Redefining Trial by Media
Towards a critical-forensic linguistic interface
Redefining Trial by Media: Towards a critical-forensic linguistic interface applies a range of linguistic models to recast trial by media not as a sensationalist and infrequent phenomenon, but as a systematic and routine process. Using critical discourse analysis and cognitive linguistic models, this book builds a Spectrum of Trial by Media which views juries in criminal trials as moulded by ideological media-made constructions of crime. The role of these media constructions is enhanced by the isolation levied on jurors by the linguistic composition of trial language, and reinforced by the language strategies of legal professionals in court. Critically deconstructing media portrayals of crime and forensically examining the language of criminal proceedings, this book offers a redefinition of trial by media which casts the role of the press as much more prevalent in the courtroom trial than is presently appreciated.
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 67] 2016. xiii, 325 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
List of tables
Chapter 1. Defining the scope of the inquiry
Chapter 2. Direct and enhanced trial by media
Chapter 3. Media-made crime
Chapter 4. Reinforced Trial by Media: Smuggled narratives in court
Chapter 5. Reinforced Trial by Media: Evaluative key in court
Chapter 6. Conclusion: Reconceiving the jury
Cited by other publications
Bartley, Leanne Victoria
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Abbott, Walter, Hall, Flora, and Elizabeth Linville.
1993 Jury research: A review and bibliography. Philadelphia: American Law Institute-American Bar Association.
Aldridge, Michelle, and June Luchjenbroers
2007 “Linguistic Manipulations in Legal Discourse: Framing questions and ‘smuggling’ information.” Speech, Language and the Law 14 (3): 85–107.
1971 Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.
Anderson, Irina, and Geoffrey Beattie
1991 The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bennett, W. Lance, and Martha S. Feldman
1981 Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom. London: Tavistock.
1985 “The end of legalese: The game is over.” Review of Law and Social Change 13: 519–573.
Bowal, Peter, and Irene Wanke
Boyce, Ronald, and Rollin Perkins
2000 Criminal Law, 3rd Edition. New York: Foundation.
Brown, David, and David Neal
1988 “Show Trials: The Media and the Gang of Twelve.” In The Jury Under Attack, ed. by Mark Findlay, and Peter Duff, 126–140. London and Sydney: Butterworths.
1996 “Frames for thinking: Ways of making meaning.” In Modes of Thought: Explorations in Culture and Cognition, ed. by David Olsen, and Nancy Torrance, 93–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1999 A Theory of the Trial. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Burt, Martha, and Rochelle Semmel Albin
1997 “Performing gender identity: young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity.” In Language and Masculinity, ed. by Sally Johnson, S. and Ulrike Meinhof, 47–65. Oxford: Blackwell.
2000 “Corpus-Based Analysis of Evaluative Lexis.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoffrey Thompson, 38–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charrow, Robert, and Veda Charrow
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
1992 “The Linguistics of Blame.” In Language, Text and Context, ed. by Michael Toolan, 208–224. London: Routledge.
1997 Without a Doubt. New York: Viking.
1996 Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.
Conley, John, O’Barr, William, and E. Allan Lind
1978 “The power of language: Presentational style in the courtroom.” Duke Law Journal: 1375–1399.
Conley, John, and, William O’Barr
1998 Just Words: Law, language and power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Connell, Ian and Adam Mills
Conrad, Susan, and Douglas Biber
2000 “Adverbial Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoffrey Thompson, 56–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Constitution of the United States of America
. In Hames, Tim, and Nicol Rae 1996 Governing America. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Contempt of Court Act
. Chapter 49, 27th July 1981 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 28/10/2010.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), Council of Europe
, 04th November 1950 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 16/06/2011.
Corker, David, and David Young
2003 Abuse of Process in Criminal Proceedings. London: Butterworths.
Coulthard, Malcolm, and Alison Johnson
2007 An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.
(eds) 2010 The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. London: Routledge.
Cox, Michelle, and Sarah Tanford
1989 “Effects of evidence and instructions in civil trials: An experimental investigation of rules of admissibility.” Social Behaviour 4: 31–55.
Crime and Disorder Act
. Chapter 37, 31st July 1998 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 01/02/2013.
