Cover not available
Part of
Greece in Crisis: Combining critical discourse and corpus linguistics perspectives
Edited by Ourania Hatzidaki and Dionysis Goutsos
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 70] 2017
► pp. 151–190

Chapter 5
The “theory of the two extremes”

A rhetorical topography for self- and other-identification across the Greek political spectrum

This chapter reports on a large-scale quantitative and qualitative investigation of the use of the notion of “extremism” in the public discourse of significant political actors during the Greek crisis. It focuses on its employment as a rhetorical tool for the stigmatization of political opponents, specifically for the delegitimation, by the government representatives at the time (New Democracy and PASOK), of potentially threatening political/electoral rivals (principally SYRIZA and the Left, and secondarily Golden Dawn). We also examine the reaction of the stigmatized, by analysing the discourse of the parliamentary opposition, extra-parliamentary web fora and social-revolutionary terrorists, where several strategies of response are identified. We observe that respondents universally prefer lower-key rhetorical techniques, probably in an effort to disconfirm the politically costly extremism reproach.
Keywords: extremism, lexicophraseology, organizational identity, political identity, political polarization, recontextualization, social actors
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework and methodology
    • 2.1The notion of extreme/extremism as a political stigma
    • 2.2Collective political identity as organizational identity
  • 3.The data
  • 4.Publicly debating the notion of extremism: A critical discourse analysis
    • 4.1Initial observations
    • 4.2The stigmatizers
      • 4.2.1New Democracy as a militant force of prudence against the extremist agents of instability and social upheaval
      • 4.2.2PASOK as anti-violence agent and critic of reluctant denouncers of violence
    • 4.3The stigmatized
      • 4.3.1Six strategies of response to the stigma of extremism
      • 4.3.2SYRIZA as agent of democracy and critic of calumniating and extreme Right-leaning rulers
      • 4.3.3The Communist Party (KKE) as anti-fascist vanguard and critic of the systemically-driven “left-right extremism” equation
      • 4.3.4The Athens Indymedia collectivity as people’s advocate and as justified “extreme” in opposition to the genuinely extremist establishment
      • 4.3.5Golden Dawn as virtuous, non-partisan nationalist opposite the anti-Greek rulers and leftist para-states
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 26 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.70.05our
References (29)
References
Ahlheim, Klaus. 2011. Sarrazin und der Extremismus der Mitte: Empirische Analysen und Pädagogische Reflexionen. Hannover: Offizin.Google Scholar
Albert, Stuart, and David A. Whetten. 2004 [1985]. “Organizational Identity.” In Organizational Identity: A Reader, ed. by Mary Jo Hatch, and Majken Schultz, 89–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Backes, Uwe. 2012. Political Extremes: A Conceptual History from Antiquity to the Present. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Böttlicher, Astrid, and Miroslav Mareš. 2012. Extremismus: Theorien – Konzepte – Formen. München: Oldenbourg Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boukala, Salomi. 2014. “Waiting for Democracy: Political Crisis and the Discursive (Re)invention of the ‘National Enemy’ in Times of ‘Grecovery’”. Discourse and Society 25 (4): 483–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni. 2013. “Militant Democracy: The Institutional Bases of Democratic Self-Preservation.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9: 207–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falter, Jürgen W., and Siegfried Schumann. 1988. “Affinity towards Right-Wing Extremism in Western Europe.” Western European Politics 4 (2): 96–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Mary. 2012. Literacy and the Politics of Representation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Imbusch, Peter. 2002. “Der Gewaltbegriff.” In Internationales Handbuch der Gewaltforschung, ed. by Wilhelm Heitmeyer, and John Hagan, 26–57. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaschke, Hans-Gerd. 2001. Rechtsextremismus und Fremdenfeindlichkeit: Begriffe, Positionen, Praxisfelder (2. Auflg). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Politischer Extremismus. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kirshner, Alexander S. 2014. A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combating Political Extremism. New Haven & London: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitis, Dimitris E. 2013. “The 2008 urban riots in Greece: Differential Representations of a Police Shooting Incident.” In Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives, ed. by Antoon De Rycker, and Zuraidah Mohd Don, 323–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, Bert, and Nonna Mayers. 2006. “Right-wing Extremism as a Social Movement.” In Extreme Right Activists in Europe: Through the Magnifying Glass, ed. by Bert Klandermans, and Nonna Mayers, 3–15. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Future’s Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kraushaar, Wolfgang. 1995. “Extremismus der Mitte: Zur Geschichte einer Soziologischen und Sozialhistorischen Interpretationsfigur.” In Extremismus der Mitte: Vom Rechten Verständnis Deutscher Nation, ed. by Hans-Martin Lohman, 51–69. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. New York: Doubleday and Co.Google Scholar
1967. “Der ‘Faschismus’, die Linke, die Rechte und die Mitte”. In Theorien über den Faschismus, ed. by Ernst Nolte, 449–491. Köln: Kiepenheuer und Witsch.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, Karl. 1937a. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I.” The American Political Science Review 31 (3): 417–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1937b. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights II.” The American Political Science Review 31 (4): 638–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1962. Werke – Band 23: Das Kapital – Kritik des politischen Ökonomie I. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
Sandaran, Shanti C., and Antoon De Rycker. 2013. “The Political Use of a National Crisis: Bush’s Legitimation of the USA Freedom Corps in the Wake of September 11.” In Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives, ed. by Antoon De Rycker, and Zuraidah Mohd Don, 187–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soenen, Guillaume, and Bertrand Moingeon. 2002. “The Five Facets of Collective Identities: Integrating Corporate and Organizational identity.” In Corporate and Organizational Identities, ed. by Bertrand Moingeon, and Guillaume Soenen, 97–113. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Southcombe, George, Almut Suerbaum, and Benjamin Thompson. 2015. “Introduction.” In Polemic: Language as Violence in Medieval and Early Modern Discourse, ed. by Almut Suerbaum, George Southcombe, and Benjamin Thompson, 1–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. “Opinions and Ideologies in the Press.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, ed. by Allan Bell, and Peter Garrett, 21–63. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “The Language of Corporate Annual Reports: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Routledge Companion to Accounting Communication, ed. by Lisa Jack, Jane Davidson and Russel Craig. 45–57. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhardt. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity, Second Edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Georgalidou, Marianthi
2023. Greek Political Discourse, 2019–2022: Instrumentalizing Impoliteness and Aggression. In Political Debasement, ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Georgalidou, Marianthi, Katerina T. Frantzi & Giorgos Giakoumakis
2020. Aggression in media-sharing websites in the context of Greek political/parliamentary discourse in the years of the economic crisis. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Hatzidaki, Ourania & Ioannis E. Saridakis
2020. Discourses of aggression in Greek digitally-mediated communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Kitis, E. Dimitris & Dimitris Serafis
2020. Legitimizing austerity in crisis-hit Greece. Journal of Language and Politics 19:4 ► pp. 691 ff. DOI logo
Saridakis, Ioannis E. & Effie Mouka
2020. A corpus study of outgrouping in Greek radical right computer-mediated discourses. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo
Vasilaki, Maria
2020. Dear friends, traitors and filthy dogs. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 288 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.