Bravo for this editorial!
Users’ comments in discussion forums
In this paper, I study how comments function as follow-ups in the discussion
forums of online newspapers. Follow-ups recontextualize an object of discourse
from its prior context to an ongoing context. A follow-up involves stance-taking,
positioning, and negotiation of meaning. The data were obtained from
one major French online newspaper called lemonde.fr. They consist of ten editorials
with political and social topics, along with their subsequent comments.
The first objective was to find out how, and by which linguistic means, writers
express their stance and evaluate the editorials. It was found that they do it
through axiological adjectives, explicit positioning, and various communicative
acts, as well as by affective, epistemic, and ironic expressions. The second aim
was to examine how the discussion forum posts target the prior discourse, and
open up a negotiation, i.e., what types of responsive and initiative properties
are used to negotiate the meaning. Findings indicate that the comments target
either the content or the stance expressed in the editorial. By using them, users
imply that they know more about the issue or they share the same view.
References
Angouri, Jo and Miriam A. Locher
2012 “
Theorising Disagreement.”
Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1549–53.


Atifi, Hassan and Michel Marcoccia
2012 “
Follow-ups in Online Political Discussions.” In
Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by
Anita Fetzer,
Elda Weizman and
Elisabeth Reber, 22–34. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg. [online]. URL:
[URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.

Baym, Nancy
1998 “
Agreements and Disagreements in a Computer-Mediated Discussion.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (4): 315–45.


Bednarek, Monika and Helen Caple
(eds.) 2012 News Discourse. London & New York: Continuum.

Bolter, Jay D. and Richard Grusin
1999 Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Benveniste, Emile
1966, 1974 Problèmes de linguistique générale. [
Problems in General Linguistics]. Tomes I–II. Paris: Gallimard.

Charaudeau, Patrick
1997 Le discours d’information médiatique. La construction du miroir social. [
Media Information Discourse. The Construction of the Social Mirror]. Paris: Nathan.

Deuze, Marc
2008 “
The Changing Context of News Work: Liquid Journalism and Monitorial Citizenship.”
International Journal of Communication 2, 848–65.

Dostie, Gaétane
2004 Pragmaticalisation et marquers discursifs. Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. [
Pragmaticalization and Discourse Markers. Semantic and Lexicographic Analyses]. Bruxelles: De Boeck/Duculot.


DuBois, John
2007 “
The Stance Triangle.” In:
Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by
Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.

Fetzer, Anita
2007 “
Challenges in Political Interviews.” In
Political Discourse in the Media. Cross-cultural Perspectives, ed. by
Anita Fetzer and
Gerda E. Lauerbach, 161–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber
2012 “
Introduction.” In
Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by
Anita Fetzer,
Elda Weizman and
Elisabeth Reber, 3–4. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL:
[URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.

Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman
Following Up Across Contexts and Discourse Domains: Introduction.” This volume.
Grimshaw, Allen D
1990 “
Introduction.” In
Conflict Talk. Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, ed. by
Allen D. Grimshaw, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gruber, Helmut
1993 “
Evaluation Devices in Newspaper Reports.”
Journal of Pragmatics 19: 469–86.


Gruber, Helmut
2001 “
Questions and Strategic Orientation in Verbal Conflict Sequences.”
Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1815–1857.


Gruber, Helmut
Intertextual References in Austrian Parliamentary Debates: Between Evaluation and Argumentation.” This volume.
Jenkins, Henry
2006 Convergence Culture: Where New and Old Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

Johansson, Marjut
2006 “
Constructing Objects of Discourse in the Broadcast Political Interview.” In
Pragmatic Aspects of Political Discourse in the Media, ed. by
Anita Fetzer and
Elda Weizman.
Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2): 216–29.


Johansson, Marjut
2012 “
Editorial and its Comments. Follow-ups in a Discussion Forum.” In
Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by
Anita Fetzer,
Elda Weizman and
Elisabeth Reber, 151–164. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL:
[URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.