Criminal Justice Act
. Chapter 44, 20th November 2003 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 26/01/2012.
Criminal Law Act
. Chapter 45, 29th July 1977 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 28/02/2013.
Crystal, David, and Derek Davy
1969 Investigating English Style. London: Longman.
2013 Oppositions and Ideology in News Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
Davis, Howard H.
Devlin, The Hon. Sir Patrick A.
1956 Trial by Jury. London: Stevens.
De Jour, Belle
2005 The Intimate Adventures of a London Call Girl. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
Diamond, Shari Seidman, Vidmar, Neil, Rose, Mary, Ellis, Leslie, and Beth Murphy
2003 “Inside the Jury Room: Evaluating Juror Discussions During Trial.” Judicature 87 (2): 54–60.
Duff, Peter, and Mark Findlay
Dumas, Bethany K.
2000 “US pattern jury instructions: problems and proposals.” Forensic Linguistics 7 (1): 49–71.
Ehrlich, Susan, and Susan Levesque
1996 “Discursive practices, point of view, and the representation of sexual harassment.” In Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference , ed. by Warner, Natasha, Ahlers, Jocelyn, Bilmes, Leela, Oliver, Monica, Wertheim, Suzanne, and Mel Chen, 191–200. Berkeley, CA.
English, Peter, and Bruce Sales
1987 Real Rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
1989/2001 Language and Power. London: Longman.
1995 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
1995 Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse Studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
Felton Rosulek, Laura
Findlay, Mark, and Peter Duff
(eds) 1988 The Jury Under Attack. London and Sydney: Butterworths.
1988 “The Role of the Jury in a Fair Trial.” In The Jury Under Attack, ed. by Mark Findlay, and Peter Duff, 161–172. London and Sydney: Butterworths.
Finkel, Norman J.
1995 Commonsense justice: Jurors’ notions of the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Finkel, Norman J. and Bruce D. Sales
1980 Manufacturing the News. Austin, TX and London: University of Texas Press.
1972 The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon.
1979 Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison. Trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Vintage.
1980 Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Fowler, Roger, Hodge, Bob, Kress, Gunther, and Tony Trew
1979 Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
1981 Literature as Social Discourse: The Practice of Linguistic Discourse. London: Batsford Academic.
1991 Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
1988 “Jury Selection in Trials of Commonwealth Offences.” In The Jury Under Attack, ed. by Mark Findlay and Peter Duff, 112–126. London and Sydney: Butterworths.
Galtung, Johan, and Mari Holmboe Ruge
Garzone, Giuliana, and Francesca Santulli
2004 “What can corpus linguistics do for discourse analysis?” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarmann, 71–88. New York: Peter Lang.
2003 Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gibbons, John, and M.Teresa Turell
Goldberg, Hank M.
1996 The Prosecution Responds. Secaucus, NJ: Birch Lane Press.
1971 Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
1998 The Juryman’s Tale. London: Bloomsbury.
1995 “Lipservice on the fantasy lines.” In Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, ed. by Kira Hall, and Mary Bucholtz, 183–216. London: Routledge.
1978 Language as Social Semiotic: the Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
1979 “Modes of meaning and modes of expression: types of grammatical structure, and their determination by different semantic functions.” In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: Essays Offers to William Haas, ed. by David Allerton, Edward Carney, and David Holdcroft, 57–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar 2nd Edition. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael, and Christian Matthiessen
1999 Constructing Experience Through Meaning: a Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar 3rd Edition. London: Arnold.
Harcup, Tony, and Deirdre O’Neill
2006 “Beyond “reasonable doubt”: The criminal standard of proof instruction as communicative act.” Speech , Language and the Law 13 (2): 159–188.
2007b “Judgement in Court: Evaluating Participants in Courtroom Discourse.” In Language and the Law: International Outlooks, ed. by Krysztof, Kredens, and Stanislaw Gozdz-Raskowski, 145–179. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.
(ed) 1967) Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
1990 Chapters on Legal English: Aspects Past and Present of the Language of the Law. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatamia.
1995 Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
Holmes, Oliver Wendell
1881 The Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2009.
Human Rights Act
. Chapter 42, 9th November 1998 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 16/06/2011.
