Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Bull, Peter
2015.  In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60],  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Gruber, Helmut
2015. Policy-oriented argumentation or ironic evaluation: A study of verbal quoting and positioning in Austrian politicians’ parliamentary debate contributions. Discourse Studies 17:6  pp. 682 ff. Crossref logo
Gruber, Helmut
2018. Debating or displaying political positions?. Pragmatics and Society 9:4  pp. 571 ff. Crossref logo
Gruber, Helmut
2019. Staged conflicts in Austrian parliamentary debates. Language and Dialogue 9:1  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Johansson, Marjut
2015.  In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60],  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Mikalayeva, Liudmila
2015.  In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60],  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Sauer, Christoph
2015.  In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60],  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Shibata, Masaki
2020. Why do politicians cite others in political debates?. Journal of Language and Politics 19:4  pp. 604 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.



Antaki, Charles and Ivan Leudar
2001“Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents’ Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation. Text, 21(4): 467–488.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Edited by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin/Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul
2004 “Introduction: The Whys and Wherefores of Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 1–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
1994 “Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions.” In Genre and the New Rhetoric, ed. by Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway, 79–105. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin
2004Zwischen Monolog und Dialog. Zur Theorie, Typologie und Geschichte des Zwischenrufes im deutschen Parlamentarismus. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven and John Heritage
2002The News Interview : Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, Colin
2008Postdemokratie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1992 “Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 470–521. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Göran
2011 “Follow-Up Questions in Political Press Conferences.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3331–3344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman
2006 “Political Discourse as Mediated and Public Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 143–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber
2012 “Introduction.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 3–4. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL: http://​opus​.bibliothek​.uniwuerzburg​.de​/volltexte​/2012​/7165​/; URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman
Following Up Across Contexts and Discourse Domains: Introduction.” This volume. Crossref
Girnth, Heiko
2002Sprache und Sprachverwendung in der Politik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1956 “The Nature of Deference and Demeanor.” American Anthropologist 58(3): 475–499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Anchor Books.Google Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut
1993a “Political Language and Textual Vagueness.” Pragmatics 3(1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993b “Evaluation Devices in Newspaper Reports.” Journal of Pragmatics 19(5): 469–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Genres in Political Discourse: The Case of the Parliamentary “Inaugural Speech” of Austrian Chancellors.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, ed. by Piotr Cap & Ursula Okulska (eds), 29–73. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1988Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (3. Aufl., Bd. 1–2, Bd. 2). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1985 “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse analysis (vol. 1,), ed. by Teun van Dijk, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hess-Lüttich, Ernest W.B.
2007(Pseudo-)Argumentation in TV-debates. Journal of Pragmatics 39(8): 1360–1370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holly, Werner, Peter Kühn, and Ulrich Püschel
1986Politische Fernsehdiskussionen. Zur medienspezifischen Inszenierung von Propaganda als Diskussion. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian and Robin Wooffitt
1998Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
1996Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2010 “Identity Co-Construction in Parliamentary Discourse Practices.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, 57–79. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Josef
1991 “Politische Textsorten”. Aspekte der Textlinguistik (Germanistische Linguistik 106/107): 245–278.Google Scholar
2000 “Textsorten im Bereich politischer Institutionen.” In Handbuch der Text- und Gesprächsanalyse (vol. 2), ed. by Gerd Antos, Karin Brinker and Sven F. Sager, 1589–1605. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kühn, Peter
1995Mehrfachadressierung. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno
2003 “What if we Talked Politics a Little?Contemporary Political Theory (2): 143–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. and Michael Short
2007Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Mann, William, and Sandra Thompson
1987Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. Marina del Rey/California.Google Scholar
Martin, Jim R. and David Rose
2008Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, Jim R. and Peter White
2007Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndsmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuolijärvi, Pirkko and Liisa Tiittula
2011 “Irony in Political Television Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(2): 572–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plug, José
2010“Ad-Hominem Arguments in Dutch and the European Parliaments: Strategic Manoeuvring in an Institutional Context. In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, 305–329. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2007Nationale Rhetorik in Fest- und Gedenkreden. Eine diskursanalytische Studie zum „österreichischen Millennium“ in den Jahren 1946 und 1996. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, André Bächtiger, Markus Spörndli, and Marco R. Steenbergen
2004Deliberative Politics in Action. Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, Gerhard
1986Der politische Wortschatz. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Swales, John M.
2004Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans, Rob Grootendorst, and Tjark Kruiger
1987Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Vice, Sue
1997Introducing Bakhtin. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Marcello Dascal
1991 “On Clues and Cues: Strategies of Text-Understanding.” Journal of Literary Semantics 20(1): 18–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Welan, Manfred
1989Regierungserklärungen in Recht und Politik. In Was die Kanzler sagten: Regierungserklärungen der Zweiten Republik, ed. by Maximilian Gottschlich, Oswald Panagl and Manfred Welan, 69–87. Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2011The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke [u.a.]: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth and Kurt Feyaerts
2010Participant Roles and Layered Intersubjectivity in Austrian Parliamentary Debates. Conference Presentation (Vierte Konferenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kognitive Linguistik, Bremen).Google Scholar