Article published in:From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 275–296
From Text to the Construction of Political Party Landscapes
A Hybrid Methodology Developed for Voting Advice Applications
This chapter describes a new, hybrid methodology to measure and code party positions on salient political issues. This new method combines expert-judgements based on text analysis with self-placement of parties. The resultant reliable party positions can be used to construct online applications that help voters to decide which party is closest to their own political preferences. The chapter presents the methodology used to identify salient issues and to frame these issues into statements to which users of the online tools are asked to respond. Furthermore, consideration is given to how relevant party documentation is identified and how these textual sources are used to calibrate political parties on the issues. Finally, the chapter discusses the methodological problems of aggregating voters’ opinions into an easy-to-understand output.
Published online: 07 May 2014
Aarts, K. and H. van der Kolk
2003 Partijen zonder mening winnen op Stemwijzer.nl. In Politiekdigitaal (internet) http://www.politiek-digitaal.nl/nieuwedemocratie/partijen_zonder_mening_winnen_op_stemwijzer.nl
Arian, A., A. Krouwel, M. Pol and R. Ventura
Benoit, K. and M. Laver
Berg, H. van den, M. Mehciz, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra and B. Holleman
Budge, I., D. Robertson and D. Hearl
Carlson, T. and K. Strandberg
Dalton, R and M. Wattenberg
Deschouwer, K. and M. Nuytemans
Evans, G., A.F. Heath, and M.G. Lalljee
Kleinnijenhuis, J. and A.P.M. Krouwel
2007 The nature and influence of party profiling websites. Presented at Politicologenetmaal 2007, Antwerp.
Klingemann, H., A. Volkens, J. Bara, I. Budge and M. MacDonald
Klingemann, H., R.I. Hofferbert and I. Budge
Krouwel, A. and S. Fiers
2008 From text to position. Text-extraction and authorisation of party positions along dimensions of political competition. Paper presented at: Voting Advice Applications between Charlatanism and Political Science, Antwerp.
Krouwel, A., Vitiello, T. and M. Wall
Ladner, A., J. Fivaz, P. Joelle
2010 Impact of voting advice applications on voters’ decision-making. Presented at Internet, Politics, Policy 2010: An Impact Assessment. Oxford Internet Institute (OII), University of Oxford.
Laver, M. and J. Garry
Marks, G., L. Hooghe., M. Nelson and E. Edwards
Marks, G., L. Hooghe, M.R. Steenbergen, and R. Bakker
Marschall, S. and C.K. Schmidt
Praag, P. van
Ruusuvirta, O. and M. Rosema
2009 Do online vote selectors influence electoral participation and the direction of the vote? Paper presented at European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference, Potsdam.
Revilla, M, W. Saris and J. Krosnick, J.
2009 Choosing the number of caterogies in agree-disagree scales. RECSM Working Paper Number 5, Universitat Pompeu Fabra - Research and Expertise Centre for Survey Methodology, Barcelona.
Thomassen, J., K. Aarts and H. van der Kolk
Trechsel, A. and P. Mair
Wagner M. and O. Ruusuvirta
Walgrave, S., M. Nuytemans and K. Pepermans
Walgrave, S., P. van Aelst and M. Nuytemans
Wall M., A. Krouwel and T. Vitiello
Wall, M., A. Krouwel and J. Kleinnijenhuis
2011 Comparing voters and parties online. The effects of multi-attribute utility decision rule section in vote advice applications. Paper presented at PoliticologenEtmaal, June 9-10, 2011, University of Amsterdam.
Cited by other publications
Reiljan, Andres, Yordan Kutiyski & André Krouwel
Thomeczek, Jan Philipp, Michael Jankowski & André Krouwel
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.