Chapter 5
Off the record
The transcription of parliamentary debates for political discourse analysis
This chapter examines the benefits and drawbacks of using Official Reports, such as the UK House of Commons “Hansard” for political discourse analysis. Previous studies identifying transformations that occur to the oral version of events in the process of constructing Official Reports (e.g. Slembrouck 1992) show that transcribers and editors make significant changes and omissions, raising questions about their suitability for the analysis of parliamentary discourse. Acknowledging the theoretical, analytical and interpretative elements of all transcriptions, I critically appraise different types of political discourse analysis that use UK Official Report data. I conclude with some suggestions about the categories affected by Official Report transformations, and suggest that using this data for the analysis of parliamentary discourse should always be critical and reflexive.
Article outline
- Introduction
- The Official Report (OR), the Hansard, and the representation of speech in writing
- Transcription as theory and research practice
- The benefits and drawbacks of using or data for the analysis of political discourse
- Does it matter? Can we use the Official Report(s) for analysing political discourse?
-
Notes
-
References
References
Antaki, Charles, and Ivan Leudar
2001 “
Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents’ Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation.”
Text 21 (4): 467–488.
Bates, Stephen R., Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne, and Liam Stanley
2014 “
Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron.”
Parliamentary Affairs 67 (2): 253–280.
Bayley, Paul, Cinzia Bevitori, and Elizabetta Zoni
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas
1995 Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, Mary
2000 “
The Politics of Transcription.”
Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1439–1465.
Bull, Peter, and Pam Wells
2012 “
Adversarial Discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions.”
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31 (1): 30–48.
Cameron, Deborah, and Sylvia Shaw
2016 Gender, Power and Political Speech: Women and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave Pivot UK.
Carbó, Teresa
1992 “
Towards an Interpretation of Interruptions in Mexican Parliamentary Discourse (1920–60).”
Discourse & Society 3 (1): 25–45.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2014 Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, Paul A.
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Cook, Guy
1990 “
Transcribing Infinity: Problems of Context Presentation.”
Journal of Pragmatics 14: 1–24.
Demmen, Jane, Lesley Jeffries, and Brian Walker
2018 “
Charting the semantics of labour relations in House of Commons debates spanning two hundred years: A study of parliamentary language using corpus linguistic methods and automated semantic tagging.” In Doing Politics. Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse, edited by
Michael Kranert and
Geraldine Horan, 81–104.
Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture (DAPSAC) 80. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Duff, Patricia A., and Celia Roberts
1997 “
The Politics of Transcription; Transcribing Talk: Issues of Representation.”
TESOL Quarterly 31 (1): 167–172.
Fairclough, Norman, and Isabela Fairclough
2012 Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
Gee, James Paul
2014 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 4th edn. London; New York: Routledge.
Hamilton, Craig, Laura Hidalgo Downing, Robert Cockcroft, and Susan Cockcroft
2014 Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. 3rd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Harris, Sandra
2001 “
Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.”
Discourse & Society 12 (4): 451–472.
Hughes, Rebecca
1996 English in Speech and Writing: Investigating Language and Literature. London: Routledge.
Ilie, Cornelia
2013 “
Gendering Confrontational Rhetoric: Discursive Disorder in the British and Swedish Parliaments.”
Democratization 20 (3): 501–521.
Kress, Gunther
1986 “
Language in the Media: The Construction of the Domains of Public and Private.”
Media, Culture & Society 8: 395–419.
Langdon, David
1969 Punch Magazine available at:
[URL] (accessed 1 May 2016).
Martin, James
2014 Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
Mollin, Sandra
2007 “
The Hansard Hazard: Gauging the Accuracy of British Parliamentary Transcripts.”
Corpora 2 (2): 187–210.
Nicholas, Sian
2001 “
Churchill’s Radio Imposter?”
History Today 51 (2): 5–6.
Ochs, Elinor
1979 “
Transcription as Theory.” In
Developmental Pragmatics, ed. by
Elinor Ochs, and
Bambi Schiefflen, 43–72. New York: Academic Press.
Ramagobin, Ryan
2015 “
Mhairi Black’s Maiden Speech Hits 10 Million Online Views.”
Independent,
July 20.
[URL].
Reid, Christopher
2014 “
Rhetoric and Parliamentary Leadership – Prime Minister’s Questions.” In
Rhetoric in British Politics and Society, ed. by
Judi Atkins,
Alan Finlayson,
James Martin, and
Nick Turnbull, 45–57. Basingstoke ; New York: Macmillan Palgrave.
Reisigl, Martin
2010 “
Rhetoric of Political Speeches”. In
Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by
Ruth Wodak, and
Veronika Koller, 243–270. Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.”
Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Shaw, Sylvia
forthcoming.
Women, Language and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, Sylvia
2000 “
Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates.”
Discourse & Society 11 (3): 401–418.
Shaw, Sylvia
2006 “
Governed by the Rules? The Female Voice in Parliamentary Debates.” In
Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts, ed. by
Judith Baxter, 81–102. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shenhav, Shaul R.
2008 “
Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin’s Speeches in the Israeli Parliament.”
Discourse & Society 19 (2): 223–255.
Slembrouck, Stef
1992 “
The Parliamentary Hansard “Verbatim” Report: The Written Construction of Spoken Discourse.”
Language and Literature 1 (2): 101–120.
Spary, Carole
2010 “
Disrupting Rituals of Debate in the Indian Parliament.”
The Journal of Legislative Studies 16 (3): 338–351.
Trewin, J. C.
1952 Printers to the House: The Story of ‘Hansard’. London: Methuen.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2000 “
On the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Immigration.” In
The Semiotics of Racism: Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by
Martin Reisigl, and
Ruth Wodak, 85–103. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Vice, John, and Stephen Farrell
2017 The History of Hansard. London. House of Lords Hansard and the House of Lords Library.
Wintour, Patrick
2011 “
Labour Fury as David Cameron Tells Angela Eagle: “Calm Down, Dear”.”
Guardian,
April 27.
[URL].
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Demmen, Jane, Lesley Jeffries & Brian Walker
Jeffries, Lesley, Fransina Stradling, Alex von Lünen & Hugo Sanjurjo-González
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.