Sociology of Discourse

From institutions to social change

| Aalborg University
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027206527 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027268297 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
Sociology of Discourse takes the perspective that collective actors like social movements are capable of creating social change from below by creating new institutions through alternative discourses. Institutionalization becomes a process of moving away from existing institutions towards creating new ones. While discourses entail openness and enable the questioning of what is instituted, institutions offer continuity and stability to social mobilizations. This dual movement of openness and stabilization explains how social struggles ensure their continuity, without completely assuming the logic of the dominant order. The book proposes an analytical model of social change, which is unfolded through three intertwined areas: discourse, communication, and institution. Collective experiences of social change, from the anti-globalization movement to Occupy, illustrate the main theoretical points and concepts. Through the example of the Platform for People Affected by Mortgages, the book concludes by analyzing how social change from below is possible.
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 61]  2015.  xi, 217 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.61
Table of Contents
Figures
ix–x
Acknowledgments
xi–xii
Sociology of discourse
1–16
Chapter 1. Social change
17–42
Chapter 2. Discourse
43–88
Chapter 3. Communication
89–126
Chapter 4. Institutions
127–160
Chapter 5. “Yes, We Can”: The platform for people affected by mortgages in Spain
161–198
Conclusion
199–204
References
205–214
Index
215–218
“In this Sociology of Discourse, Óscar García Agustín suggests an innovative model that puts discourse and social movements at the very centre of social change processes. Thus, the book examines how discursive practices (such as those of social movements), aimed at the production of social meaning, challenge current institutions and allow for the appearance of new ones. In deploying this approach, the book presents a bright and exciting analysis of some of the major challenging contemporary social movements, such as Piqueteros, V-de Vivienda, Strike Debt, #YoSoy132, Zapatistas, the World Social Forum, Chilean students, and the platform for people affected by mortgages in Spain, among others. This illuminating panorama of ongoing struggles and (possible) social change, which gives prominence to a sociological over a linguistic perspective, is without any doubt one of the major contributions of this book.”
“In this provocative book García places discourse, institutionalisation and social movements front and center of an account of social change. Illustrated with contemporary case studies, and framed in a theoretically rich framework, García challenges us to rethink how power, language and collective agency work to bring about social transformation.”
“One of the main goals of this book is to ask how social movements ensure continuity. Óscar García Agustín proposes to find the answer to this question in the theoretical problematization of the relations between discourse and institutionalization. Now, the constituent processes of anti-globalization and occupy movements also have a book, a sociological reflection of adequate impetus to the analysis of the different components of the movement. The end of the book could not be happier, by introducing the case of the PAH, being both about social unionism and municipalism and from which we can immediately learn about the constituent role of discursive practices. The constituent process is not a fixation of social change but rather its affirmation, always remaining open. It is not the measure of change in terms of success or failure that is interesting, but the renewed dynamics of the constituent power.”
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Agustín, Óscar García
2017.  In Street Art of Resistance, ► pp. 325 ff. Crossref logo
García Agustín, Óscar & Martin Bak Jørgensen
2020. On Transversal Solidarity: An Approach to Migration and Multi-Scalar Solidarities. Critical Sociology ► pp. 089692052098005 ff. Crossref logo
