Chapter published in:
Identity Struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world
Edited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Stephanie Schnurr
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 69] 2017
► pp. 387–406

Identity and space

Discourse perspectives

| WU Vienna
The aim of this chapter is to unpack the links between identity, space and discourse in organizational settings. Following a constructivist approach, the chapter first explores the nexus between space and discourse in general terms, before moving on to the more specific links between space and identity, both in the public domain and in organizations. With the conceptual background thus mapped out, the chapter then proceeds to present an exploratory case study involving a newly built university campus. Both during the building process and after the move, discourse could be seen to be the vehicle through which space was constructed, and struggles over identity and power carried out.
Keywords: organizational discourse, space and identity, power
Published online: 26 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.21mau
References

References

Allen, John, Doreen Massey and Allan Cochrane
1998 Rethinking the Region. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alvesson, Mats and Stanley A. Deetz
2006 “Critical theory and postmodernism approaches to organizational studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, ed. by Stewart R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, Thomas B. Lawrence and Walter R. Nord, 255–283. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Pamela and Susan Jack
2008 “Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers”. The Qualitative Report 14(4): 544–559.Google Scholar
Beyes, Timon and Chris Steyaert
2011 “Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space.” Organization: 1–17.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, and Thomas A. Markus
2002 The Words Between the Spaces. Buildings and Language. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanlat, Jean-François
2006 “Space, organization and management thinking: A socio-historical perspective.” In Space, Organizations and Management Theory, ed. by Stewart R. Clegg and Martin Kornberger, 17–43. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, Stewart R. and Martin Kornberger
2006a “Organising space.” In Space, Organizations and Management Theory, ed. by Stewart R. Clegg and Martin Kornberger, 143–162. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
(eds) 2006b Space, Organizations and Management Theory. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Dale, Karen
2005 “Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control.” Organization 12 (5): 649–678. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dale, Karen and Gibson Burrell
2008 The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gehl, Jan
2011 [1971] Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington etc.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F.
2002 “What buildings do.” Theory and Society 31: 35–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gobo, Giampietro
(2004) ‘Sampling, representativeness and generalizability’, in C. Seale et al. (eds), Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, pp. 405‒426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Phillip and André Spicer
2011 “Academic architecture and the constitution of the new model worker.” Culture and Organization 17 (2): 91–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugaard, Mark
2009 “Power and hegemony.” In The Sage Handbook of Power, ed. by Stewart R. Clegg and Mark Haugaard, 239–255. London etc.: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernes, Tor
2004 The Spatial Construction of Organization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, Martin and Stewart R. Clegg
2004 “Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building.” Organization Studies 25 (7): 1095–1114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri
1991 The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde
2010: Language and the Market Society. Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012 “Language, space and the law: A study of directive signs.” The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19 (2): 189–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Signs of the times: A discourse perspective on public signage, urban space and the law.” In The Discourse Reader. 3rd edition, ed. by Nikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, 386–403. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayer, Robert R. and Ernest Greenwood
1980 The Design of Social Policy Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Rodney T. and Betty Malen
1991 “Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: Applying the exploratory case study method.” Review of Educational Research 61(3): 265–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. Douglas and Karl E. Weick
1990 “Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization.” Academy of Management Review 15 (2): 203–223.Google Scholar
Pälli, Pekka, Eero Vaara and Virpi Sorsa
2009 “Strategy as text and discursive practice: A genre-based approach to strategizing in city administration.” Discourse & Communication 3 (3): 303–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Tim and Ole B. Jensen
2003 “Linking discourse and space: Towards a cultural sociology of space in analysing spatial policy discourses.” Urban Studies 40 (1): 7–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron and Suzie Wong Scollon
2003 Discourses in Place. Language in the Material World. New York and London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, Elana and Durk Gorter
(eds) 2009 Linguistic Landscape. Expanding the Scenery. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shohamy, Elana, Eliezer Ben-Rafael and Monica Barni
(eds) 2010 Linguistic Landscape in the City. Bristol etc.: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Stenglin, Maree
2009 “Space and communication in exhibitions.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. by C. Jewitt, 272–283. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Scott and André Spicer
2007 “Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces.” International Journal of Management Reviews 9 (4): 325–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Gara
2011 A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry 17(6): 511–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warf, Barney and Santa Arias
(eds) 2014 The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warren, S.
2006 “Hot nesting? A visual exploration of personalized workspaces in a hot-desk office environment.” In The Speed of Organization, ed. by Peter Case, Simon Lilley and Tom Owens, 119–146. Liber: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E.
1976 “Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Meredith M.
2000 “Office clutter or meaningful personal displays: The role of office personalization in employee and organizational well-being.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 20: 239–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wineman, Jean D., and John Peponis
2010 “Constructing spatial meaning. Spatial affordances in museum design.” Environment and Behavior 42 (1): 86–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer
(eds) 2015 Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3rd edition. London etc.: Sage.Google Scholar
Yin, Robert K.
1984 Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage [5th edition: 2013].Google Scholar