter’s gender. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:4 ► pp. 459 ff. 
Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
2024. Can you amuse the audience through an interpreter?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 36:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
van Haaften, Ton
2017. Chapter 11. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Dutch parliamentary debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 177 ff.
Gruber, Helmut
2015. Intertextual references in Austrian parliamentary debates. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60], ► pp. 25 ff.
Gruber, Helmut
2015. Policy-oriented argumentation or ironic evaluation: A study of verbal quoting and positioning in Austrian politicians’ parliamentary debate contributions. Discourse Studies 17:6 ► pp. 682 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.