Maarek, Eman A. & Sarah H. Awad
2018.  In Imagining Collective Futures, ► pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Martinez, Miguel A.
2019. Bitter wins or a long-distance race? Social and political outcomes of the Spanish housing movement. Housing Studies 34:10 ► pp. 1588 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Agamben, Giorgio
2013 “Elements for a Theory of Destituent Power.” Living Together in the Heart of the Desert, 1-19. https://​livingtogetherintheheartofthedesert​.wordpress​.com.Google Scholar
Alekos, Jaime
2013 Escrache a Soraya Sáenz de Santa María y represión policial. YouTube video. https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=tJKkRjL1fzE.Google Scholar
Almirón, Pablo
2003 “Luca, el desobediente.” La Haine. http://​www​.lahaine​.org​/global​/luca​_desobediente​.htm.Google Scholar
Andersen, Kurt
2011 “The Protester.” Time, December 14.Google Scholar
Antenas, Josep Maria Antenas, and Esther Vivas
2012 Planeta indignado. Ocupando el futuro. Madrid: Sequitur.Google Scholar
Asambleas Málaga
2012 Estación de Cartama: Desahucio parado. YouTube video. http://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=_YhGVDeuk7s​&list​=PL3D0AF8B9492533C.Google Scholar
Asociación de Sin Papeles de Madrid
2008 “Manifiesto por nuestros hermanos en el fondo del mar, por los que aún seguimos a la deriva.” Transfronterizo, October 17. http://​www​.ferrocarrilclandestino​.net​/spip​.php​?article86.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw
1962 How to do Things with Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986 Problemas de la poética de Dostoievski. Mexico DF: FCE.Google Scholar
Balibar, Étienne
2005 Violencias, identidades y civilidad. Para una cultura política global. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
Barrett, Michelle
1991 The Politics of Truth: From Marx to Foucault. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Benítez, Inés
2013 “The Other Side of the Coin in Spain.” Common Dreams, April 8.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann
(1966) 1989 The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Blanchar, Clara
2013 “ ‘Si el PP desoye un millón de firmas, en España no hay democracia’.” El País, February 11.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Daniel
2006 “Creación humana y creación política.” El Viejo Topo 222-223: 79-83.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1985 “The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups.” Theory and Society 14(6): 723-744. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 “Social Space and Symbolic Power”. Sociological Theory 7(1): 14-25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1993 Sociology in Question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
1996 Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1998 Practical Reason. On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bove, Arianna
2004 “Notes on Paolo Virno’s Quando il verbo si fa Carne. Linguaggio e natura umana .” Generation Online. http://​www​.generation​-online​.org​/p​/fpvirno​.htm.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael
1999 Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith
1997 Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cabrera, Daniel H.
2003 “ ‘Técnica’ y ‘progreso’ como significaciones imaginarias sociales. Elementos para una hermenéutica social de las ‘nuevas tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación’.” Anthropos 198: 106-125.Google Scholar
2004 “Imaginario social, comunicación e identidad colectiva.” Portal Comunicación. http://​www​.portalcomunicacion​.com​/dialeg​/paper​/pdf​/143​_cabrera​.pdf.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia Blancafort, Helena, and Amparo Tusón Valls
2002 Las cosas del decir. Manual de análisis del discurso. Madrid: Ariel.Google Scholar
Calvo, Kerman, Teresa Gómez-Pastrana, and Luis Mena
2011 “Movimiento 15M: ¿quiénes son y qué reivindican?” Zoom Político: Especial 15-M, 4-17. Madrid: Fundación Alternativas.Google Scholar
Campione, Daniel, and Beatriz Rajland
2006 “Piqueteros y trabajadores ocupados en la Argentina de 2001 en adelante: novedades y continuidades en su participación y organización en los conflictos.” In Sujetos sociales y nuevas formas de protesta en la historia reciente de América Latina, ed. by Gerardo Caetano, 297-330. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
Casarini, Luca
2002 “Las calles de Morfeo.” Global, November 29.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius
1987 The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Philosophy, Politics and Autonomy, ed. by David Ames Curtis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997 World in Fragments. Writings on Politics, Society, Psychoanalysis and the Imagination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1998 Los dominios del hombre. Las encrucijadas del laberinto. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
2007 Figures of the Thinkable. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ceberio Belaza, Mónica, and Luis Doncel
2013 “El tribunal de la UE otorga poder a los jueces para frenar desahucios.” El País, March 14.Google Scholar
Chaves, Óscar
2008 “Entrevista: Mousa Faye, de la Asociación de Sin Papeles de Madrid. Reclamamos nuestra parte del pastel.” Periódico Diagonal, October 30.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner
2000 “Discourse and Politics.” In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol 2, ed. by Teun A.van Dijk, 206-230. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough
2005 Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ciaramelli, Fabio
2002 “Creación humana, y paradoja de lo originario.” Archipiélago 54: 58-65.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua
1996 “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. by Seyla Benhabib, 95-119. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Colado, S.
