Chapter published in:
Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist perspectivesEdited by Esperanza Morales-López and Alan Floyd
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 71] 2017
► pp. 133–158
Chapter 7Rhetorical analysis of health risk discourse
The 2009 influenza pandemic crisis
This paper is part of my research on public health crisis communication. I have studied the discursive strategies at play in the case of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic within the framework of rhetoric and argumentation theory. Here, I analyse two opposing speeches given at the turning point of the 2009 pandemic crisis: the hearing in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the management of the pandemic by WHO (World Health Organization).The aim of my study is to highlight the rhetorical nature of public trust as the central attribute of public health institutions’ professional identity. In other words, how these factors – trust and identity – are constructed using arguments, such as the argument from authority or the precautionary principle, and the narratives that give meaning to these arguments.
Keywords: health risk communication, trust, professional identity, rhetorical analysis, argument from authority, precautionary principle, framing, discourse analysis, discourse of pandemic crisis, 2009 influenza pandemic crisis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The social study of risk within a constructivist frame
- 3.Current rhetorical theory as a toolkit for the social study of health risk
- 4.The European Council hearing on June 26 2006: Analysis of the speeches of Wolfgang Wodarg and Keiji Fukuda
- 4.1The speech by Wolfgang Wodarg
- 4.2Construction of the international health authority and community in the narrative of Wodarg’s discourse
- 4.3Construction of the political authorities and other national social institutions in the narrative of Wodarg’s discourse
- 4.4The speech by Keiji Fukuda
- 4.5Construction of the international health authorities and the scientific community in the narrative of Fukuda’s discourse
- 4.6Construction of the political authorities and other social institutions in Fukuda’s discourse
- 5.Final conclusions and interpretations
-
Notes -
References
Published online: 26 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.71.07gar
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.71.07gar
References
Abeysinghe, Sudeepa
Bacon, Dawn and Borthwick, Alan M.
Black, Steven and Rappuoli, Rino
Castel, Robert
Chiang, Wen-Yu, and Duann, Ren-Feng
Cohen, Deborah, and Carter, Philip
Cummings, Louise
Douglas, Mary and Wildavsky, Aaron
Ericson, Richard V. and Haggerty, Kevin D.
Fish, Stanley
Flynn, Paul
2010 The Handling of the H1N1 Pandemic: More Transparency Needed. http://assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2010/20100604_H1n1pandemic_E.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2016.
Foertsch, Jacqueline
Gilles, Ingrid, Bangerter, Adrian, Clémence, Alain, Green, Eva G. T., Krings, Franciska, Staerklé, Christian, and Wagner-Egger, Pascal
Katz, James E., Rice, Ronald E., and Acord, Sophia K.
Kroll-Smith, Steve
Lakoff, George
Lash, Scott
Lausberg, Heinrich
Lupton, Deborah, McCarthy, Sophie, and Chapman, Simon
Mackey, Eva
Majone, Giandomenico
Nerlich, Brigitte
Nerlich, Brigitte, Hamilton, Craig, and Rowe, Victoria
Nespereira García, Javier
Ostherr, Kirsten
Perelman, Chaïm, and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie
Plett, Heinrich F.
Radley, Alan
Radley, Alan, and Billig, Michael
Renn, Ortwin
Scott, Robert L.
Semir, Vladimir de. and Revuelta, Gema
Sullivan, William M.
Tomes, Nancy
van Loon, Joost
Wagner-Egger, Pascal, Bangerter, Adrian, Gilles, Ingrid, Green, Eva, Rigaud, David, Krings, Franciska, Staerklé, Christian, and Clémence, Alain
Wallis, Patrick, and Nerlich, Brigitte
Walton, Douglas
WHO
2009 Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response: A WHO Guidance Document. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44123/1/9789241547680_eng.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2016.