Chapter published in:
Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 181206

retrieved 18 October 2014)


Aijmer, Karin
1996bConversational Routines in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Benoit, William
1995Accounts, Excuses and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2004Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
1989Cross Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bethan L., Andrew J. Merrison, and Angela Goddard
2007 “Institutional Apologies in UK Higher Education: Getting Back into the Black before Going into the Red.” Journal of Politeness Research 3: 39–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2014 “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 37–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penny
2012 “Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 “On Face-work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” In Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior, by Erving Goffman, 5–45. Chicago: Aldine. Originally published in Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18 (3) (1955): 213–231.Google Scholar
1971Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise
2009Professional Discourse. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 52–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Victor
2017 “Giving Offense and Making Amends: How Hotel Management Attempts to Manage Rapport with Dissatisfied Customers.” Journal of Pragmatics 109: 1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1990 “Apologies in New Zealand English.” Language in Society 9: 155–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopkinson, Christopher
2016 “The Customer Isn’t Always Right … Aggressive and Defensive Responses to Negative Customer Reviews on TripAdvisor.” In Professional Genres from an Interpersonal Perspective, ed. by Renáta Tomášková, Christopher Hopkinson, and Gabriela Zapletalová, 158–197. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z., and Michael Haugh
2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar
2009 “Public (Non-)apologies: The Discourse of Minimizing Responsibility.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2257–2270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.
1997 “Analysing Genre: Functional Parameters.” In Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, ed. by Frances Christie, and James R. Martin, 3–39. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and David Rose
2008Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva
2009On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orthaber, Sara, and Rosina Márquez-Reiter
2011 “ ‘Talk to the Hand.’ Complaints to a Public Transport Company.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3860–3876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth
2014 “Saying ‘Sorry’: Corporate Apologies Posted on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 62: 30–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ronald, and Scollon, Suzanne B. K.
1995Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John, and Daniel Vanderveken
1985Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2000 “Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis.” In Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 11–46. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2002 “Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 529–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 639–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Face, (Im)politeness and Rapport.” In Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 11–47. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vásquez, Camilla
2011 “Complaints Online: The Case of TripAdvisor.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1707–1717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanderbiesen, Jeroen
2016 “Mixed viewpoints and the quotative-reportive cline in German: Reported speech and reportive evidentiality.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 41–91. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2016 “Introduction: On tools for weaving meaning out of viewpoint threads.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 1–10. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hopkinson, Christopher
2021. Realizations of oppositional speech acts in English: a contrastive analysis of discourse in L1 and L2 settings. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Ng, Carl Jon Way
2018.  In Persuasion in Public Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 79],  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.