Human Trafficking and Exploitation Act (NI)
. Chapter 2, 15th January 2015 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 31/10/2015.
Hunston, Susan, and Geoffrey Thompson
(eds) 2000 Evaluation in Text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Iedema, Rick, Feez, Susan, and Peter R.R.White
1994 Media Literacy (Write it Right Literacy in Industry Research Project – Stage 2). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
Ito, Hon. Judge Lance
1995 “Judge Ito’s 9/95 Instructions in O.J. Simpson’s criminal case.” Lectric Law Library: www.lectlaw.com/files/cas62.htm.
1995 Making Sense in Law: Linguistic, Psychological and Semiotic Perspectives. Liverpool: Deborah Charles.
Jones, Phil, and Clare Wardle
. Chapter 23, 09th July 1974 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 18/02/2011.
Juries Amendment Act (Australia)
. C1985A00118. www.comlaw.gov.au. Accessed 27/02/2011.
Jury Act (Australia)
. C1965A00013. www.comlaw.gov.au. Accessed 27/02/2011.
Kalven, Harry, and Hans Zeisel
1966 The American Jury. Boston: Little Brown.
Kebbell, Mark, Deprez, Steven, and Graham Wagstaff
1998 The Newspapers Handbook, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
1995 Mistrial of the Century: A Private Diary of the Jury System on Trial. Los Angeles, CA: Dove Books.
2000 The First Casualty: The History of War Correspondents and Propaganda. London: Prion.
1995 Private Diary of an OJ Juror. Los Angeles, CA: Dove Books.
Kramer, Geoffrey, and Dorean Koenig
1990 “Do jurors understand criminal instructions?” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 23 (3): 401–438.
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
1967 “Narrative Analysis.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
1994 Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1975 Women and Women’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
1992 Apprehending the Criminal: The Production of Crime in Nineteenth Century Discourse. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Levi, Michael, and David Corker
1996 “Pre-trial publicity and its treatment in the English courts.” Criminal Law Review 1996, Sep: 622–632.
1982 “Human Rights in the English Criminal Trial.” In Human Rights in Criminal Procedure, ed. by John Andrews, 63–123. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.
Lieberman, Joel and Bruce Sales
Lind, E.Allan, and William O’Barr
1979 “The social significance of speech in the courtroom.” In Language and Social Psychology, ed. by Howard Giles, and Robert St Clair, 66–87. Oxford: Blackwell.
Luchjenbroers, June, and Michelle Aldridge
1979 Conviction. London: McMillan.
1988 “Is Jury Research Dead?” In The Jury Under Attack, ed. by Mark Findlay, and Peter Duff, 27–40. London and Sydney: Butterworths.
McHugh, The Hon. Mr Justice M.
1988 “Jurors’ Deliberations, Jury Secrecy, Public Policy and the Law of Contempt.” In The Jury Under Attack, ed. by Mark Findlay and Peter Duff, 56–74. London and Sydney: Butterworths.
Machado, Helena, and Filipe Santos
2008 “News Discourse I: Understanding the social goings-on behind news texts.” In Language and Power, ed. by Andrea Mayr, 90–115. London: Continuum.
Machin, David, and Sarah Niblock
2006 News Production: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Machin, David, and Teun van Leeuwen
2007 Global Media Discourse. London: Routledge.
Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr
2012 How To Do Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Manzo, John F.
2009 “Anatomy of a Jury Trial.” eJournalUSA, US Department of State, 14 (7).
Martin, James R.
2000 “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoffrey Thompson, 142–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, James R., and David Rose
2003 Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
Martin, James R., and Peter R.R. White
Matoesian, Gregory M.
1993 Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom. Oxford and Cambridge: Polity.
2001. Law and Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maynard, Douglas W., and John F. Manzo
2008 Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse. London: Continuum.
1963 The Language of the Law. Boston: Little Brown.
1975 “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In The Psychology of Computer Vision, ed. by Patrick H. Winston, 211–278. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Morison, John, and Philip Leith
1992 The Barrister’s World and the Nature of Law. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
2003 “Papers Could Face Prosecution over Reporting of Case.” Guardian, 18th December 2003: 6.
