Cover not available
Part of
The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal - group - collective
Edited by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin and Nuria Hernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 78] 2018
► pp. 57–80

Constructing personal identities online

Self-disclosure in popular blogs

| University of Helsinki, Finland
The current study aims to discern how identities are built within a sample of ten popular personal blogs and to depict the varieties of identities that emerge. The focus is placed on the diversity of topics disclosed by the bloggers (the breadth of self-disclosure) and the context-bound personal identities that are constructed through this process. The material employs Gee’s (2011) classification of I-statements and Bucholtz and Hall’s (2005, 2008) theorization of interaction and identity. The analysis shows that the topics disclosed in the blogs elucidate facets of online identity supported and created by interaction with the audience, and that a close examination of self-disclosure provides a fruitful approach to studying online identity construction.
Keywords: digital discourse, identity, self-disclosure, I-statements
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background and research aims
  • 3.Material
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Breadth of disclosure
    • 4.2Constructing specific identities through self-disclosure
      • 4.2.1Average Girl and a blogger identity
      • 4.2.2Bitchy Waiter and situational identities
      • 4.2.3Pole to Sole and a survivor identity
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 23 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78.03sal
References (50)
References
Primary sources
A Southerner in San Francisco. Retrieved from [URL]
Average Girl. Retrieved from [URL]
Bitchy Waiter. Retrieved from [URL]
Divine Secrets of Domestic Diva. Retrieved from [URL]
Djenne Djenno. Retrieved from [URL]
Menopausal Man. Retrieved from [URL]
My Husband is Annoying. Retrieved from: [URL]
Pole to Sole. Retrieved from [URL]
The Everywhereist. Retrieved from [URL]
Woogsworld. Retrieved from [URL]
Secondary sources
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2): 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blogger. (2014). Blogs of Note. Retrieved from [URL]
Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A. (2014). Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues. Discourse, Context and Media, 3: 14–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bronstein, J. (2013). Personal blogs as online presences on the Internet: Exploring self-presentation and self-disclosure in blogging. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 65(2): 161–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Finding identity: Theory and data. Multilingua, 27(1–2): 151–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. M. (2012). Why do women write personal blogs? Satisfying needs for self-disclosure and affiliation tell part of the story. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28(1): 171–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, S. H. (2007). Effects of motivations and gender on adolescents’ self-disclosure in online chatting. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 10(3): 339–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y. K., Yoon, S., & Lacey, H. P. (2013). Online game characters’ influence on brand trust: Self-disclosure, group membership, and product type. Journal of Business Research, 66(8): 996–1003. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. (2009). Language and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ess, C., & the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Retrieved from [URL]
Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on Internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323: 1103–1105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2011). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (3rd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti, & D. Perlman (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 409–427). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behaviour. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.). Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, S., Kouper, I., Paolillo, J., Scheidt, L., Tyworth, M., Wright, E., & Yu, N. (2005). Conversations in the blogsphere: An analysis ‘from the bottom up’. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, IEEE Press. Retrieved from [URL]
Holtgraves, T. (1990). The language of self-disclosure. In H. Giles, & P. W. Robinson (Eds.). Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp. 191–207). New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Jang, C. Y., & Stefanone, M. A. (2011). Non-directed self-disclosure in the blogosphere. Information, Communication and Society, 14(7): 1039–1059. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaszczcolt, K. M. (2013). First-person reference in discourse: Aims and strategies. Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1): 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, S. R., & Gaudy, J. C. (1980). Self-disclosure and satisfaction in marriage: The relation examined. Family Relations, 29(3): 281–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jourard, S. M. (1971). The Transparent Self. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Yuping, M., & Swafford, B. (2011). Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research, 38(1): 27–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Class and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Markham, A., Buchanan, E., & the AoIR Ethics Committee. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (version 2.0). Retrieved from [URL]
Moore, S. (2004). Personality and intelligence. In G. Davey (Ed.). Complete Psychology (pp. 452–542). London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Myers, G. (2010a). Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2010b). Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4): 263–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nardi, A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12): 41–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2009). Sharing one’s story: On the benefits of writing or talking about emotional experience. In S. J. Lopez, & C. R. Snyde (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 621–632). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, M. (2011). Variation and change in pattern of self-reference in early English correspondence. In J. Culpeper (Ed.). Historical Sociopragmatics (pp. 83–108). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4): 1428–1451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 13(3): 299–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanone, M., & Jang, C. Y. (2007). Writing for friends and family: The interpersonal nature of blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1): 123–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, J. -H., & Wang, C. -C. (2012). Self-disclosure among bloggers: Re-examination of social penetration theory. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking, 15(5): 245–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. (Eds.). (2011). Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
TIME Magazine. (2014). The 25 Best Bloggers, 2013 Edition. Retrieved from [URL]
Vinson D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Behaviour Research Methods, 40(1): 183–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, C. S., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Mediated disclosure on Twitter: The roles of gender and identity in boundary impermeability, valence, disclosure, and stage. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29(4): 1465–1474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

De Cock, Barbara
2019. To be or not to be … a patient. In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 306], ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.