2013 “Interior insta a la policía a criminalizar los escraches llamándolos ‘acoso, coacciones o amenazas’.” Elplural.com, April 22.Google Scholar
Colau, Ada
2013 “Comparecencias en relación con el proyecto de ley de medidas urgentes para reforzar la protección a los deudores hipotecarios.” Diario de Sesiones del Congreso de los Diputados 251: 33-41. http://​www​.congreso​.es​/public​_oficiales​/L10​/CONG​/DS​/CO​/DSCD​-10​-CO​-251​.PDF.Google Scholar
Colau, Ada and Adrià Alemany
2012 Vidas hipotecadas. De la burbuja inmobiliaria al derecho a la vivienda. Barcelona: Cuadrilátero de libros.Google Scholar
2013 ¡Sí se puede! Crónica de una pequeña gran victoria. Barcelona: Destino.Google Scholar
Colectivo Situaciones
2002 19 y 20. Apuntes para el nuevo protagonismo social. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de mano en mano.Google Scholar
Croft, Stuart
2012 Securitizing Islam: Identity and the Search for Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daley, Suzanne
2013 “Leading the Charge Against Spain’s Mortgage Crisis.” New York Times, December 20.Google Scholar
De Barrón, Iñigo
2013 “Un desahucio cada 15 minutos.” El País, April 12.Google Scholar
De Certeau, Michel
(1984) 2011 The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
De Munck, Jean
2000 “La institución según John Searle.” Pensamiento 56(215): 237-264.Google Scholar
Debt Collective
2014 “What Can a Debt Collective Do?” https://​www​.debtcollective​.org​/#scroll.
Deutsche, Rosalyn
1996 Evictions: Art and Spatial Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dhaliwal, Puneet
2012 “Public Squares and Resistance: The Politics of Space in the Indignados Movement.” Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 4(1): 251-273.Google Scholar
Díaz-Salazar, Rafael
1991 El proyecto de Gramsci. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
2011 “15M y 22M. ¿Qué futuro político podemos construir?” El Viejo Topo 282-283: 15-19.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John
(1997) 2005 The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006 Deliberative Global Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1986 El decir y lo dicho. Polifonía de la enunciación. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Dussel, Enrique
2009 Política de la Liberación. Historia mundial y crítica. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
Efe
2013 “ ‘Escrache’ palabra del año para la Fundeu.” El Mundo, December 30.Google Scholar
Escárzaga, Fabiola
2004 “La emergencia indígena contra el neoliberalismo.” Política y Cultura 22: 101-121.Google Scholar
Esther, Comandanta
2001 “Discurso ante el Congreso de la Unión.” Chiapas 11. http://​www​.revistachiapas​.org​/No11​/ch11congreso​.html.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1994 Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 121-138. London: Sage.Google Scholar
(1992) 2003a Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2003b Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, vol 2, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 258-284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Femia, Joseph V.
1981 Gramsci’s Political Thought. Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández-Savater, Amador
2006 “Por dónde pasa hoy la fidelidad al legado político de Castoriadis.” El Viejo Topo 222-223: 95-103.Google Scholar
Fiig, Christina
2011 “A Powerful, Opinion-forming Public? Rethinking the Habermasian Public Sphere in a Perspective of Feminist Theory and Citizenship.” Distinktion 12(3): 291-308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Dan
2003 “Searle and Collective Intentionality. The Self-Defeating Nature of Internalism with Respect to Social Facts.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62(1): 45-66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P.
