Cover not available
Part of
From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 297–324

From Text to Political Positions

The Convergence of Political, Linguistic and Discourse Analysis

 | VU University Amsterdam
 | VU University Amsterdam
 | VU University Amsterdam
This chapter explores how three methods of political text analysis can complement each other to differentiate parties in detail. A word-frequency method and corpus linguistic techniques are joined by critical discourse analysis in an attempt to assess the ideological relation between election manifestos and a coalition agreement. How does this agreement relate to the policy positions presented in individual election manifestos and whose issues appear on the governmental agenda? The chapter discusses the design of three levels of text analysis applying text-as-data analysis; words-as-meaningful-data involving lexical-semantic analysis of subjectivity applying Wordscores; and words-in-context analysis for variation in constructions of worldviews. A comparison of the results reveals (im-)possibilities of combining qualitative with quantitative methods. We found that better results can be achieved for party positioning in combinations of qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Published online: 7 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.55.14elf
References (34)
References
Aarts, K. and J. Thomassen. 2008. Dutch voters and the changing party space 1989-2006. Acta Politica 43, pp. 203–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alpino Parser. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. [URL] (accessed 18 June 2012)
Beigman Klebanov, B., D. Diermeier, and E. Beigman. 2008. Automatic annotation of semantic fields for political science research. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 5, pp. 95–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benoit, K. and M. Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Budge, I. 1994. A new spatial theory of party competition. British Journal of Political Science 24, pp. 443–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2005. Vectors, viewpoints and viewpoint shift: Toward a discourse of space theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3, pp. 78–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. 2008. The application of conceptual metaphor theory to political discourse: Methodological questions and some possible solutions. In T. Carver and J. Pikalo (Eds), Political Language and Metaphor. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 241–256.Google Scholar
Cienki, A., B. Kaal and I. Maks. 2010. Mapping world view in political texts using Discourse Space Theory: Metaphor as an analytical tool. Presented at the eighth meeting of the Association for Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM 8), Amsterdam. [URL]
Entman, R.M. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43, pp. 51–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady. J.E. 1997. Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Haeseryn, W., K. Romijn, G. Geerts, J. de Rooij and M. van den Toorn. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff/Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar
Herman, D. (ed.). 2003. Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Heywood, A. 2007. Political Ideologies(4th ed.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L, R. Bakker, A. Brigevich, C. de Vries, E. Edwards, G. Marks, J. Rovny and M. Steenbergen­. 2010. Reliability and validity of measuring party positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006, European Journal of Political Research 4, pp. 684–703.Google Scholar
Kaal, B. 2012. Worldviews: Spatial ground for political reasoning in Dutch election manifestos. CADAAD6 (1), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Kaal, B. and I. Maks. 2011. Stylistics in context: Semantic and discursive aspects of subjectivity in political texts. Paper presented at Stylistics Across Disciplines, Leiden, 16-17 June 2011.
Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier and T. Frey. 2006 Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research 45, pp. 921–956. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamond, I. 2012. Elections as points of discursive contestation: Using a critical approach to discourse as a source for empirical data for cultural policy studies. CADAAD 5(2), pp. 39–53.Google Scholar
Laver, M. 2001. Position and salience in the policies of political actors. In Laver, M (ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. New York: Routledge, pp. 66–75.Google Scholar
Laver, M., K. Benoit and J. Garry. 2003. Extracting policy positions from political texts Using Words as Data. American Political Science Review 97, pp. 311–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laver, M. and J. Garry. 2000. Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science 44, pp. 619–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.C. 1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel and M.F. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–169.Google Scholar
. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marks, G., L. Hooghe, M. Nelson and E. Edwards. 2006. Party competition and European integration in the East and West, Comparative Political Studies 39, pp. 155–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, W.C. and K. Strøm (eds). 2000. Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nuyts, J., P. Byloo and J. Diepeveen. 2010. On deontic modality, directivity and mood: The case of Dutch mogen and moeten . Journal of Pragmatics 42, pp. 16–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson P., and R. Garside. 2000. Comparing Corpora using Frequency Profiling. Proceedings of the workshop on Comparing Corpora, held in conjunction with the 38th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2000), pp. 1–6.
Palmer, F.R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. and D. Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A. 2004. Discourse, knowledge and ideology: Reformulating old questions and proposing some new solutions. In M. Pütz, J. Neff-van Aertselaer and T.A. van Dijk (eds.), Communicating Ideologies: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language, Discourse, and Social Practice. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 5–38.Google Scholar
Warwick, P.V. 1996. Coalition government membership in West European parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science 26, pp. 471–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kovář, Jan
2019. Variations of metaphors in party manifestos about EU finality. In Variation in political metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Kovář, Jan
2020. Czech party positions on the EU’s finality: a conceptual metaphor approach. Journal of International Relations and Development 23:2 ► pp. 462 ff. DOI logo
Kaal, Bertie
2015. HOW ‘REAL’ ARE TIME AND SPACE IN POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WORLDVIEWS?. Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 330 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.