(eds.)1994Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goffman, Erving
1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Garden City: New York.
Goffman, Erving
1971Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books Inc.
Goffman, Erving
1974Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1994Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hyland, Ken
2005Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
Jucker, Andreas H.
1997 “Persuasion by Inference. Analysis of a Party Political Broadcast.” In Political Linguistics. Special Issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11, ed. by Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcean, 121–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaufman, Sandra, Michael Elliot, and Deborah Shmueli
2013 “Frames, Framing and Reframing.” In Beyond Intractability, ed. by Guy Burgess, and Heidi Burgess, Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado. [URL].
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2001Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2006Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larson, Charles U.
2007Persuasion. Reception and Responsibility, 11th ed. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
Lu, Wei-lun
2018 “A Cognitive Grammar Approach to Leadership Rhetoric: Schemata and Categories in I Have a Dream.” In Analogy, Copy, and Representation. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Christoph Haase and Anne Schröder, 47–55. Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag.
Lunsford, Andrea A., Kirt H. Wilson, and Rosa A. Eberly
2010 “From Mimicry to Mime by Way of Mimesis: Reflections on a General Theory of Iconicity.” Sign System Studies 38 (1/4): 18–66.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2002 “Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 529–545.
Şutiu, Cristina Lucia
2011 “Human Nature: Between Persuasion and Manipulation.” Agathos: An International Review of the Humanities & Social Sciences 5 (2): 99–111.
Swales, John
2004Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, Teun A.
2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society 17 (2): 359–383.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, Francisca A. Snoeck, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans
(eds.)2014Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
van Krieken, Kobie, José Sanders, and Hans Hoeken
2016 “Blended Viewpoints, Mediated Witnesses: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to News Narratives. In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools Across Languages and Modalities, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 145–168. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Verhagen, Arie
2007Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Extended paperback edition)
Walton, Douglas
2007Media Argumentation. Dialectic, Persuasion and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, Ruth
2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Alharbi, Ahlam
2021. Controversy and Discourse: The Arts of Transforming Negativity Through Transitivity. SAGE Open 11:4 ► pp. 215824402110668 ff.
Khafaga, Ayman
2024. Imperatives as persuasion strategies in political discourse. Linguistics Vanguard 9:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
2021. Rule by law versus rule of law: A multimodal analysis of persuasion and legal ideologies in anti-corruption discourse in China. Multimodality & Society 1:4 ► pp. 429 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.