2003 “Law.” In John Searle, ed. by Barry Smith, 85-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
FLOK Society
2013 “An Open Letter to the Commoners and Co-operators of the World to Participate in the Ecuadorian Transition towards an Open Commons-based Knowledge Society.” http://​floksociety​.org​/carta​-abierta​/#english.
Foro Social Mundial
2009 “Carta de Principios.” Foro Social Mundial de Madrid, June 10. https://​alterglobalizacion​.wordpress​.com​/foro​-social​-mundial​-wsf.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1981 “The Order of Discourse.” In Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, ed. by Robert Young, 48-78. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger, and Gunther Kress
1979 “Critical Linguistics.” In Language and Control, ed. by Roger Fowler, et al., 185-213. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
França, Joao
2013 “Ada Colau: Nunca tiramos la toalla porque no nos lo podemos permitir.” Eldiario.es, February 15.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy
1992 “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. by Craig Calhuon, 109-142. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gadea, Walter Federico
2004 “Más allá de la Constitución. Hegemonía política y democracia radical en Ernesto Laclau.” In Repensar la democracia, ed. by Ramón Soriano, et al., 65-90. Sevilla: Aconcagua Libros.Google Scholar
Gago, Verónica
2014 “La política de los muchos.” Nueva Sociedad 251: 100-112.Google Scholar
Gainza, Patricia
2006 “Entrevista a Michael Hardt. La lucha no es espontánea, necesitamos organizarnos.” Revista del Sur 163: 42-45.Google Scholar
Galeano, Eduardo
2004 “El lenguaje.” Aporrea, October 6. http://​www​.aporrea​.org​/actualidad​/a9990​.html.Google Scholar
Ganuza Fernández, Ernesto
2002 “Poderes locales y procesos participativos: los presupuestos participativos (Córdoba).” In Tomamos la palabra. Experiencias de ciudadanía participativa, ed. by Concha Lorenzana, 65-86. Barcelona: Icaria.Google Scholar
García Agustín, Óscar
2013 “The Art of Non-Playing Chess: The Institutionalization of the Common.” In Post-Crisis Perspectives. The Common and its Powers, ed. by Óscar García Agustín, and Christian Ydesen, 205-226. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
García Negroni, María, and Marta Tordesillas Colado
(eds) 2001 La enunciación en la lengua: de la deixis a la polifonía. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Garea Baragaño, Fernando
2013 “Los españoles confían mucho más en los movimientos sociales que en los políticos.” El País, March 16.Google Scholar
Genkidama Educación
2011 Freezer y su mensaje de maldad hacia los estudiantes Chilenos! YouTube video. https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=uMl​-XPKSP2o.Google Scholar
Gentier, Antoine
2012 “Spanish Banks and the Housing Crisis: Worse than the Subprime Crisis?” International Journal of Business 17(4): 342-351.Google Scholar
Golvano, Fernando
2006 “Cornelius Castoriadis, figuras y praxis de la autonomía.” El Viejo Topo 222-223: 72-77.Google Scholar
Gómez Pérez, Fernando
2013 “Entrevista a la Plataforma de Afectados por la Hipoteca: Hay que dejar de pagar por dignidad.” Iberoamérica Social, December 22. http://​iberoamericasocial​.com​/hay​-que​-dejar​-de​-pagar​-por​-dignidad.Google Scholar
González, Rosario
1996 “Texto y contexto: la ironía como fenómeno del discurso.” Revista Española de Lingüística 26: 57-69.Google Scholar
Graeber, David
2002 “The New Anarchists.” New Left Review 13: 61-73.Google Scholar
Gross, Neil
2006 “Comment on Searle.” Anthropological Theory 6(1): 45-56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, Bernardo
2013 “Ecuador pone rumbo a la economía del bien común.” Eldiario.es, December 25.Google Scholar
Hajer, Maarten
1993 “Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalisation of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Great Britain.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, ed. by Frank Fischer, and John Forester, 43-67. Durham: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning.” In Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, ed. by Margo van den Brink, and Tamara Metze, 65-74. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research.Google Scholar
2011 Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1976 “Antilanguages.” American Anthropologist 78: 570-584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Lene