2003 Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Offences Against the Person Act
. Chapter 100, 06th August 1861 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 31/05/2011.
Official Secrets Act
. Chapter 6, 11th May 1989 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 31/01/2011.
An Overview of Sexual Offending in England and Wales
2013 Joint Report for the Ministry of Justice, the Office of National Statistics, and the Home Office. www.rapecrisis.org.uk. Accessed 31/10/2015.
Petrocelli, Daniel M.
1998 Triumph of Justice: The Final Judgement on the Simpson Saga. New York: Crown Publishers.
Policing and Crime Act
. Chapter 26, 12th November 2009 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 20/01/2012.
Richardson, John E.
Road Traffic Act
. Chapter 20, 30th March 1972 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 09/09/2011.
2011 (ed.) Reading the Riots. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2011/dec/14/reading-the-riots-investigating-england-s-summer-of-disorder-full-report. Accessed 01/08/2012.
1978 “Principles of Categorisation.” In Cognition and Categorisation, ed. by Eleanor Rosch and Barbara Bloom Lloyd. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
1980 Educating Rita. London: Longman.
Schank, Roger C., and Robert P. Abelson
1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schank, Roger C.
1982 Dynamic Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2001 Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Secret Diaries of a Call Girl (2007–2010). Lucy Prebble and Simeon Goulden
. Independent Television (ITV).
Severance, Laurence, Greene, Edith, and Elizabeth Loftus
Sexual Offences Act
. Chapter 42, 20th November 2003 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 20/01/2012.
1976 “Jury nullification in the American system: A sceptical view.” Texas Law Review: 488–506.
2004 Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.
2014 Stylistics: A resource book for students. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
Simpson, Paul, and Andrea Mayr
2010 Language and Power. London: Routledge.
Smith, Vicki. L.
Smith, Vicki L.
Smith, Vicki L. and Christina A. Studebaker
Solan, Lawrence M. and Peter M. Tiersma
2005 Speaking of Crime: The language of criminal justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1980 Man Made Language. London: Routledge.
Talbot, Mary, Atkinson, Karen, and David Atkinson
2003 Language and Power in the Modern World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
1990 You Just Don’t Understand: Men and Women in Conversation. New York: Morrow.
1999 Rape and the Culture of the Courtroom. New York: New York University Press.
Telecommunications Act (USA)
. USC104–110, 20th February 1996 www.fcc.gov/telecom.html. Accessed 20/02/2011.
. Chapter 60, 26th July 1968 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 27/06/2012.
Thompson, Geoffrey, and Jianglin Zhou
2000 “Evaluation and Organization in Text: The Structuring Role of Evaluative Disjuncts.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoffrey Thompson, 121–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tiersma, Peter M.
1999 Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2001 “The rocky road to legal reform: improving the language of jury instructions.” Brooklyn Law Review 66 (4): 1081–118.
1996 Total Speech: An Integrational Approach to Language. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
1979 “Theory and Ideology at Work.” In Language and Control, ed. by Roger Fowler, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew, 94–117. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
. Resolution 217 A (III), General Assembly of the United Nations, 10th December 1948 www.legislation.gov.uk. Assessed 25/06/2011.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1996 “Discourse Power and Access.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmin Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard, 84–104. London: Routledge.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2003 Courtroom Psychology and Trial Advocacy. New York: ALM.
Walby, Sylvia, and Jonathan Allen
1914 “The Economy and the Arena of Normative and De facto Powers.” In Economy and Society, ed. by Guenther Roth, and Claus Wittich. New York: Bedminster Press.
West, Candace and Don H. Zimmerman
1983 “Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons.” In Language, Gender and Society, ed. by Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae, and Nancy Henley, 102–117. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
White, Peter R.R.
1998 Telling Media Tales: The News Story as Rhetoric. PhD Thesis. Sydney: University of Sydney.
2003 ‘“Reasonable man” and “reasonable doubt”: the English Language, Anglo culture and Anglo-American law.” Forensic Linguistics 10 (1): 1–22.
Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act
. Chapter 23, 27th July 1999 www.legislation.gov.uk. Accessed 15/03/2013.
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009030 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Pragmatics
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2016015169