Cover not available
Part of
Representing the Other in European Media Discourses
Edited by Jan Chovanec and Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 74] 2017
► pp. 81–102

Chapter 3
The European “stranger” in Le Monde’s headline discourse

Using systemic functional grammar, a qualitative/quantitative, top-down/bottom-up, three-pronged approach of Le Monde’s print and online headline discourse on “Europe” during 2014 revealed the existence of three groups of “Other Europeans”: non-EU member states, “visible” because of their political, economic or strategic weight, “quasi-invisible” States who joined the EU in 2004 or later, and non-EU members, invisible for their lack of political, economic or strategic weight. These various degrees of visibility, combined with the foregrounding of the European Union, point to the construction of “strangers within”, whose quasi-invisibility and quality of “neither foe nor friend” may result in them being perceived as potentially “dangerous”.

Keywords: Europe, the “Other”, the “stranger”, invisibility, Le Monde , headlines, qualitative/quantitative, top-down/bottom-up, systemic functional grammar
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Polysemy of “Europe / European” in official designations
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Corpus
    • 3.2A three-pronged approach
    • 3.3Systemic functional grammar
  • 4.First step: Polysemic use of “Europe” / “Européens” in Le Monde ’s headlines
    • 4.1Functions of “Europe”
      • 4.1.1 “Europe” as part of a designation (in LM: 1.99%; in LM.fr: 3.67%)
      • 4.1.2 “Europe” as an entity (in LM: 31.07%; in LM.fr: 27.75%)
      • 4.1.3“Europe” as a participant
        • 4.1.3.1 “Europe” as an agent (in LM: 22.8%; in LM.fr: 18.29%)
        • 4.1.3.2 “Europe” as a patient (in LM: 15.13%; in LM.fr: 14.28%)
        • 4.1.3.3 “Europe” as a beneficiary (in LM: 3.98%; in LM.fr: 4.89%)
      • 4.1.4 “Europe” as a circumstantial other than place (in LM: 3.98%; in LM.fr: 4.89%)
      • 4.1.5 “Europe” as a place circumstantial (in LM: 21.11%; in LM.fr: 26.12%)
    • 4.2“Europeans”: Inhabitants of which Europe?
  • 5.Second step: Foregrounding of the European Union
  • 6.Third step: Various degrees of visibility of individual States
  • 7.Discussion: Three categories of “Other Europeans”
  • 8.Conclusion: The quasi-invisibility of the “stranger within”
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.74.04le
References
Andrew, Blake C.
(2007) Media-generated shortcuts: Do newspaper headlines present another roadblock for low-information rationality? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12 (2), 24–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt
(1991) Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan
(1997) Style as audience design. In: Coupland, Nikolas and Adam Jaworski (Eds.) Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook. London: Macmillan, pp. 240–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann
(1966) The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Caffarel, Alice
(2006) A Systemic Functional Grammar of French. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dor, Daniel
(2003) On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (5), 675–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falkum, Ingrid Lossius
(2015) The how and why of polysemy: A pragmatic account. Lingua 157, 83–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed., London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Christian Matthiessen
(2014) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed., New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
(2014) Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Holsanova, Jana, Kenneth Holmqvist and Henrik Rahm
(2006) Entry points and reading paths on newspaper spreads: comparing a semiotic analysis with eye-tracking measurements. Visual Communication 5 (1), 65–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le, Elisabeth
(2010) Editorials and the Power of Media. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. and David Rose
(2003) Working with Discourse. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin-Lagardette, Jean-Luc
(2009) Le guide de l’écriture journalistique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna
(2013) Towards a pragma-linguistic framework for the study of sensationalism in news headlines. Discourse and Communication 7 (2), 173–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center
(June 2015) Faith in European Project Reviving. Retrieved on 29 June 2015 from [URL]
(May 2014) The EU Elections on Twitter: Mixed Views about the EU and Little Passion for the Candidates. Retrieved on 29 June 2015 from [URL]
(2010) Nielsen Analysis. Retrieved on 4 October 2012 from The State of the News Media: [URL]
Potter, Jonathan
(1996) Representing Reality. Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravin, Yael and Claudia Leacock
(2000) Polysemy: An overview. In: Ravin, Yael and Claudia Leacock (Eds.) Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
SEPM, M&P
(2012) Print + Digital 2012. Retrieved on 10 July 2015 from [URL]
Shoemaker, Pamela J. and Akiba A. Cohen
(Eds.) (2006) News around the World. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Mark
(1 June 2015) Time spent reading newspapers fell more than 25% in four years. The Guardian. Retrieved on 29 June 2015 from [URL]
Tajfel, Henri and John C. Turner
(1986) The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In: Worchel, Stephen and William G. Austin (Eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, pp.7–24.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R.
(2003) Polysemy’s paradoxes. Language Sciences 25 (6), 637–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TNS, opinion & social
(2013) Les habitudes médiatiques dans l’Union européenne. Eurobaromètre Standard 80 – Automne 2013. Étude coordonnée par la Commission européenne, Direction générale Communication. Retrieved on 10 July 2015 from [URL]
Wu, H. Denis
(2004) The world’s window to the world: An overview of 44 nations’ international news coverage. In: Paterson, Chris and Annabelle Sreberny (Eds.) International News in the Twenty-First Century. Hants (UK): John Libey, pp. 95–108.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.