2006 Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael
2002 “Porto Alegre: Today's Bandung?” New Left Review 14: 112-118.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri
2009 Commonwealth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and John Holloway
2011 “Creating Common Wealth and Cracking Capitalism. A Cross-Reading.” Revista Herramienta 49. http://​www​.herramienta​.com​.ar​/revista​-herramienta​-n​-49​/creating​-common​-wealth​-and​-cracking​-capitalism​-cross​-reading.Google Scholar
Hernández Iglesias, Manuel
1999 “El Trasfondo de Searle.” Teorema 18(1): 61-72.Google Scholar
Hernández González, María Belén
1999 “El humor, la ironía y el cómico: códigos transgresores de lenguajes e ideologías.” Signa. Revista de la Asociación española de Semiótica 8: 217-232.Google Scholar
Hernández Navarro, Luis
2003 “El zapatismo, fuente de inspiración para los movimientos altermundistas.” La Jornada, December 29.Google Scholar
Hervás, Marta
2012 “La lucha antidesahucios, el primer logro del 15-M.” El País, November 24.Google Scholar
Hoffman, John
1984 The Gramscian Challenge. Coercion and Consent in Marxist Political Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holloway, John
2004 “Gente Común, es decir Rebelde: Mucho más que una respuesta a Atilio Borón.” Chiapas 16: 155-164.Google Scholar
2005 Change the World Without Taking Power. London: Pluto Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Brian
2002 “Jeroglíficos del futuro. Jacques Rancière y la estética de la igualdad.” Brumaria 1: 119-122.Google Scholar
Holton, Richard
2007 “Freedom, Coercion and Discursive Control.” In Common Minds. Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit, ed. by Geoffrey Brennan, et al., 104-120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Honrubia Hurtado, Pedro Antonio
2011 “Pienso, luego estorbo. Consumo, luego pienso.” In ¡Indignados! 15M, ed. by Fernando Cabal, 70-87. Madrid: Mandala Ediciones.Google Scholar
Iglesias, Leire
2013 “Comparecencias en relación con el proyecto de ley de medidas urgentes para reforzar la protección a los deudores hipotecarios.” Diario de Sesiones del Congreso de los Diputados 251: 42-43. http://​www​.congreso​.es​/public​_oficiales​/L10​/CONG​/DS​/CO​/DSCD​-10​-CO​-251​.PDF.Google Scholar
Iglesias, Pablo
2003 “Ciclos de movimiento. Conversando con Luca Casarini.” El Viejo Topo 175: 6-15.Google Scholar
Ingrassia, Franco
2006 “Cornelius Castoriadis. Autonomía y dispersión.” El Viejo Topo 222-223: 104-107.Google Scholar
Irujo, José María
2012 “Batalla contra los abusos de una ley.” El País, November 18.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Sarah
2014 “Post-Occupied.” Truth-Out, May 19. http://​truth​-out​.org​/news​/item​/23756​-post​-occupied.Google Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan
2003 Social Theory. Conflict, Cohesion and Consent. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kasperkevic, Jana
2014 “Occupy Activists Abolish $3.85m in Corinthian Colleges Students' Loan Debt.” The Guardian, September 17.Google Scholar
Kluge, Alexander, and Oskar Negt
1993 Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia
1986 The Kristeva Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
La Haine
2001 “ATTAC, ONGs y la burocracia reformista del movimiento antiglobalización.” Rebelión, June 13.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto
1996 Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
2000 “Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics.” In Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, 44-89. London: Verso.Google Scholar
2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
(1985) 2001 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lanzuela, Santiago
2013 “Comparecencias en relación con el proyecto de ley de medidas urgentes para reforzar la protección a los deudores hipotecarios.” Diario de Sesiones del Congreso de los Diputados 251: 41. http://​www​.congreso​.es​/public​_oficiales​/L10​/CONG​/DS​/CO​/DSCD​-10​-CO​-251​.PDF.Google Scholar
Lazzarato, Maurizio
2014 Signs and Machines. Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Lizcano, Emmanuel
2003 “Castoriadis, la autonomía y lo imaginario colectivo: la agonía de la Ilustración.” Anthropos 198: 189-209.Google Scholar
Lois, Marta