Johansson, Marjut
2014 “
Reading Digital News: Participation Roles, Activities, and Positionings.”
Journal of Pragmatics 72: 31–45.


Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2006 [1980] L’énonciation. De la subjectivité dans le langage. [
Enunciation. About Subjectivity in the Language]. Paris: Armand Colin.

Lambiase, Jacqueline J
2010 “Hanging by a Thread: Topic Development and Death in an Online Discussion of Breaking News.”
Language@Internet 7.

Langlotz, Andreas and Miriam A. Locher
2012 “
Ways of Communicating Emotional Stance in Online Disagreements.”
Journal of Pragmatics 44(12): 1591–606.

Linell, Per
2009 Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Lucy, John A
1993 Reflexive Language: Reported speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Marcoccia, Michel
2004 “
On-line Polylogues: Conversation Structure and Participation Framework in Internet Newsgroups.”
Journal of Pragmatics 36: 115–45.


Moirand, Sophie
2007 Les discours de la presse quotidienne. Observer, analyser, comprendre. [
Discourse in the Press. Observations, Analyses, and Interpretations]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “
Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In
Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by
Maxwell Atkinson J. and
John Heritage, 56–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reich, Zvi
2011 “
User Comments: The Transformation of Participatory Space. Participatory Journalism.” In
Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, ed. by
Jane B. Singer,
Alfred Hermida,
David Domingo,
Ari Heinonen,
Steve Paulussen,
Thorsten Quandt,
Zvi Reich and
Marina Vujnovic, 96–117. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.


Richardson, John E. and James Stanyer
2011 “Reader Opinion in the Digital Age: Tabloid and Broadsheet Newspaper Websites and the Exercise of Political Voice.” Journalism: Theory
,
Practice and Criticism 12(8): 983–1003.

Ruiz, Carlos, David Domingo, Josep Lluís Micó, Javier Diaz-Noci, Koldo Meso, and Pere Masip
2011 “
Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers.”
The International Journal of Press/Politics 16: 463–87.

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.”
Language 54 (2): 361–82.


Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard
1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse. London: Oxford University Press.

Singer, Jane B
2009 “
Separate Spaces: Discourse About the 2007 Scottish Elections on a National Newspaper Web Site.”
The International Journal of Press/Politics 14: 477–96.


Sivenkova, Maria
Metacommunicative Follow-ups in British, German and Russian Political Webchats.” This volume.
Thompson, Geoff and Susan Hunston
2000 “
Evaluation: An Introduction.” In
Geoff Thompson and
Susan Hunston (eds.),
Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vuchinich, Samuel
1990 “
The Sequential Organization of Closing in Verbal Family Conflict.” In
Conflict Talk. Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, ed. by
Allen D. Grimshaw, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weber, Patrick
2013 “
Discussion in the Comments Section: Factors Influencing Participation and Interactivity in Online Newspapers’ Reader Comments.”
New Media & Society, online,
July 2013, 1–17.

Weizman, Elda
2012 “
Negotiating Irony through Follow-Ups: Readers’ Comments on Op-Eds in the Daily Press.” In
Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by
Anita Fetzer,
Elda Weizman and
Elisabeth Reber, 263–276. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL:
[URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.

Cited by
Cited by 10 other publications
Chovanec, Jan
Eller, Monika
Ho, Janet
2022.
Evading the Lockdown: Animal Metaphors and Dehumanization in Virtual Space.
Metaphor and Symbol 37:1
► pp. 21 ff.

Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna & Jan Chovanec
Musolff, Andreas
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
Weizman, Elda
2023.
Recontextualization practices: A scale of directness.
Frontiers in Communication 7

Weizman, Elda & Marjut Johansson
Weizman, Elda & Ayelet Kohn
[no author supplied]
2017.
The digital agora of social media: Introduction.
Discourse, Context & Media 19
► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.