Chapter published in:

Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-Lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 127–148

Chapter 6. Reframing as a persuasive device in public speech

Beyond globalized biodiversity

Anna Franca Plastina

This chapter shows how reframing operates as a persuasive device in public discourse to reorient the audience’s existing beliefs according to the speaker’s viewpoint. The study considers the empirical case of a public speech reframed by a socio-ecological expert to persuade her audience of alternative perspectives on biodiversity. The main aim is to analyze the different types of frame changes intentionally used by the speaker for effective persuasive appeals, and to investigate how these were indexed by linguistic devices and strategies to influence the audience. Qualitative findings reveal a network of linguistic elements at play in evoking frame changes combined with linguistic markers of emotional appeals to influence the audience’s preference for the speaker’s viewpoint.

Keywords: frame changes, reframing, persuasion, rhetorical appeals, biodiversity, frame competition, public speech

Published online: 08 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.07pla

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail

1981 “Discourse in the Novel”. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four essays, ed. by Michael Holquist, 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Barnett, Michael N.

1999 “Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo”. European Journal of International Relations 5 (1): 5–36.

Benford, Robert, and David A. Snow

2000 “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.

Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman

2007 “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication 57: 99–118.

Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte

2016 “Discourse Viewpoint as Network”. In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 13–40. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Davis, Barbara and Eric S. Knowles

1999 “A Disrupt-Then-Reframe Technique of Social Influence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (2): 192–199.

Druckman, James N.

2001 “On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?” The Journal of Politics 63: 1041–1066.

Druckman, James N., and Arthur Lupia

2000 “Preference Formation.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 1–24.

Druckman, James N., and Kjersten R. Nelson

2003 “Framing and Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 728–744.

Eder, Klaus

1996 The Social Construction of Nature. London: Sage.

Entman, Robert M.

1993 “Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.

Fillmore, Charles J., and Colin Baker

2010 “A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. by Bernd Heine, and Heiko Narrog, 313–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gamson, William A., and Kathryn Lasch

1983 “The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy.” In Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives, ed. by Spiro E. Shimon, and Ephraim Yuchtman-Yaar, 397–415. New York: Academic Press.

Goffman, Erving

1974 Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Johnston, Hank

1995 “A Methodology for Frame Analysis: From Discourse to Cognitive Schemata.” In Social Movements and Culture, ed. by Hank Johnston, and Bert Klandermans, 217–246. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

2011 States and Social Movements. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kaufman, Sandra, and Janet Smith

1999 “Framing and Reframing in Land Use Change Conflicts.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 16 (2): 164–180.

Kaufman, Sandra, Michael Elliott, and Deborah Shmueli

2013 “Frames, Framing and Reframing.” In Beyond Intractability, ed. by Guy Burgess, and Heidi Burgess, Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/framing

Lakoff, George

2006 Whose Freedom? The Battle Over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farra, Straus & Giroux.

2014 Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Macgilchrist, Felicitas

2007 “Positive Discourse Analysis: Contesting Dominant Discourses by Reframing the Issues.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 1 (1): 74–94.

Maxwell, Richard, and Robert Dickman

2007 The Elements of Persuasion: Use Storytelling to Pitch Better, Sell Faster & Win More Business. New York: Harper Collins.

Menzel, Susanne, and Susanne Bögeholz

2009 “The Loss of Biodiversity as a Challenge for Sustainable Development: How do Pupils in Chile and Germany Perceive Resource Dilemmas?” Research on Science Education 39: 429–447.

Osborn, Michael, and Suzanne Osborn

1997 Public Speaking, 4th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Plastina, Anna Franca

2015 “The Counter-Hegemonic Discourse of Biodiversity: CDA of Vandana Shiva’s Honorary Doctorate Acceptance Speech.” In Languaging Diversity: Identities, Genres, Discourses, ed. by Giuseppe Balirano, and Maria Cristina Nisco, 99–11. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Pleyers, Geoffrey

2010 Alter-Globalization: Becoming Actors in the Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Potter, Jonathan

1996 Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.

Ryan, Charlotte and William Gamson

2006 “The Art of Reframing Political Debates.” Contexts 5 (1): 13–18.

Smith, Stephen M., and Richard E. Petty

1996 “Message Framing and Persuasion: A Message Processing Analysis.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (3): 257–268.

Sniderman, Paul M., and Sean M. Theriault

2004 “The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, ed. by William E. Saris, and Paul M. Sniderman, 133–165, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford

1988 “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1 (1): 197–217.

1992 “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. by Aldon D. Morris, and Carol McClurg Mueller, 133–155, New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

Sutinen, Jon G.

1997 “A Socioeconomic Theory for Controlling Marine Debris: Is Moral Suasion a Reliable Policy Tool?” In Marine Debris. Sources, Impacts, and Solutions, ed. by James M. Coe, and Donald B. Rogers, 161–170, New York: Springer-Verlag.

Tannen, Deborah

1979 “What’s in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations.” In New Directions in Discourse Processing, ed. by Roy Freedle, 137–181. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman

1981 “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–458.

van Dijk, Teun A.

1980 Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Watzlawick, Paul, John H. Weakland, and Richard Fisch

1974 Change: Principles of Problem Formulation and Problem Resolution. New York: Norton.