2001 “Ernesto Laclau y Chantal Mouffe: hacia una teoría radical de la democracia.” In Teorías políticas contemporáneas, ed. by Ramón Máiz, 397-417. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
Lombardo, Emanuela, Petra Meier, and Mieke Verloo
(eds) 2009 The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality. Stretching, Bending and Policy-making. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
López Pino, Israel
2000 “Marx, Lenin y Gramsci ante el problema de la hegemonía.” Islas 42(124): 122-139.Google Scholar
Machuca, Pablo
2013 “Entrevista a Ada Colau: ‘El PP nos pidió rebajar la presión social a cambio de debatir la ILP’.” El Huffington Post, May 6.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard
1997 Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marazzi, Christian
2008 Capital and Language: From the New Economy to the War Economy. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Marcoulatos, Jordanis
2003 “John Searle and Pierre Bourdieu: Divergent Perspectives on Intentionality and Social Ontology.” Human Studies 26: 67-96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Cabrera, Luis
2011 “15-M: El lenguaje de la revolución, una gramática de la libertad.” In ¡Indignados! 15M, ed. by Fernando Cabal, 92-94. Madrid: Mandala Ediciones.Google Scholar
Martínez de Albéniz, Iñaki
2005 “Usar la palabra política en vano: blasfemia, parodia e ironía como reapropiaciones de lo político.” Foro interno: anuario de teoría política 5: 13-36.Google Scholar
Mejers, Anthonie
2003 “Can Collective Intentionality Be Individualizad?” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62(1): 167-183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melucci, Alberto
1995 “The Process of Collective Identity.” In Social Movements and Culture, ed. by Hank Johnston, and Bert Klandermans, 41-63. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
2001 Vivencia y convivencia. Teoría social para una era de la información. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
Mendiola, Ignacio
2003 “Hacia una redefinición de los movimientos sociales: macro-actores proxémicos.” Atenea Digital 4: 68-86.Google Scholar
Monterde, Arnau
2013 “La potencia ciudadana en red, tecnopolítica y la democracia del futuro.” Redes, Movimientos y Tecnopolítica. http://​civilsc​.net​/node​/70.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal
1993 The Return of the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
2000 The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
2013 Hegemony, Radical Democracy, and the Political, ed. by James Martin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muñiz, Andrés
2013 “Los desahucios mantienen un macabro ritmo de 185 al día.” Público, December 20.Google Scholar
Muñoz, María Antonia
2005 “La difícil construcción de una identidad colectiva: ‘Los piqueteros’.” AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 43: 1-24.Google Scholar
Murray, Daniel
2014 “Prefiguration or Actualization? Radical Democracy and Counter-Institution in the Occupy Movement.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology, November 3. http://​berkeleyjournal​.org​/2014​/11​/prefiguration​-or​-actualization​-radical​-democracy​-and​-counter​-institution​-in​-the​-occupy​-movement.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio
2001 “Contrapoder.” In Contrapoder. Una introducción, ed. by Colectivo Situaciones, 83-92. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de mano en mano.Google Scholar
Noble, Trevor
2000 Social Theory and Social Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nolasco, Patricio
1997 “Cambio político, estado y poder: un acercamiento a la posición zapatista.” Chiapas 5: 47-73.Google Scholar
Otero, Héctor, Javier Anibarro, and Sergio Puerto
2013 De la dación en pago a la ley de quiebra personal. Una revisión crítica de la política de vivienda en la crisis hipotecaria. Madrid: Labatorio de Alternativas.Google Scholar
Ovejero, Félix
2005 Proceso abierto. El socialismo después del socialismo. Barcelona: Tusquets.Google Scholar
Pacherie, Elisabeth
2003 “Is Collective Intentionality Really Primitive?” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62(1): 167-183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
PAH
2013a “De ciudadano a presidente. La campaña de escrache.” http://​escrache​.afectadosporlahipoteca​.com.
