Cover not available
Part of
Identity Struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world
Edited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Stephanie Schnurr
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 69] 2017
► pp. 387–406

Chapter 21
Identity and space

Discourse perspectives

The aim of this chapter is to unpack the links between identity, space and discourse in organizational settings. Following a constructivist approach, the chapter first explores the nexus between space and discourse in general terms, before moving on to the more specific links between space and identity, both in the public domain and in organizations. With the conceptual background thus mapped out, the chapter then proceeds to present an exploratory case study involving a newly built university campus. Both during the building process and after the move, discourse could be seen to be the vehicle through which space was constructed, and struggles over identity and power carried out.
Keywords: organizational discourse, space and identity, power
Article outline
  • Introduction: Aims and theoretical framework
  • Space and discourse
  • Identity and organizational space
  • Discourse, space and identity on a new university campus: An exploratory case study
    • Background
    • Discourse about and in space
  • Critical reflections
  • Concluding thoughts
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.21mau
References (39)
References
Allen, John, Doreen Massey and Allan Cochrane. 1998. Rethinking the Region. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alvesson, Mats and Stanley A. Deetz. 2006. “Critical theory and postmodernism approaches to organizational studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, ed. by Stewart R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, Thomas B. Lawrence and Walter R. Nord, 255–283. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Pamela and Susan Jack. 2008. “Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers”. The Qualitative Report 14(4): 544–559.Google Scholar
Beyes, Timon and Chris Steyaert. 2011. “Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space.” Organization: 1–17.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, and Thomas A. Markus. 2002. The Words Between the Spaces. Buildings and Language. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanlat, Jean-François. 2006. “Space, organization and management thinking: A socio-historical perspective.” In Space, Organizations and Management Theory, ed. by Stewart R. Clegg and Martin Kornberger, 17–43. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, Stewart R. and Martin Kornberger. 2006a. “Organising space.” In Space, Organizations and Management Theory, ed. by Stewart R. Clegg and Martin Kornberger, 143–162. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
(eds). 2006b. Space, Organizations and Management Theory. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Dale, Karen. 2005. “Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control.” Organization 12 (5): 649–678. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dale, Karen and Gibson Burrell. 2008. The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gehl, Jan. 2011 [1971]. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington etc.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 2002. “What buildings do.” Theory and Society 31: 35–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gobo, Giampietro. (2004) ‘Sampling, representativeness and generalizability’, in C. Seale et al. (eds), Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, pp. 405‒426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Phillip and André Spicer. 2011. “Academic architecture and the constitution of the new model worker.” Culture and Organization 17 (2): 91–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugaard, Mark. 2009. “Power and hegemony.” In The Sage Handbook of Power, ed. by Stewart R. Clegg and Mark Haugaard, 239–255. London etc.: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernes, Tor. 2004. The Spatial Construction of Organization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, Martin and Stewart R. Clegg. 2004. “Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building.” Organization Studies 25 (7): 1095–1114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2010: Language and the Market Society. Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Language, space and the law: A study of directive signs.” The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19 (2): 189–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Signs of the times: A discourse perspective on public signage, urban space and the law.” In The Discourse Reader. 3rd edition, ed. by Nikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, 386–403. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayer, Robert R. and Ernest Greenwood. 1980. The Design of Social Policy Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Rodney T. and Betty Malen. 1991. “Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: Applying the exploratory case study method.” Review of Educational Research 61(3): 265–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. Douglas and Karl E. Weick. 1990. “Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization.” Academy of Management Review 15 (2): 203–223.Google Scholar
Pälli, Pekka, Eero Vaara and Virpi Sorsa. 2009. “Strategy as text and discursive practice: A genre-based approach to strategizing in city administration.” Discourse & Communication 3 (3): 303–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Tim and Ole B. Jensen. 2003. “Linking discourse and space: Towards a cultural sociology of space in analysing spatial policy discourses.” Urban Studies 40 (1): 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron and Suzie Wong Scollon. 2003. Discourses in Place. Language in the Material World. New York and London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, Elana and Durk Gorter (eds). 2009. Linguistic Landscape. Expanding the Scenery. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shohamy, Elana, Eliezer Ben-Rafael and Monica Barni (eds). 2010. Linguistic Landscape in the City. Bristol etc.: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Stenglin, Maree. 2009. “Space and communication in exhibitions.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. by C. Jewitt, 272–283. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Scott and André Spicer. 2007. “Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces.” International Journal of Management Reviews 9 (4): 325–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Gara. 2011. A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry 17(6): 511–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warf, Barney and Santa Arias (eds). 2014. The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warren, S. 2006. “Hot nesting? A visual exploration of personalized workspaces in a hot-desk office environment.” In The Speed of Organization, ed. by Peter Case, Simon Lilley and Tom Owens, 119–146. Liber: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E. 1976. “Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Meredith M. 2000. “Office clutter or meaningful personal displays: The role of office personalization in employee and organizational well-being.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 20: 239–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wineman, Jean D., and John Peponis. 2010. “Constructing spatial meaning. Spatial affordances in museum design.” Environment and Behavior 42 (1): 86–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer (eds). 2015. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3rd edition. London etc.: Sage.Google Scholar
Yin, Robert K. 1984. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage [5th edition: 2013].Google Scholar