PAH, and DESC
2011 “Regular la dación en pago: una reforma urgente, justa y necesaria.” http://​afectadosporlahipoteca​.files​.wordpress​.com​/2010​/02​/dacion​-en​-pago​_pah​_definitiva​.pdf.
Pavón, Héctor
2004 “Entrevista a Paolo Virno: Crear una nueva esfera pública, sin Estado.” Clarín, December 24.Google Scholar
Pedrol, Xavier
2002 “Castoriadis: un proyecto de reilustración.” Archipiélago 54: 25-30.Google Scholar
Pejenaute, Leyre
2012 “El drama de los desahucios dispara el negocio de los ‘pisos de patada’.” El País, November 21.Google Scholar
Pérez-Díaz, Víctor
1997 La esfera pública y la sociedad civil. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Petras, James
2002 “Porto Alegre 2002: A Tale of Two Forums.” Monthly Review 11(53): 56-61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip
(1997) 1999 Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001 A Theory of Freedom. From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2003 “Groups with Minds of Their Own.” Socializing Metaphysics: the Nature of Social Reality, ed. by Frederick Schmitt, 167-193. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
2004 “Liberalismo y republicanismo.” In Nuevas ideas republicanas. Autogobierno y libertad, ed. by Félix Ovejero, et al., 115-135. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
2007 “Responsibility Incorporated.” Ethics 117(2): 171-201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne
2000 “Feminism and Republicanism: Is This a Plausible Alliance?” Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 279-293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polaino Navarrete, Miguel, and Miguel Polaino-Orts
2004 Cometer delitos con palabras. Teoría de los actos de habla y funcionalismo jurídico-penal. Madrid: Dykinson.Google Scholar
Prado, Cristina Medina
2014 “Our Money: Our Place. Exploring ‘Puma LETS as a Micro-Political Tool in the Context of Economic Crisis’.” Master’s thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Ramoneda, Josep
1999 Después de la pasión política. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Ramonet, Ignacio
1998 “Introducción: pensamiento único.” In Pensamiento crítico vs. pensamiento único. Le Monde Diplomatique, edición española, 15-17. Madrid: Debate.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques
2011 Momentos políticos. Madrid: Clave Intelectual.Google Scholar
Reséndiz, Gilberto
1999 “Los cauces institucionales.” La Jornada, December 27.Google Scholar
Riera, Miguel
2012 “Ante el esclavismo que nos amenaza. Entrevista a Chema Ruiz.” El Viejo Topo 294-295: 50-53.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Emmanuel
2002 “Límite y tragedia. La libertad en Castoriadis.” Archipiélago 54: 67-71.Google Scholar
Rolandsen Agustín, Lise
2013 Gender Equality, Intersectionality and Diversity in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romero Vázquez, Bernardo
1998 “Los Discursos de Institución y la Conformación de la Subjetividad; el Caso de los ‘Adictos’.” Razón y Palabra 11. http://​www​.cem​.itesm​.mx.Google Scholar
Rosa, Isaac
2013 “El año del escrache.” Eldiario.es, December 26.Google Scholar
RT America
2013 Occupy's 'Strike Debt' Buys Debt Cheaply... Then Forgives It. YouTube video. https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=VaFGC8jGS3k.Google Scholar
Runciman, David
2007 “The Paradox of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 15(1): 93-114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rutelli, Romana
2004 “El texto dentro del texto y la “explosión”: ironía, parodia y otros casos.” Entretextos: Revista Electrónica Semestral de Estudios Semióticos de la Cultura 4: 68-86.Google Scholar
Sainz Pezonaga, Aurelio
2011 “El 15 M como multitud libre. Una mirada spinozista sobre la Spanish revolution.” Rebelión, July 2.Google Scholar
Sánchez Cedillo, Raúl
2012 “El 15M como insurrección del cuerpo-máquina.” Anthropos 234: 216-224.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Philip
2000 “Nation and Communicative Space.” In Media Power, Professionals and Policy, ed. by Howard Tumber, 99-115. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A.
2008 “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourses.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303-326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C.
1999 Domination and the Arts of Resistance. Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1990 “Collective Intentions and Actions.” In Intentions in Communication, ed. by Philip R. Cohen, et al., 401-415. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1998 Mind, Language and Society. Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
2005 Libertad y neurobiología. Reflexiones sobre el libre albedrío, el lenguaje y el poder político. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Seippel, Ørnulf
2001 “From Mobilization to Institutionalization? The Case of Norwegian Environmentalism.” Acta Sociologica 44(2): 123-137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serrano Gómez, Enrique
1994 Legitimación y racionalización. Weber y Habermas: la dimensión normativa de un orden secularizado. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Smith, Barry
2003 “John Searle: From Speech Acts to Social Reality.” In John Searle, ed. by Barry Smith, 1-33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barry, and John Searle
2003 “The Construction of Social Reality: An Exchange.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62(1): 283-309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sopeña Balordi, Amalia Emma
1997 “El concepto de ironía: de tropo a ambigüedad argumentativa.” Revista de Filología Francesa 12: 451-460.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suh, Doowon
2011 “Institutionalizing Social Movements: The Dual Strategy of the Korean Women’s Movement.” The Sociological Quarterly 52: 442-471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R.
1998 “Beyond the Republican Revival.” Yale Law Journal 97(8): 1539-1590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svampa, Maristella, and Sebastian Pereyra
2003 Entre la ruta y el barrio. La experiencia de las organizaciones piqueteras. Buenos Aires: Biblos.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sydney
1998 Power in Movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles
2004 Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles
1978 From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison/Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
1998 “Conflicto político y cambio social.” In Los movimientos sociales. Transformaciones políticas y cambio cultural, ed. by Pedro Ibarra, and Benjamín Tejerina, 25-41. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
Toledano, Ruth
2013 “El escrache de Gallardón.” Eldiario.es, December 29.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain
1992 “Two Interpretations of Contemporary Social Change.” In Social Change and Modernity, ed. by Hans Haferkamp, and Neil J. Smelser, 55-78. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo
2002 The Philosophy of Social Practices. A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
V. de Vivienda
2006 “Manifiesto por una vivienda digna.” 20 Minutos, June 4.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1998 Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Virno, Paolo
2003 Gramática de la multitud. Para un análisis de las formas de vida contemporáneas. Buenos Aires: Puñaladas.Google Scholar
2005 Cuando el verbo se hace carne. Lenguaje y naturaleza humana. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N.
1992 El marxismo y la filosofía del lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
YoSoy132
2012a “Manifesto.” http://​sosyosoy132​.wordpress​.com​/manifesto.
Young, Iris Marion
1996 “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. by Seyla Benhabib, 120-135. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zibechi, Raúl
2004 “Foro Social Mundial: caminar lento para llegar lejos.” In Mumbai (Foro Social Mundial 2004): balance y perspectivas de un movimiento de movimientos, ed. by Esther Vivas, 81-86. Barcelona: Icaria.Google Scholar
2005 “Foro Social Mundial: el cambio desde los márgenes.” ALAI, América Latina en Movimiento, January 30. http://​alainet​.org​/active​/7495​&lang​=es.Google Scholar
Subjects

Communication Studies

Communication Studies

Linguistics

Pragmatics
Discourse studies

Sociology

Sociology
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2015017516 | Marc record